Suppr超能文献

一项多中心门诊妇科护理研究显示,女医生在 Press Ganey 患者满意度评分中较低。

Women physicians receive lower Press Ganey patient satisfaction scores in a multicenter study of outpatient gynecology care.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

Office of Faculty Development and Diversity, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sep;229(3):304.e1-304.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.023. Epub 2023 Jun 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emerging data suggest that patient satisfaction data are subject to inherent biases that negatively affect women physicians.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the association between the Press Ganey patient satisfaction survey and physician gender in a multi-institutional study of outpatient gynecologic care.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a multisite, observational, population-based survey study using the results of Press Ganey patient satisfaction surveys from 5 unrelated community-based and academic medical institutions with outpatient gynecology visits between January 2020 and April 2022. The primary outcome variable was the likelihood to recommend a physician, and individual survey responses served as the unit of analysis. Patient demographic data were collected through the survey, including self-reported age, gender, and race and ethnicity (categorized as White, Asian, or Underrepresented in Medicine, which groups together Black, Hispanic or LatinX, American Indian or Alaskan Native, and Hawaiian or Pacific Islander). Bivariate comparisons between demographics (physician gender, patient and physician age quartile, patient and physician race) and likelihood to recommend were assessed using generalized estimating equation models clustered by physician. Odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and P values for these analyses are reported, and results were considered statistically significant at P<.05. Analysis was performed using SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

RESULTS

Data were obtained from 15,184 surveys for 130 physicians. Most physicians were women (n=95 [73%]) and White (n=98 [75%]), and patients were also predominantly White (n=10,495 [69%]). A little over half of all visits were race-concordant, meaning that both patient and physician reported the same race (57%). Women physicians were less likely to receive a topbox survey score (74% vs 77%) and in the multivariate model had 19% lower odds of receiving a topbox score (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.95). Patient age had a statistically significant relationship with score, with patients aged ≥63 years having >3-fold increase in odds of providing a topbox score (odds ratio, 3.10; 95% confidence interval, 2.12-4.52) compared with the youngest patients. After adjustment, patient and physician race and ethnicity showed similar effects on the odds of a topbox likelihood-to-recommend score, with Asian physicians and Asian patients having lower odds of a topbox likelihood-to-recommend score when compared with White physicians and patients (odds ratio: 0.89 [95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.98] and 0.62 [95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.79], respectively). Underrepresented in medicine physicians and patients showed significantly increased odds of a topbox likelihood-to-recommend score (odds ratio: 1.27 [95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.33] and 1.03 [95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.06], respectively). The physician age quartile was not significantly associated with odds of a topbox likelihood-to-recommend score.

CONCLUSION

Women gynecologists were 18% less likely to receive top patient satisfaction scores compared with men in this multisite, population-based survey study using the results of Press Ganey patient satisfaction surveys. The results of these questionnaires should be adjusted for bias given that they provide data currently being used to understand patient-centered care.

摘要

背景

新出现的数据表明,患者满意度数据存在固有偏见,这些偏见会对女性医生产生负面影响。

目的

本研究旨在描述在一项多机构的门诊妇科护理研究中,使用 Press Ganey 患者满意度调查结果,探讨医生性别与患者满意度之间的关系。

研究设计

这是一项多站点、观察性、基于人群的调查研究,使用了 5 家独立的社区和学术医疗机构在 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 4 月期间进行的门诊妇科就诊的 Press Ganey 患者满意度调查结果。主要结局变量是推荐医生的可能性,个体调查回答作为分析单位。通过调查收集患者的人口统计学数据,包括自我报告的年龄、性别和种族和民族(分为白人、亚洲人或医学代表性不足,将黑种人、西班牙裔或拉丁裔、美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民和夏威夷或太平洋岛民归为一类)。使用广义估计方程模型对医生进行聚类,评估人口统计学数据(医生性别、患者和医生年龄四分位间距、患者和医生种族)与推荐可能性之间的二变量比较。报告了这些分析的优势比、95%置信区间和 P 值,结果在 P<.05 时被认为具有统计学意义。使用 SAS 版本 9.4(SAS Institute Inc., Cary,NC)进行分析。

结果

从 130 名医生的 15184 份调查中获得了数据。大多数医生是女性(n=95[73%])和白人(n=98[75%]),患者也主要是白人(n=10495[69%])。所有就诊中略超过一半是种族一致的,这意味着患者和医生报告的种族相同(57%)。女性医生获得最高分的调查评分的可能性较小(74%比 77%),在多变量模型中,获得最高分的可能性低 19%(95%置信区间,0.69-0.95)。患者年龄与评分有统计学显著关系,年龄≥63 岁的患者提供最高分的可能性增加了 3 倍以上(优势比,3.10;95%置信区间,2.12-4.52),与最年轻的患者相比。调整后,患者和医生的种族和民族对最高分推荐可能性评分的影响相似,与白人医生和患者相比,亚洲医生和亚洲患者获得最高分推荐可能性评分的可能性较低(优势比:0.89[95%置信区间,0.81-0.98]和 0.62[95%置信区间,0.48-0.79])。医学代表性不足的医生和患者获得最高分推荐可能性评分的可能性显著增加(优势比:1.27[95%置信区间,1.21-1.33]和 1.03[95%置信区间,1.01-1.06])。医生年龄四分位间距与最高分推荐可能性评分的优势比无显著相关性。

结论

在这项使用 Press Ganey 患者满意度调查结果的多地点、基于人群的调查研究中,与男性相比,女性妇科医生获得最高分患者满意度评分的可能性低 18%。鉴于这些问卷提供的数据目前正被用于了解以患者为中心的护理,因此应该对这些结果进行调整,以消除偏见。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验