Suppr超能文献

口腔与静脉用抗生素治疗肺炎克雷伯菌肝脓肿的成本-最小化分析。

Cost-minimization analysis of oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment for Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess.

机构信息

Research for Impact, Singapore, Singapore.

Dean's Office, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 16;13(1):9774. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36530-5.

Abstract

A cost-minimization analysis was conducted for Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess (KLA) patients enrolled in a randomized controlled trial which found oral ciprofloxacin to be non-inferior to intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone in terms of clinical outcomes. Healthcare service utilization and cost data were obtained from medical records and estimated from self-reported patient surveys in a non-inferiority trial of oral ciprofloxacin versus IV ceftriaxone administered to 152 hospitalized adults with KLA in Singapore between November 2013 and October 2017. Total costs were evaluated by category and payer, and compared between oral and IV antibiotic groups over the trial period of 12 weeks. Among the subset of 139 patients for whom cost data were collected, average total cost over 12 weeks was $16,378 (95% CI, $14,620-$18,136) for the oral ciprofloxacin group and $20,569 (95% CI, $18,296-$22,842) for the IV ceftriaxone group, largely driven by lower average outpatient costs, as the average number of outpatient visits was halved for the oral ciprofloxacin group. There were no other statistically significant differences, either in inpatient costs or in other informal healthcare costs. Oral ciprofloxacin is less costly than IV ceftriaxone in the treatment of Klebsiella liver abscess, largely driven by reduced outpatient service costs.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01723150 (7/11/2012).

摘要

一项成本最小化分析针对参加一项随机对照试验的肺炎克雷伯菌肝脓肿(KLA)患者进行,该试验发现口服环丙沙星在临床结局方面不劣于静脉注射(IV)头孢曲松。在新加坡,2013 年 11 月至 2017 年 10 月期间,对 152 名住院 KLA 成人进行了口服环丙沙星与 IV 头孢曲松的非劣效性试验,从病历中获取医疗服务利用和成本数据,并从自我报告的患者调查中进行估计。按类别和支付方评估总费用,并在 12 周的试验期间比较口服和 IV 抗生素组之间的费用。在收集了成本数据的 139 名患者亚组中,口服环丙沙星组 12 周的平均总费用为 16378 美元(95%CI,14620-18136),IV 头孢曲松组为 20569 美元(95%CI,18296-22842),主要原因是门诊费用较低,因为口服环丙沙星组的平均门诊就诊次数减少了一半。无论是在住院费用还是在其他非正式医疗保健费用方面,都没有其他具有统计学意义的差异。在治疗肺炎克雷伯菌肝脓肿方面,口服环丙沙星比 IV 头孢曲松的成本更低,这主要是由于减少了门诊服务费用。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符 NCT01723150(2012 年 7 月 11 日)。

相似文献

6
Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess: a case report.肺炎克雷伯菌肝脓肿:一例报告。
J Med Case Rep. 2018 Dec 13;12(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s13256-018-1924-4.

本文引用的文献

3
Partial Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment of Endocarditis.部分口服与静脉抗生素治疗心内膜炎。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 31;380(5):415-424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808312. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
5
Economic evaluation of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a systematic review.门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗的经济学评估:一项系统综述。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Aug;17(4):355-375. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1360767. Epub 2017 Aug 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验