• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冲突检测与基本比率极值。

Conflict detection and base-rate extremity.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China.

School of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Jul;237:103960. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103960. Epub 2023 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103960
PMID:37327658
Abstract

People tend to ignore the probabilistic rules cued by the base-rate information and rely on the heuristic intuition cued by the descriptive information to make "stereotypical" responses in base-rate problems. Conflict detection studies have shown that reasoners can detect conflicts between heuristic intuition and probabilistic considerations despite ultimately stereotypical responses. However, these studies primarily used extreme base-rate tasks. A critical open question is the extent to which successful conflict detection relies on an extreme base rate. The present study explores this issue by manipulating the base-rate extremity of problems in which the descriptive information and the base-rate information conflict or not. As a result, when reasoners made stereotypical responses in the conflict version of the moderate base-rate task, they took longer to respond, had lower confidence in their responses, and were slower to evaluate their confidence than in the no-conflict version of the task. All three measures indicate that stereotypical reasoners can stably detect conflict in moderate base-rate tasks, which expands the scope of successful conflict detection. Moreover, our response confidence data found a larger detection effect size in the extreme base-rate condition than in the moderate base-rate condition. This suggests that conflict detection is more efficient as the base-rate extremity increases. Implications for the boundary conditions of conflict detection are discussed.

摘要

人们往往会忽略由基本比率信息提示的概率规则,而依赖描述性信息提示的启发式直觉,在基本比率问题中做出“刻板”的反应。冲突检测研究表明,尽管最终会产生刻板反应,但推理者可以检测到启发式直觉和概率考虑之间的冲突。然而,这些研究主要使用了极端的基本比率任务。一个关键的未解决问题是,成功的冲突检测在多大程度上依赖于极端的基本比率。本研究通过操纵问题的基本比率极端性来探讨这个问题,这些问题中的描述性信息和基本比率信息是否存在冲突。结果表明,当推理者在中等基本比率任务的冲突版本中做出刻板反应时,他们的反应速度更慢,对反应的信心更低,并且评估信心的速度也比任务的无冲突版本更慢。这三个指标都表明,刻板的推理者可以在中等基本比率任务中稳定地检测到冲突,从而扩大了成功冲突检测的范围。此外,我们的反应置信度数据在极端基本比率条件下比在中等基本比率条件下发现了更大的检测效果量。这表明,随着基本比率的极端性增加,冲突检测的效率更高。讨论了对冲突检测的边界条件的影响。

相似文献

1
Conflict detection and base-rate extremity.冲突检测与基本比率极值。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Jul;237:103960. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103960. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
2
Conflict Detection in Moderate Base-Rate Tasks: A Multi-Measure Study.中等基础概率任务中的冲突检测:一项多测量研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Apr 7;13(4):319. doi: 10.3390/bs13040319.
3
Second-guess: Testing the specificity of error detection in the bat-and-ball problem.事后猜测:测试击球问题中错误检测的特异性。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Feb;193:214-228. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
4
Individual differences in conflict detection during reasoning.推理过程中冲突检测的个体差异。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 May;71(5):1188-1208. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1313283. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
5
Are we good at detecting conflict during reasoning?我们善于在推理过程中发现矛盾吗?
Cognition. 2012 Jul;124(1):101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 May 8.
6
Biased but in doubt: conflict and decision confidence.有偏见但心存疑虑:冲突与决策信心。
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 25;6(1):e15954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015954.
7
To detect or not to detect: A replication and extension of the three-stage model.检测还是不检测:三阶段模型的复制与扩展
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Jun;187:54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 22.
8
Development of heuristic bias detection in elementary school.启发式偏差检测在小学阶段的发展。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Feb;49(2):258-69. doi: 10.1037/a0028320. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
9
People Like Logical Truth: Testing the Intuitive Detection of Logical Value in Basic Propositions.人们喜欢符合逻辑的真相:检验对基本命题中逻辑值的直观察觉
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 30;11(12):e0169166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169166. eCollection 2016.
10
Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking.思维双加工理论中的冲突监测
Cognition. 2008 Mar;106(3):1248-99. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.002. Epub 2007 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Logical Intuition in Base-Rate Problems Using the Instructional Manipulation Paradigm.使用教学操作范式探索基础概率问题中的逻辑直觉
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 18;15(1):83. doi: 10.3390/bs15010083.