Department of Nursing Science, Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Division of Nephrology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hemodial Int. 2023 Oct;27(4):454-464. doi: 10.1111/hdi.13103. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
The surprise question (SQ) "Would I be surprised if this patient died within the next xx months" can be used by different professions to foresee the need of serious illness conversations in patients approaching end of life. However, little is known about the different perspectives of nurses and physicians in responses to the SQ and factors influencing their appraisals. The aim was to explore nurses' and physicians' responses to the SQ regarding patients on hemodialysis, and to investigate how these answers were associated with patient clinical characteristics.
This comparative cross-sectional study included 361 patients for whom 112 nurses and 15 physicians responded to the SQ regarding 6 and 12 months. Patient characteristics, performance status, and comorbidities were obtained. Cohen's kappa was used to analyze the interrater agreement between nurses and physicians in their responses to the SQ and multivariable logistic regression was applied to reveal the independent association to patient clinical characteristics.
Proportions of nurses and physicians responding to the SQ with "no, not surprised" was similar regarding 6 and 12 months. However, there was a substantial difference concerning which specific patient the nurses and physicians responded "no, not surprised", within 6 (κ = 0.366, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.288-0.474) and 12 months (κ = 0.379, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.281-0.477). There were also differences in the patient clinical characteristics associated with nurses' and physicians' responses to the SQ.
Nurses and physicians have different perspectives in their appraisal when responding to the SQ for patients on hemodialysis. This may reinforce the need for communication and discussion between nurses and physicians to identify the need of serious illness conversations in patients approaching the end of life, in order to adapt hemodialysis care to patient preferences and needs.
“如果这个患者在接下来的 xx 个月内去世,我会感到惊讶吗?”这个惊喜问题(SQ)可以被不同的专业人员用来预测接近生命终点的患者是否需要进行严重疾病的对话。然而,对于护士和医生对 SQ 的反应以及影响他们评估的因素,人们知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨护士和医生对接受血液透析的患者的 SQ 的反应,并调查这些答案如何与患者的临床特征相关。
这是一项比较性的横断面研究,纳入了 361 名患者,其中 112 名护士和 15 名医生对 6 个月和 12 个月的 SQ 做出了回答。收集了患者的特征、表现状态和合并症。使用 Cohen's kappa 分析护士和医生对 SQ 的反应之间的评分者间一致性,并应用多变量逻辑回归分析揭示与患者临床特征的独立关联。
护士和医生对 6 个月和 12 个月的 SQ 回答“否,不惊讶”的比例相似。然而,护士和医生对具体哪个患者回答“否,不惊讶”存在实质性差异,在 6 个月(κ=0.366,p<0.001,95%CI=0.288-0.474)和 12 个月(κ=0.379,p<0.001,95%CI=0.281-0.477)时都是如此。与护士和医生对 SQ 的反应相关的患者临床特征也存在差异。
护士和医生在对血液透析患者的 SQ 进行评估时,观点不同。这可能加强了护士和医生之间沟通和讨论的需求,以确定接近生命终点的患者是否需要进行严重疾病的对话,从而根据患者的偏好和需求调整血液透析护理。