Suppr超能文献

急诊医生被问及的“意外问题”可能预测老年急诊科患者的 12 个月死亡率。

The "Surprise Question" Asked of Emergency Physicians May Predict 12-Month Mortality among Older Emergency Department Patients.

机构信息

1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts.

2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;21(2):236-240. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0192. Epub 2017 Aug 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identification of older adults with serious illness (life expectancy less than one year) who may benefit from serious illness conversations or other palliative care interventions in the emergency department (ED) is difficult.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the performance of the "surprise question (SQ)" asked of emergency physicians to predict 12-month mortality.

DESIGN

We asked attending emergency physician "Would you be surprised whether this patient died in the next 12 months?" regarding patients ≥65 years old that they had cared for that shift. We prospectively obtained death records from Massachusetts Department of Health Vital Records.

SETTING

An urban, university-affiliated ED.

MEASUREMENT

Twelve-month mortality.

RESULTS

We approached 38 physicians to answer the SQ, and 86% participated. The mean age of our cohort was 76 years, 51% were male, and 45% had at least one serious illness. Out of 207 patients, the physicians stated that they "would not be surprised" if the patient died in the next 12 months for 102 of the patients (49%); 44 of the 207 patients (21%) died within 12 months. The SQ demonstrated sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 56%, positive predictive value of 32%, and negative predictive value of 90%. When combined with other predictors, the model sorted the patient who lived from the patient who died correctly 72% of the time (c-statistic = 0.72).

CONCLUSION

Use of the SQ by emergency physicians may predict 12-month mortality in older ED patients and may help emergency physicians identify older adults in need of palliative care interventions.

摘要

背景

识别患有严重疾病(预期寿命不到一年)的老年人,他们可能从急诊科(ED)的严重疾病对话或其他姑息治疗干预中受益,这是困难的。

目的

评估向急诊医师提出的“意外问题(SQ)”预测 12 个月死亡率的性能。

设计

我们询问主治急诊医师“您是否会对该患者在未来 12 个月内死亡感到惊讶?”关于他们在该班次照顾的年龄≥65 岁的患者。我们前瞻性地从马萨诸塞州卫生部的《生命记录》中获取死亡记录。

地点

城市,大学附属医院 ED。

测量

12 个月死亡率。

结果

我们联系了 38 位医生来回答 SQ,有 86%的医生参与了调查。我们队列的平均年龄为 76 岁,51%为男性,45%至少有一种严重疾病。在 207 名患者中,医生表示,如果患者在接下来的 12 个月内死亡,他们“不会感到惊讶”,其中 102 名患者(49%);207 名患者中有 44 名(21%)在 12 个月内死亡。SQ 的敏感性为 77%,特异性为 56%,阳性预测值为 32%,阴性预测值为 90%。当与其他预测因素结合使用时,该模型正确地将存活患者与死亡患者区分开的比例为 72%(c 统计量=0.72)。

结论

急诊医师使用 SQ 可能预测老年 ED 患者的 12 个月死亡率,并有助于急诊医师识别需要姑息治疗干预的老年人。

相似文献

1
3
The Surprise Question Can Be Used to Identify Heart Failure Patients in the Emergency Department Who Would Benefit From Palliative Care.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 May;57(5):944-951. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
7
Usability of the surprise question by nurses to identify 12-month mortality in hospitalized older patients: A prospective cohort study.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103609. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103609. Epub 2020 May 29.
10
Derivation and Validation of a Prognostic Model to Predict 6-Month Mortality in an Intensive Care Unit Population.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(10):1556-1561. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201702-159OC.

引用本文的文献

4
Validation of the Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening (P-CaRES) Tool in Germany.
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 23;14(7):2191. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072191.
6
Analysis of the surprise question as a tool for predicting death in neonates.
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Feb 7;184(2):182. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05879-8.
8
The Surprise Question and clinician-predicted prognosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 25;15(1):12-35. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-004879.
9
Emergency Palliative Care: Early Assessment of an Older Adult With a Fall and Hip Fracture.
J Palliat Med. 2024 Mar;27(3):430-433. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0258. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
10
Best Practices in End of Life and Palliative Care in the Emergency Department.
Clin Geriatr Med. 2023 Nov;39(4):575-597. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2023.05.011. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

本文引用的文献

2
Utility of the "Surprise" Question in Predicting Survival among Older Patients with Acute Surgical Conditions.
J Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;20(4):420-423. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0313. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
3
Estimating 1-Year Mortality for High-Risk Primary Care Patients Using the "Surprise" Question.
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 1;176(12):1863-1865. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5928.
4
Emergency Department-Initiated Palliative Care in Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Oncol. 2016 May 1;2(5):591-598. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5252.
6
Advance directives for older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review.
J Palliat Med. 2015 Jun;18(6):500-5. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0368. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
7
Communication about serious illness care goals: a review and synthesis of best practices.
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Dec;174(12):1994-2003. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271.
9
The 'surprise' question in advanced cancer patients: A prospective study among general practitioners.
Palliat Med. 2014 Jul;28(7):959-964. doi: 10.1177/0269216314526273. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
10
Predicting 12-month mortality for peritoneal dialysis patients using the "surprise" question.
Perit Dial Int. 2013 Jan-Feb;33(1):60-6. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00204. Epub 2012 Aug 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验