Suppr超能文献

简易定向记忆注意力测试中文版在首次脑梗死患者中的翻译及同时效度、敏感性和特异性

Translation and concurrent validity, sensitivity and specificity of Chinese version of Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test in people with a first cerebral infarction.

作者信息

Zhao Jiang-Li, Chen Pei-Ming, Ng Shamay S M, Mao Yu-Rong, Huang Dong-Feng

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Jun 1;17:977078. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.977078. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to translate the English version of the Short Orientation-Memory-Concentration (SOMC) test into a Chinese version, denoted the C-SOMC test, and to investigate the concurrent validity, sensitivity, and specificity of the C-SOMC test against a longer and widely used screening instrument in people with a first cerebral infarction.

METHODS

An expert group translated the SOMC test into Chinese using a forward-backward procedure. Eighty-six participants (67 men and 19 women, mean age = 59.31 ± 11.57 years) with a first cerebral infarction were enrolled in this study. The validity of the C-SOMC test was determined using the Chinese version of Mini Mental State Examination (C-MMSE) as the comparator. Concurrent validity was determined using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. Univariate linear regression was used to analyze items' abilities to predict the total score on the C-SOMC test and the C-MMSE score. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to demonstrate the sensitivity and specificity of the C-SOMC test at various cut-off values distinguishing cognitive impairment from normal cognition.

RESULTS

The total score for the C-SOMC test and the score for item 1 on this test exhibited moderate-to-good correlations with the C-MMSE score, with respective ρ-values of 0.636 and 0.565 ( 0.001). The scores for each of items 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7 yielded fair correlations with C-MMSE score, with ρ-value from 0.272 to 0.495 ( 0.05). The total score on the C-SOMC test and the item score were good predictors (adjusted = 0.049 to 0.615) of the C-MMSE score, and six items were good predictors (adjusted = 0.134 to 0.795) of the total score. The AUC was 0.92 for the C-SOMC test. A cut-off of 17/18 on the C-SOMC test gave optimal performance: correct classification of 75% of participants, with 75% sensitivity and 87.9% specificity.

CONCLUSION

The C-SOMC test demonstrated good concurrent validity, sensitivity and specificity in a sample of people with a first cerebral infarction, demonstrating that it could be used to screen for cognitive impairment in stroke patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在将简易定向记忆注意力测试(SOMC)的英文版翻译成中文版,即C-SOMC测试,并针对一种使用更广泛的较长筛查工具,研究C-SOMC测试在首次发生脑梗死患者中的同时效度、敏感性和特异性。

方法

一个专家小组采用正反翻译程序将SOMC测试翻译成中文。本研究纳入了86例首次发生脑梗死的参与者(67例男性和19例女性,平均年龄=59.31±11.57岁)。以中文版简易精神状态检查表(C-MMSE)作为对照,确定C-SOMC测试的效度。使用Spearman等级相关系数确定同时效度。采用单变量线性回归分析各项目预测C-SOMC测试总分和C-MMSE分数的能力。受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积用于展示C-SOMC测试在区分认知障碍与正常认知的不同临界值时的敏感性和特异性。

结果

C-SOMC测试的总分及该测试第1项的得分与C-MMSE分数呈中度至高度相关,ρ值分别为0.636和0.565(P<0.001)。第2、4、5、6和7项的得分与C-MMSE分数呈中等程度相关,ρ值在0.272至0.495之间(P<0.05)。C-SOMC测试的总分和项目得分是C-MMSE分数的良好预测指标(调整R²=0.049至0.615),6个项目是总分的良好预测指标(调整R²=0.134至0.795)。C-SOMC测试的AUC为0.92。C-SOMC测试的临界值为17/18时表现最佳:正确分类75%的参与者,敏感性为75%,特异性为87.9%。

结论

C-SOMC测试在首次发生脑梗死的患者样本中显示出良好的同时效度、敏感性和特异性,表明它可用于筛查卒中患者的认知障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d016/10268244/b6a93e3d2bfa/fnhum-17-977078-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验