• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单次干预缓解情绪困扰后的反应预测因素:在危机情境中运用强化心理教育

Predictors of response after single session interventions for emotional distress: using enhanced psychoeducation in crisis situations.

作者信息

Ache Ana Luiza da Silva, Montezano Bruno Braga, Mosqueiro Bruno Paz, Caldieraro Marco Antonio, Spanemberg Lucas, Salum Giovanni, Fleck Marcelo P

机构信息

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psiquiatria e Ciências do Comportamento, Departamento de Psiquiatria, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina e Ciências da Saúde, Escola de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Criminais, Escola de Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Psychiatry. 2024;46:e20243749. doi: 10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3749. Epub 2024 Sep 21.

DOI:10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3749
PMID:39305893
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11773333/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Single-session interventions are an effective strategy for reducing emotional distress. Enhanced psychoeducation, which includes empathic listening, risk stratification, symptom monitoring, and habit modification is particularly suitable for single-session interventions. We investigated predictors of response to an online enhanced psychoeducation intervention among essential service professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil.

METHODS

The TelePSI Project, financed by the Brazilian Ministry of Health, was a nationwide initiative that served more than 3,300 individuals in various psychotherapeutic modalities. Data were collected from April 2020 to December 2021. We included all participants with high levels of emotional distress who received single-session interventions. The final sample included 460 individuals (89.1% women, 81.1% health professionals). After 1 month, 300 participants were reassessed.

RESULTS

Overuse of social media, use of social networks to contact family and friends, playing video games, smoking, drinking alcohol, and spending time with pets were associated with less improvement in symptoms, whereas playing an instrument and previous psychological treatment were associated with greater symptom improvement. This highlights the impact of lifestyle factors on the efficacy of single-session interventions.

CONCLUSION

These results underscore the importance of considering individual lifestyle factors when implementing single-session interventions and contribute to a growing body of evidence that supports tailored application of psychoeducational strategies in mental health interventions, particularly in high-stress environments.

摘要

目的

单次干预是减轻情绪困扰的有效策略。强化心理教育,包括共情倾听、风险分层、症状监测和习惯改变,特别适用于单次干预。我们调查了巴西新冠疫情期间一线服务专业人员对在线强化心理教育干预反应的预测因素。

方法

由巴西卫生部资助的TelePSI项目是一项全国性倡议,为3300多名个体提供了各种心理治疗方式。数据收集于2020年4月至2021年12月。我们纳入了所有接受单次干预且情绪困扰程度较高的参与者。最终样本包括460名个体(89.1%为女性,81.1%为卫生专业人员)。1个月后,对300名参与者进行了重新评估。

结果

过度使用社交媒体、通过社交网络联系家人和朋友、玩电子游戏、吸烟、饮酒以及与宠物相处时间与症状改善较少相关,而演奏乐器和先前接受过心理治疗与症状改善较大相关。这突出了生活方式因素对单次干预效果的影响。

结论

这些结果强调了在实施单次干预时考虑个体生活方式因素的重要性,并为越来越多的证据做出了贡献,这些证据支持在心理健康干预中,特别是在高压力环境下,量身定制心理教育策略的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/002a/11773333/2af308168989/bjp-46-e20243749-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/002a/11773333/2af308168989/bjp-46-e20243749-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/002a/11773333/2af308168989/bjp-46-e20243749-gf01.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictors of response after single session interventions for emotional distress: using enhanced psychoeducation in crisis situations.单次干预缓解情绪困扰后的反应预测因素:在危机情境中运用强化心理教育
Braz J Psychiatry. 2024;46:e20243749. doi: 10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3749. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
2
Single-session intervention with and without video support to prevent the worsening of emotional distress among healthcare workers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a randomised clinical trial.在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)大流行期间,有无视频支持的单次干预对预防医护人员情绪困扰恶化的随机临床试验
BMJ Ment Health. 2025 Apr 7;28(1):e301416. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301416.
3
Emotional Distress During COVID-19 by Mental Health Conditions and Economic Vulnerability: Retrospective Analysis of Survey-Linked Twitter Data With a Semisupervised Machine Learning Algorithm.新冠疫情期间心理健康状况和经济脆弱性导致的情绪困扰:使用半监督机器学习算法对调查相关的推特数据进行的回顾性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 16;25:e44965. doi: 10.2196/44965.
4
A web-based, peer-supported self-management intervention to reduce distress in relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: the REACT RCT.一项基于网络的、由同行支持的自我管理干预措施,旨在减轻精神病或双相情感障碍患者亲属的痛苦:REACT RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(32):1-142. doi: 10.3310/hta24320.
5
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.
6
Rates and psychological stress predictors of problematic internet use (PIU) during the COVID-19 pandemic in a racially diverse sample of young adults.在一个种族多样化的年轻成年人样本中,COVID-19 大流行期间出现问题性互联网使用 (PIU) 的比率和心理压力预测因素。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2024 Nov;37(6):775-793. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2024.2383766. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
7
Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated With Self-reported Psychological Distress Among Children and Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China.新冠疫情期间中国儿童和青少年自我报告心理困扰的流行状况及相关风险因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2035487. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35487.
8
Americans' distress early in the COVID-19 pandemic: Protective resources and coping strategies.美国在新冠疫情早期的困境:保护资源与应对策略。
Psychol Trauma. 2021 May;13(4):422-431. doi: 10.1037/tra0000931. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
9
Risk, resilience, psychological distress, and anxiety at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.德国 COVID-19 大流行初期的风险、弹性、心理困扰和焦虑。
Brain Behav. 2020 Sep;10(9):e01745. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1745. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
10
Long-Term Emotional Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Barriers and Facilitators to Digital Mental Health Tools in Long-Term Care Workers: Qualitative Study.长期护理工作者的 COVID-19 大流行的长期情绪影响,以及数字心理健康工具的障碍和促进因素:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 29;26:e47546. doi: 10.2196/47546.

本文引用的文献

1
Music-Making and Depression and Anxiety Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic-Results From the NAKO Cohort Study in Germany.音乐创作与新冠肺炎大流行前后的抑郁和焦虑——来自德国 NAKO 队列研究的结果。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Jun 24;69:1606993. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1606993. eCollection 2024.
2
The effects of musical practice on the well-being, mental health and social support of student, amateur, and professional musicians in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic.COVID-19大流行期间,音乐练习对加拿大学生、业余和专业音乐家的幸福感、心理健康及社会支持的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 7;15:1386229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1386229. eCollection 2024.
3
Effectiveness of single-session therapy for adult common mental disorders: a systematic review.
单次治疗成人常见精神障碍的疗效:系统评价。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Nov 7;11(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01410-0.
4
Pet's influence on humans' daily physical activity and mental health: a meta-analysis.宠物对人类日常身体活动和心理健康的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 30;11:1196199. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1196199. eCollection 2023.
5
Temporal patterns of owner-pet relationship, stress, and loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the effect of pet ownership on mental health: A longitudinal survey.新冠疫情期间主宠关系、压力和孤独的时间模式,以及宠物拥有对心理健康的影响:一项纵向调查。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 26;18(4):e0284101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284101. eCollection 2023.
6
Telemental health for clinical assessment and treatment.用于临床评估和治疗的远程心理健康服务。
BMJ. 2023 Jan 16;380:e072398. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072398.
7
Investigating the relationship of COVID-19 related stress and media consumption with schizotypy, depression, and anxiety in cross-sectional surveys repeated throughout the pandemic in Germany and the UK.调查德国和英国在整个大流行期间通过横断面调查重复进行的 COVID-19 相关压力和媒体消费与精神分裂症倾向、抑郁和焦虑之间的关系。
Elife. 2022 Jul 4;11:e75893. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75893.
8
The Effects of Playing Video Games on Stress, Anxiety, Depression, Loneliness, and Gaming Disorder During the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic: PRISMA Systematic Review.新冠疫情早期玩视频游戏对压力、焦虑、抑郁、孤独和游戏障碍的影响:PRISMA 系统评价。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2022 Jun;25(6):334-354. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2021.0252. Epub 2022 May 27.
9
How arts engagement supported social connectedness during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom: findings from the HEartS Survey.在 COVID-19 大流行的第一年,英国如何通过艺术参与来支持社交联系:来自 HEartS 调查的结果。
Public Health. 2022 Jun;207:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
10
Pet ownership and psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.宠物拥有与新冠疫情期间的心理健康。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 12;12(1):6091. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10019-z.