Rizzo A, Mirabella A, Ferrara G, Mangiacavallo A, Bonanno A, Bonsignore G
Eur J Respir Dis. 1986 Apr;68(4):291-7.
We examined two rapid methods of measuring theophylline clearance using pairs of serum concentration measurements, and compared them with the steady-state values in 31 patients with acute asthma. A constant intravenous aminophylline infusion was started at a rate given by current guidelines. Theophylline clearance was estimated from two serum measurements made with an interval of at least 4 h, providing clearance estimates 5 h from commencement. Duplicate estimates were made, using either a 3rd serum measurement at 12 h or a 3rd and 4th at 7 and 14 h. A steady-state estimate was finally made after 48 h constant infusion. The two rapid estimates agreed well both between themselves and with the steady-state determination despite wide variations in the clinical status of the patients. These methods provide a rapid means of monitoring dosage in the individual patient. This is particularly important when the predicted dose is inappropriate.
我们使用成对的血清浓度测量值研究了两种快速测定茶碱清除率的方法,并将其与31例急性哮喘患者的稳态值进行了比较。按照当前指南给出的速率开始持续静脉输注氨茶碱。根据间隔至少4小时进行的两次血清测量来估计茶碱清除率,从开始输注起5小时提供清除率估计值。使用12小时的第三次血清测量值或7小时和14小时的第三次及第四次测量值进行重复估计。在持续输注48小时后最终进行稳态估计。尽管患者的临床状况差异很大,但这两种快速估计值彼此之间以及与稳态测定结果都非常吻合。这些方法为监测个体患者的剂量提供了一种快速手段。当预测剂量不恰当时,这一点尤为重要。