de Souza Diego Alves Rodrigues, Mathieu Hervé, Deloulme Jean-Christophe, Barbier Emmanuel L
Université Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.
Université Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, US17, CNRS, UAR 3552, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jun 2;17:1172830. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1172830. eCollection 2023.
Compressed sensing (CS) is widely used to accelerate clinical diffusion MRI acquisitions, but it is not widely used in preclinical settings yet. In this study, we optimized and compared several CS reconstruction methods for diffusion imaging. Different undersampling patterns and two reconstruction approaches were evaluated: conventional CS, based on Berkeley Advanced Reconstruction Toolbox (BART-CS) toolbox, and a new kernel low-rank (KLR)-CS, based on kernel principal component analysis and low-resolution-phase (LRP) maps. 3D CS acquisitions were performed at 9.4T using a 4-element cryocoil on mice (wild type and a knockout). Comparison metrics were error and structural similarity index measure (SSIM) on fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD), as well as reconstructions of the anterior commissure and fornix. Acceleration factors (AF) up to 6 were considered. In the case of retrospective undersampling, the proposed KLR-CS outperformed BART-CS up to AF = 6 for FA and MD maps and tractography. For instance, for AF = 4, the maximum errors were, respectively, 8.0% for BART-CS and 4.9% for KLR-CS, considering both FA and MD in the corpus callosum. Regarding undersampled acquisitions, these maximum errors became, respectively, 10.5% for BART-CS and 7.0% for KLR-CS. This difference between simulations and acquisitions arose mainly from repetition noise, but also from differences in resonance frequency drift, signal-to-noise ratio, and in reconstruction noise. Despite this increased error, fully sampled and AF = 2 yielded comparable results for FA, MD and tractography, and AF = 4 showed minor faults. Altogether, KLR-CS based on LRP maps seems a robust approach to accelerate preclinical diffusion MRI and thereby limit the effect of the frequency drift.
压缩感知(CS)被广泛用于加速临床扩散加权磁共振成像(MRI)采集,但在临床前研究中尚未得到广泛应用。在本研究中,我们对几种用于扩散成像的CS重建方法进行了优化和比较。评估了不同的欠采样模式和两种重建方法:基于伯克利高级重建工具箱(BART-CS)工具箱的传统CS,以及基于核主成分分析和低分辨率相位(LRP)图的新的核低秩(KLR)-CS。使用4元素低温线圈在9.4T对小鼠(野生型和基因敲除型)进行了三维CS采集。比较指标包括分数各向异性(FA)和平均扩散率(MD)的误差和结构相似性指数测量(SSIM),以及前连合和穹窿的重建。考虑了高达6的加速因子(AF)。在回顾性欠采样的情况下,对于FA和MD图以及纤维束成像,所提出的KLR-CS在AF = 6时的表现优于BART-CS。例如,对于AF = 4,考虑胼胝体中的FA和MD,BART-CS的最大误差分别为8.0%,KLR-CS为4.9%。对于欠采样采集,BART-CS和KLR-CS的这些最大误差分别变为10.5%和7.0%。模拟和采集之间的这种差异主要源于重复噪声,也源于共振频率漂移、信噪比和重建噪声的差异。尽管误差有所增加,但全采样和AF = 2时,FA、MD和纤维束成像的结果相当,AF = 4时显示出轻微缺陷。总体而言,基于LRP图的KLR-CS似乎是加速临床前扩散MRI并从而限制频率漂移影响的一种稳健方法。