• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

股骨粗隆间骨折固定类型对患者生存率的影响。

The impact of fixation type for intertrochanteric femoral fracture on patient survival.

作者信息

Ramsay Niamh, Close Jacqueline C T, Harris Ian A, Harvey Lara A

机构信息

School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2023 Jul-Aug;93(7-8):1917-1923. doi: 10.1111/ans.18562. Epub 2023 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1111/ans.18562
PMID:37317593
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary (IM) nail fixation for intertrochanteric fractures is potentially associated with improved postoperative function but may have an increased mortality risk compared to sliding hip screw (SHS) fixation. This study investigated postoperative mortality risk between surgical fixation type for intertrochanteric fracture in patients aged 50 years and older using linked data from the Australian Hip Fracture Registry and National Death Index.

METHODS

Descriptive analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves performed unadjusted analysis of mortality and fixation type (short IM nail, long IM nail and SHS). Multilevel logistic regression (AMLR) and Cox modelling (CM) performed adjusted analysis of fixation type and mortality following surgery. Instrumental variable analysis (IVA) was conducted to minimize the effect of unknown confounders.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality was 7.1% for short IM, 7.8% for long IM and 7.8% for SHS fixation (P = 0.2). The AMLR demonstrated significant increase in 30-day mortality risk for long IM nail compared to short IM nail (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.0-1.4, P < 0.05) but no significant difference for SHS fixation (OR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.9-1.3, P = 0.5). No significant difference between groups and postoperative mortality was demonstrated by the CM at 30-days nor 1-year nor by the IVA at 30-days.

CONCLUSION

Despite a significant increase in 30-day mortality risk for long IM nail compared to short IM nail fixation in the adjusted analysis, this was not demonstrated in the CM nor IVA indicating the role of confounders influencing the regression findings. There was no significant association in 1-year mortality between long IM nail and SHS compared to short IM nail fixation.

摘要

背景

髓内(IM)钉固定治疗粗隆间骨折可能会改善术后功能,但与滑动髋螺钉(SHS)固定相比,可能会增加死亡风险。本研究利用澳大利亚髋部骨折登记处和国家死亡指数的关联数据,调查了50岁及以上粗隆间骨折患者手术固定类型之间的术后死亡风险。

方法

描述性分析和Kaplan-Meier生存曲线对死亡率和固定类型(短IM钉、长IM钉和SHS)进行了未调整分析。多水平逻辑回归(AMLR)和Cox模型(CM)对固定类型和术后死亡率进行了调整分析。进行了工具变量分析(IVA)以尽量减少未知混杂因素的影响。

结果

短IM钉固定的30天死亡率为7.1%,长IM钉固定为7.8%,SHS固定为7.8%(P = 0.2)。AMLR显示,与短IM钉相比,长IM钉的30天死亡风险显著增加(OR = 1.2,95%CI = 1.0 - 1.4,P < 0.05),但SHS固定无显著差异(OR = 1.1,95%CI = 0.9 - 1.3,P = 0.5)。CM在30天、1年时均未显示出组间和术后死亡率的显著差异,IVA在30天时也未显示出显著差异。

结论

尽管在调整分析中,与短IM钉固定相比,长IM钉固定的30天死亡风险显著增加,但CM和IVA均未显示出这一点,这表明混杂因素对回归结果有影响。与短IM钉固定相比,长IM钉和SHS在1年死亡率方面没有显著关联。

相似文献

1
The impact of fixation type for intertrochanteric femoral fracture on patient survival.股骨粗隆间骨折固定类型对患者生存率的影响。
ANZ J Surg. 2023 Jul-Aug;93(7-8):1917-1923. doi: 10.1111/ans.18562. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
2
Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.用于成人髋关节囊外骨折的伽马钉及其他髁头髓内钉与髓外植入物的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD000093. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000093.pub4.
3
Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.用于成人髋关节囊外骨折的伽马钉及其他髁上髓内钉与髓外植入物的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD000093. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000093.pub3.
4
Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.用于囊外髋部骨折的伽马钉及其他髁上髓内钉与髓外植入物的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(4):CD000093. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000093.
5
Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.用于囊外髋部骨折的伽马钉及其他髁头髓内钉与髓外植入物的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD000093. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000093.pub2.
6
Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.用于囊外髋部骨折的伽马钉及其他髁上髓内钉与髓外植入物的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(1):CD000093. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000093.
7
Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.用于成人髋关节囊外骨折的伽马钉及其他髁上髓内钉与髓外植入物的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 8(9):CD000093. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000093.pub5.
8
Subtrochanteric femoral fractures and intramedullary nailing complications: a comparison of two implants.转子下股骨骨折和髓内钉并发症:两种植入物的比较。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Jun 28;23(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s10195-022-00645-8.
9
Comparison of Cephalomedullary Nails with Sliding Hip Screws in Surgical Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.交锁髓内钉与滑动髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的比较:一项随机对照试验的累积荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Apr;15(2):192-202. doi: 10.4055/cios22103. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
10
Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.用于囊外髋部骨折的伽马钉及其他髁头髓内钉与髓外植入物的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000093. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000093.