Research Centre in Sports Sciences, Health and Human Development (CIDESD), Department of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, School of Life and Environmental Sciences (ECVA), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Animal and Veterinary Research Centre (CECAV), Department of Veterinary Sciences, School of Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Front Public Health. 2023 May 30;11:1196199. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1196199. eCollection 2023.
The benefits of the human-animal bond on owners' health and quality of life have been the focus of research in recent decades. However, the results are still inconsistent. Thus, this study aims to investigate whether the presence of a pet, compared to a control group, influences daily physical activity levels and mental health using a meta-analytic method.
The PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched for all research articles that included pets as an object of study and related mental health and quality of life variables between pet owners and non-owners until April 2022. The PRISMA 2020 checklist was used, and the Downs and Back checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. Standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the difference between a group of pet owners and non-pet owners.
An initial search located 11,389 studies, but only 49 studies fulfilled all requirements. Our results indicate that pets have a moderately significant positive effect on the physical activity of owners compared to non-pet owners. Among the moderating variables, the frequency of physical activity showed a highly significant effect, indicating that owners had a higher frequency of physical activity than non-owners. Moreover, our results indicate a significant impact but with a low effect size of pets on owners' mental health when compared to non-pet owners.
Pet ownership does not seem to influence owners' mental health, but it does influence their physical activity. Specifically, owners show a higher frequency of physical activity than non-owners.
近几十年来,人类与动物关系对主人健康和生活质量的益处一直是研究的焦点。然而,结果仍然不一致。因此,本研究旨在采用荟萃分析的方法,调查与对照组相比,宠物的存在是否会影响主人的日常身体活动水平和心理健康。
我们在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库中搜索了所有将宠物作为研究对象并包含宠物主人和非宠物主人之间心理健康和生活质量变量的研究文章,检索时间截至 2022 年 4 月。我们使用 PRISMA 2020 清单和 Downs 和 Back 清单来评估研究的方法学质量。使用标准化均数差和 95%置信区间来评估宠物主人组和非宠物主人组之间的差异。
初步搜索共找到了 11389 项研究,但只有 49 项研究符合所有要求。我们的研究结果表明,与非宠物主人相比,宠物对主人的身体活动有适度显著的积极影响。在调节变量中,身体活动的频率具有非常显著的影响,表明与非主人相比,主人的身体活动频率更高。此外,与非宠物主人相比,我们的研究结果表明宠物对主人心理健康的影响具有统计学意义,但效应量较小。
宠物的拥有似乎不会影响主人的心理健康,但会影响他们的身体活动。具体来说,主人的身体活动频率高于非主人。