Ferretti Francesco
Cosmic Lab, Department of Philosophy, Communication and Performing Arts, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2023 May 31;14:1197968. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1197968. eCollection 2023.
This paper focuses on the idea that pantomime is a privileged lens for investigating the origin of language in a naturalistic framework. Two reasons support this claim. The first one concerns the motivated and iconic character of pantomime compared to the arbitrary and abstract features of linguistic signs emphasized by the conventionalist thesis. The second reason is that a pantomimic account of language origin paves the way for a rethinking of the traditional hypothesis on the relationship between thought and language. Specifically, it leads to a revision of the thesis of the unidirectional influence of language on thought in favor of a bidirectional influence. Indeed, looking at the relationship between thought and language in its nascent stage means investigating the role of thought in shaping language rather than the role of language in shaping thought. A bidirectional perspective of this type hinges on the twofold idea that thought has primarily a narrative foundation and that pantomime represents an ideal expressive means for bootstrapping the evolutionary foundations of language origins in a naturalistic framework.
本文聚焦于这样一种观点,即手势语是在自然主义框架下研究语言起源的一个特殊视角。有两个理由支持这一观点。第一个理由涉及手势语的动机性和象似性特征,这与传统主义观点所强调的语言符号的任意性和抽象性特征形成对比。第二个理由是,关于语言起源的手势语解释为重新思考思想与语言之间关系的传统假设铺平了道路。具体而言,它导致了对语言单向影响思想这一观点的修正,转而支持双向影响的观点。事实上,审视思想与语言在其初始阶段的关系意味着探究思想在塑造语言中的作用,而非语言在塑造思想中的作用。这种双向视角基于这样一种双重观点,即思想主要具有叙事基础,且手势语是在自然主义框架下为启动语言起源的进化基础提供理想表达手段。