• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊医生被问及的“意外问题”可能预测老年急诊科患者的 12 个月死亡率。

The "Surprise Question" Asked of Emergency Physicians May Predict 12-Month Mortality among Older Emergency Department Patients.

机构信息

1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts.

2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;21(2):236-240. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0192. Epub 2017 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2017.0192
PMID:28846475
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6909689/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identification of older adults with serious illness (life expectancy less than one year) who may benefit from serious illness conversations or other palliative care interventions in the emergency department (ED) is difficult.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the performance of the "surprise question (SQ)" asked of emergency physicians to predict 12-month mortality.

DESIGN

We asked attending emergency physician "Would you be surprised whether this patient died in the next 12 months?" regarding patients ≥65 years old that they had cared for that shift. We prospectively obtained death records from Massachusetts Department of Health Vital Records.

SETTING

An urban, university-affiliated ED.

MEASUREMENT

Twelve-month mortality.

RESULTS

We approached 38 physicians to answer the SQ, and 86% participated. The mean age of our cohort was 76 years, 51% were male, and 45% had at least one serious illness. Out of 207 patients, the physicians stated that they "would not be surprised" if the patient died in the next 12 months for 102 of the patients (49%); 44 of the 207 patients (21%) died within 12 months. The SQ demonstrated sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 56%, positive predictive value of 32%, and negative predictive value of 90%. When combined with other predictors, the model sorted the patient who lived from the patient who died correctly 72% of the time (c-statistic = 0.72).

CONCLUSION

Use of the SQ by emergency physicians may predict 12-month mortality in older ED patients and may help emergency physicians identify older adults in need of palliative care interventions.

摘要

背景

识别患有严重疾病(预期寿命不到一年)的老年人,他们可能从急诊科(ED)的严重疾病对话或其他姑息治疗干预中受益,这是困难的。

目的

评估向急诊医师提出的“意外问题(SQ)”预测 12 个月死亡率的性能。

设计

我们询问主治急诊医师“您是否会对该患者在未来 12 个月内死亡感到惊讶?”关于他们在该班次照顾的年龄≥65 岁的患者。我们前瞻性地从马萨诸塞州卫生部的《生命记录》中获取死亡记录。

地点

城市,大学附属医院 ED。

测量

12 个月死亡率。

结果

我们联系了 38 位医生来回答 SQ,有 86%的医生参与了调查。我们队列的平均年龄为 76 岁,51%为男性,45%至少有一种严重疾病。在 207 名患者中,医生表示,如果患者在接下来的 12 个月内死亡,他们“不会感到惊讶”,其中 102 名患者(49%);207 名患者中有 44 名(21%)在 12 个月内死亡。SQ 的敏感性为 77%,特异性为 56%,阳性预测值为 32%,阴性预测值为 90%。当与其他预测因素结合使用时,该模型正确地将存活患者与死亡患者区分开的比例为 72%(c 统计量=0.72)。

结论

急诊医师使用 SQ 可能预测老年 ED 患者的 12 个月死亡率,并有助于急诊医师识别需要姑息治疗干预的老年人。

相似文献

1
The "Surprise Question" Asked of Emergency Physicians May Predict 12-Month Mortality among Older Emergency Department Patients.急诊医生被问及的“意外问题”可能预测老年急诊科患者的 12 个月死亡率。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;21(2):236-240. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0192. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
2
Association of Emergency Clinicians' Assessment of Mortality Risk With Actual 1-Month Mortality Among Older Adults Admitted to the Hospital.急诊医生评估死亡率与老年住院患者 1 个月实际死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911139. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11139.
3
The Surprise Question Can Be Used to Identify Heart Failure Patients in the Emergency Department Who Would Benefit From Palliative Care.“惊讶问题”可用于识别急诊科中需要姑息治疗的心力衰竭患者。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 May;57(5):944-951. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
4
Surprise Question and Performance Status Indicate Urgency of Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Advanced Cancer at the Emergency Department: An Observational Cohort Study.在急诊科有晚期癌症的患者中,意外问题和表现状态提示了舒缓治疗需求的紧迫性:一项观察性队列研究。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Jun;23(6):801-808. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0413. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
5
Using the Surprise Question To Identify Those with Unmet Palliative Care Needs in Emergency and Inpatient Settings: What Do Clinicians Think?在急诊和住院环境中使用惊喜问题识别未满足的姑息治疗需求者:临床医生怎么看?
J Palliat Med. 2017 Jul;20(7):729-735. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0403. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
6
Accuracy of the "Surprise Question" in Predicting Long-Term Mortality Among Older Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department: Comparison Between Emergency Physicians and Nurses in a Multicenter Longitudinal Study.“意外问题”对急诊科老年患者长期死亡率预测的准确性:多中心纵向研究中急诊医师与护士的比较
Palliat Med Rep. 2024 Aug 26;5(1):387-395. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2024.0010. eCollection 2024.
7
Usability of the surprise question by nurses to identify 12-month mortality in hospitalized older patients: A prospective cohort study.护士使用惊讶问题识别住院老年患者 12 个月死亡率的可用性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103609. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103609. Epub 2020 May 29.
8
A comparison of palliative care and rapid emergency screening (P-CaRES) tool, broad and narrow criteria, and surprise questions to predict survival of older emergency department patients.姑息治疗与快速紧急筛查(P-CaRES)工具、广泛和狭义标准以及意外问题在预测老年急诊科患者生存方面的比较。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jun 27;22(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01205-5.
9
Observational study of agreement between attending and trainee physicians on the surprise question: "Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?".观察性研究:在“如果这个患者在接下来的 12 个月内去世,你会感到惊讶吗?”这个问题上,主治医生和住院医师之间的一致性。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247571. eCollection 2021.
10
Derivation and Validation of a Prognostic Model to Predict 6-Month Mortality in an Intensive Care Unit Population.一种预测 ICU 人群 6 个月死亡率的预后模型的推导和验证。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(10):1556-1561. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201702-159OC.

引用本文的文献

1
The surprise question: predictive accuracy in an unselected emergency department population - a prospective study in nurses and physicians.突发问题:未选择的急诊科人群中的预测准确性——一项针对护士和医生的前瞻性研究。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2529575. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2529575. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
2
Serious Illness Conversations in the Emergency Department for Older Adults With Advanced Illnesses: A Randomized Clinical Trial.针对患有晚期疾病的老年人在急诊科进行的重病谈话:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2516582. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16582.
3
The 'Surprise' Question in Haemato-Oncology: The Estimating Physician and Time to Death Reduce the Prognostic Uncertainty-An Observational Study.血液肿瘤学中的“意外”问题:评估医生与死亡时间可降低预后不确定性——一项观察性研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 15;17(8):1326. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081326.
4
Validation of the Palliative Care and Rapid Emergency Screening (P-CaRES) Tool in Germany.姑息治疗与快速急诊筛查(P-CaRES)工具在德国的验证。
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 23;14(7):2191. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072191.
5
Clinical Gestalt to Predict Bacterial Infection and Mortality in Emergency Department Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.临床整体判断对急诊科患者细菌感染及死亡率的预测:一项前瞻性观察研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb 26. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09440-7.
6
Analysis of the surprise question as a tool for predicting death in neonates.将突发问题作为预测新生儿死亡工具的分析
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Feb 7;184(2):182. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05879-8.
7
Accuracy of the "Surprise Question" in Predicting Long-Term Mortality Among Older Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department: Comparison Between Emergency Physicians and Nurses in a Multicenter Longitudinal Study.“意外问题”对急诊科老年患者长期死亡率预测的准确性:多中心纵向研究中急诊医师与护士的比较
Palliat Med Rep. 2024 Aug 26;5(1):387-395. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2024.0010. eCollection 2024.
8
The Surprise Question and clinician-predicted prognosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.意外问题与临床医生预测的预后:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 25;15(1):12-35. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-004879.
9
Emergency Palliative Care: Early Assessment of an Older Adult With a Fall and Hip Fracture.紧急姑息治疗:对跌倒致髋部骨折老年患者的早期评估。
J Palliat Med. 2024 Mar;27(3):430-433. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0258. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
10
Best Practices in End of Life and Palliative Care in the Emergency Department.急诊中的临终关怀和姑息治疗最佳实践。
Clin Geriatr Med. 2023 Nov;39(4):575-597. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2023.05.011. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Using the Surprise Question To Identify Those with Unmet Palliative Care Needs in Emergency and Inpatient Settings: What Do Clinicians Think?在急诊和住院环境中使用惊喜问题识别未满足的姑息治疗需求者:临床医生怎么看?
J Palliat Med. 2017 Jul;20(7):729-735. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0403. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
2
Utility of the "Surprise" Question in Predicting Survival among Older Patients with Acute Surgical Conditions.“意外”问题在预测老年急性外科疾病患者生存率中的效用
J Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;20(4):420-423. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0313. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
3
Estimating 1-Year Mortality for High-Risk Primary Care Patients Using the "Surprise" Question.使用“意外”问题评估高危初级保健患者的1年死亡率。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 1;176(12):1863-1865. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5928.
4
Emergency Department-Initiated Palliative Care in Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.急诊科启动的晚期癌症姑息治疗:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2016 May 1;2(5):591-598. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5252.
5
Characteristics of older adults admitted to the emergency department (ED) and their risk factors for ED readmission based on comprehensive geriatric assessment: a prospective cohort study.基于综合老年评估的急诊科老年患者特征及其再入院风险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Apr 26;15:54. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0055-7.
6
Advance directives for older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review.急诊科老年患者的预立医疗指示:一项系统综述
J Palliat Med. 2015 Jun;18(6):500-5. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0368. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
7
Communication about serious illness care goals: a review and synthesis of best practices.关于重病护理目标的沟通:最佳实践的综述和综合。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Dec;174(12):1994-2003. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271.
8
PREDICT: a diagnostic accuracy study of a tool for predicting mortality within one year: who should have an advance healthcare directive?PREDICT:一项预测一年内死亡率工具的诊断准确性研究:谁应该拥有预先医疗指示?
Palliat Med. 2015 Jan;29(1):31-7. doi: 10.1177/0269216314540734. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
9
The 'surprise' question in advanced cancer patients: A prospective study among general practitioners.晚期癌症患者的“意外”问题:全科医生的一项前瞻性研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jul;28(7):959-964. doi: 10.1177/0269216314526273. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
10
Predicting 12-month mortality for peritoneal dialysis patients using the "surprise" question.使用“Surprise”问题预测腹膜透析患者 12 个月的死亡率。
Perit Dial Int. 2013 Jan-Feb;33(1):60-6. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00204. Epub 2012 Aug 1.