数字健康干预对产后抑郁或焦虑的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
The effect of digital health interventions on postpartum depression or anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
机构信息
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI; Center for Digital Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI.
出版信息
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jan;230(1):12-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.028. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to examine the effect of digital health interventions compared with treatment as usual on preventing and treating postpartum depression and postpartum anxiety.
DATA SOURCES
Searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
The systematic review included full-text randomized controlled trials comparing digital health interventions with treatment as usual for preventing or treating postpartum depression and postpartum anxiety.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
Two authors independently screened all abstracts for eligibility and independently reviewed all potentially eligible full-text articles for inclusion. A third author screened abstracts and full-text articles as needed to determine eligibility in cases of discrepancy. The primary outcome was the score on the first ascertainment of postpartum depression or postpartum anxiety symptoms after the intervention. Secondary outcomes included screening positive for postpartum depression or postpartum anxiety --as defined in the primary study --and loss to follow-up, defined as the proportion of participants who completed the final study assessment compared with the number of initially randomized participants. For continuous outcomes, the Hedges method was used to obtain standardized mean differences when the studies used different psychometric scales, and weighted mean differences were calculated when studies used the same psychometric scales. For categorical outcomes, pooled relative risks were estimated.
RESULTS
Of 921 studies originally identified, 31 randomized controlled trials-corresponding to 5532 participants randomized to digital health intervention and 5492 participants randomized to treatment as usual-were included. Compared with treatment as usual, digital health interventions significantly reduced mean scores ascertaining postpartum depression symptoms (29 studies: standardized mean difference, -0.64 [95% confidence interval, -0.88 to -0.40]; I=94.4%) and postpartum anxiety symptoms (17 studies: standardized mean difference, -0.49 [95% confidence interval, -0.72 to -0.25]; I=84.6%). In the few studies that assessed screen-positive rates for postpartum depression (n=4) or postpartum anxiety (n=1), there were no significant differences between those randomized to digital health intervention and treatment as usual. Overall, those randomized to digital health intervention had 38% increased risk of not completing the final study assessment compared with those randomized to treatment as usual (pooled relative risk, 1.38 [95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.62]), but those randomized to app-based digital health intervention had similar loss-to-follow-up rates as those randomized to treatment as usual (relative risk, 1.04 [95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.19]).
CONCLUSION
Digital health interventions modestly, but significantly, reduced scores assessing postpartum depression and postpartum anxiety symptoms. More research is needed to identify digital health interventions that effectively prevent or treat postpartum depression and postpartum anxiety but encourage ongoing engagement throughout the study period.
目的
本研究旨在探讨数字健康干预措施与常规治疗相比,在预防和治疗产后抑郁和产后焦虑方面的效果。
资料来源
在 Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane 系统评价数据库、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和 ClinicalTrials.gov 进行了检索。
研究入选标准
系统评价纳入了比较数字健康干预措施与常规治疗预防或治疗产后抑郁和产后焦虑的全文随机对照试验。
研究评估和综合方法
两位作者独立筛选所有摘要以确定其入选资格,并独立审查所有潜在合格的全文文章以确定其入选情况。当存在分歧时,第三位作者会筛选摘要和全文文章以确定其入选资格。主要结局是干预后首次确定产后抑郁或产后焦虑症状的评分。次要结局包括筛查出产后抑郁或产后焦虑阳性——按主要研究中的定义——和失访,定义为完成最终研究评估的参与者比例与最初随机分配的参与者数量之比。对于连续结局,当研究使用不同的心理计量量表时,采用 Hedges 法获得标准化均数差;当研究使用相同的心理计量量表时,计算加权均数差。对于分类结局,估计合并的相对风险。
结果
最初确定的 921 项研究中,有 31 项随机对照试验(对应 5532 名随机分配至数字健康干预组和 5492 名随机分配至常规治疗组的参与者)被纳入。与常规治疗相比,数字健康干预显著降低了产后抑郁症状的平均评分(29 项研究:标准化均数差,-0.64[95%置信区间,-0.88 至-0.40];I²=94.4%)和产后焦虑症状的平均评分(17 项研究:标准化均数差,-0.49[95%置信区间,-0.72 至-0.25];I²=84.6%)。在少数评估产后抑郁(n=4)或产后焦虑(n=1)筛检阳性率的研究中,随机分配至数字健康干预组和常规治疗组之间没有显著差异。总体而言,与随机分配至常规治疗组的参与者相比,随机分配至数字健康干预组的参与者完成最终研究评估的风险增加了 38%(合并相对风险,1.38[95%置信区间,1.18-1.62]),但随机分配至基于应用程序的数字健康干预组与随机分配至常规治疗组的失访率相似(相对风险,1.04[95%置信区间,0.91-1.19])。
结论
数字健康干预措施适度但显著降低了产后抑郁和产后焦虑症状的评分。需要进一步研究以确定有效预防或治疗产后抑郁和产后焦虑但能鼓励在整个研究期间持续参与的数字健康干预措施。
相似文献
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-8-15
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-10-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-4-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-8-15
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-7-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-5-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-8-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-11-17
引用本文的文献
J Med Internet Res. 2025-8-14
Front Glob Womens Health. 2025-4-9
本文引用的文献
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2022-3-23
Mindfulness (N Y). 2022
Health Care Women Int. 2022-12