Suppr超能文献

超声和超声弹性成像测量症状性和无症状人群下肢神经的纵向运动和硬度:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Longitudinal Movements and Stiffness of Lower Extremity Nerves Measured by Ultrasonography and Ultrasound Elastography in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Populations: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Department of Neuro-physiotherapy, SIA College of Health Sciences, College of Physiotherapy, Thane, India.

出版信息

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2023 Sep;49(9):1913-1929. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.04.013. Epub 2023 Jun 17.

Abstract

This study was aimed at analyzing the effectiveness of ultrasonography (US) and ultrasound elastography (UE) in evaluating longitudinal sliding and stiffness of nerves. In line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, we analyzed 1112 publications (range: 2010-2021) extracted from MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science focusing on specific outcomes, including shear wave velocity (m/s), shear modulus (kPa), strain ratio (SR) and excursion (mm). Thirty-three papers were included and evaluated for overall quality and risk of bias. From the analysis of data concerning 1435 participants, mean shear wave velocity (SWV) in the sciatic nerve was 6.70 ± 1.26 m/s in controls and 7.51 ± 1.73 m/s in participants presenting with leg pain; in the tibial nerve, mean SWV was 3.83 ± 0.33 m/s in controls and 3.42 ± 3.53 m/s in participants presenting with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). The mean shear modulus (SM) was 20.9 ± 9.33 kPa for sciatic nerve, whereas it was an average of 23.3 ± 7.20 kPa for the tibial nerve. Considering 146 subjects (78 experimental, 68 controls) no significant difference was observed in SWV when comparing participants with DPN with controls (standard mean difference [SMD]: 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54, 1.97), whereas a significant difference was observed in the SM (SMD: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.32, 2.25); furthermore, we found significant differences between left and right extremity nerves (SMD:1.14. 95% CI: 0.45, 1.83) among 458 participants (270 with DPN and 188 controls). No descriptive statistics are available for excursion because of the variability in participants and limb positions, whereas SR is considered only a semiquantitative outcome and therefore not comparable among different studies. Despite the presence of some limitations in study designs and methodological biases, on the basis of our findings, we can conclude that US and UE are effective methods in assessing longitudinal sliding and stiffness of lower extremity nerves in both symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.

摘要

本研究旨在分析超声(US)和超声弹性成像(UE)在评估神经纵向滑动和刚度方面的效果。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明,我们分析了从 MEDLINE、Scopus 和 Web of Science 中提取的 1112 篇出版物(范围:2010-2021 年),这些出版物侧重于特定的结果,包括剪切波速度(m/s)、剪切模量(kPa)、应变比(SR)和位移(mm)。评估了 33 篇论文的总体质量和偏倚风险。从对 1435 名参与者的数据进行分析,对照组坐骨神经的平均剪切波速度(SWV)为 6.70±1.26 m/s,有腿部疼痛症状的参与者的 SWV 为 7.51±1.73 m/s;对照组胫神经的平均 SWV 为 3.83±0.33 m/s,有糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)的参与者的 SWV 为 3.42±3.53 m/s。坐骨神经的平均剪切模量(SM)为 20.9±9.33 kPa,而胫神经的平均 SM 为 23.3±7.20 kPa。在比较 146 名有 DPN 症状的参与者与对照组时,在比较有 DPN 症状的参与者与对照组时,SWV 无显著差异(标准均数差 [SMD]:1.26,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.54,1.97),但 SM 有显著差异(SMD:1.78,95% CI:1.32,2.25);此外,在 458 名参与者(270 名有 DPN,188 名对照组)中,发现左、右肢神经之间存在显著差异(SMD:1.14,95% CI:0.45,1.83)。由于参与者和肢体位置的变异性,位移的描述性统计不可用,而 SR 仅被视为半定量结果,因此在不同研究之间不可比较。尽管在研究设计和方法学偏倚方面存在一些局限性,但根据我们的研究结果,我们可以得出结论,US 和 UE 是评估下肢神经纵向滑动和刚度的有效方法,无论症状是否存在。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验