• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简短报告:针对疑似肺癌的多学科初步检查作为通向组织病理学诊断的快速通道干预措施

Brief Report: A Multidisciplinary Initial Workup for Suspected Lung Cancer as Fast-Track Intervention to Histopathologic Diagnosis.

作者信息

Pujol Jean-Louis, Mercier Grégoire, Vasile Maria, Serre Isabelle, Vernhet-Kovacsik Hélène, Bommart Sébastien

机构信息

Thoracic Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Cancerology Resarch Institute of Montpellier (IRCM), National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit-U1194, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

JTO Clin Res Rep. 2023 May 12;4(6):100526. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100526. eCollection 2023 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100526
PMID:37333015
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10275718/
Abstract

Guidelines for optimal timing of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment have been implemented in many countries, but the effect of fast-track interventions on the shortening of time interval is still debatable. In this study, the delay from the first specialist visit to the histopathologic diagnosis was compared between two patient cohorts: before (n = 280) and after (n = 247) implementation of a fast-track multidisciplinary diagnosis program. The cumulative incidence function curves were compared, and hazard ratio was adjusted in the Cox model. The implementation allowed a statistically significant increase in the cumulative incidence of the lung cancer histopathologic diagnosis over time. Adjusted hazard ratio for patients accrued in the post-implementation cohort was 1.22 (1.03-1.45) ( = 0.023), corresponding to a reduction of this waiting period by 18%. In conclusion, a multidisciplinary approach of the diagnostic process implemented at the initial visit allows a significant reduction of the timeline until the histopathologic diagnosis of lung cancer.

摘要

许多国家已实施肺癌诊断和治疗的最佳时机指南,但快速干预措施对缩短时间间隔的效果仍存在争议。在本研究中,比较了两个患者队列从首次专科就诊到组织病理学诊断的延迟时间:实施快速多学科诊断计划之前(n = 280)和之后(n = 247)。比较了累积发病率函数曲线,并在Cox模型中调整了风险比。实施该计划后,随着时间的推移,肺癌组织病理学诊断的累积发病率有统计学意义的增加。实施后队列中患者的调整后风险比为1.22(1.03 - 1.45)(P = 0.023),相当于将等待期缩短了18%。总之,在初次就诊时实施多学科诊断方法可显著缩短直至肺癌组织病理学诊断的时间线。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3829/10275718/d3791ce86708/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3829/10275718/b3afdb805f0e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3829/10275718/d3791ce86708/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3829/10275718/b3afdb805f0e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3829/10275718/d3791ce86708/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Brief Report: A Multidisciplinary Initial Workup for Suspected Lung Cancer as Fast-Track Intervention to Histopathologic Diagnosis.简短报告:针对疑似肺癌的多学科初步检查作为通向组织病理学诊断的快速通道干预措施
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2023 May 12;4(6):100526. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100526. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
The effect of direct referral for fast CT scan in early lung cancer detection in general practice. A clinical, cluster-randomised trial.在全科医疗中,直接转诊进行快速CT扫描对早期肺癌检测的效果。一项临床、整群随机试验。
Dan Med J. 2015 Mar;62(3).
3
Impact of optimizing diagnostic workup and reducing the time to treatment in head and neck cancer.优化头颈部癌症的诊断工作流程和缩短治疗时间的影响。
Cancer. 2020 Sep 1;126(17):3982-3990. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33037. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
4
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on a Cancer Fast-Track Programme.COVID-19 大流行对癌症快速通道计划的影响。
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221131000. doi: 10.1177/10732748221131000.
5
Fast vs. Regular Track for Lung and Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis-Time from Initial Finding to Final Diagnosis and Patient Survival.快速与常规诊断路径对肺癌和胰腺癌的影响:从初始发现到最终诊断和患者生存的时间。
J Med Syst. 2023 Apr 15;47(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01939-y.
6
Ten-year assessment of a cancer fast-track programme to connect primary care with oncology: reducing time from initial symptoms to diagnosis and treatment initiation.十年评估癌症快速通道计划,以连接初级保健与肿瘤学:减少从最初症状到诊断和治疗启动的时间。
ESMO Open. 2021 Jun;6(3):100148. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100148. Epub 2021 May 11.
7
[Fast diagnostic track for suspected lung cancer: A patient centered approach].[疑似肺癌的快速诊断路径:以患者为中心的方法]
Laeknabladid. 2017 Apr;103(4):171-177. doi: 10.17992/lbl.2017.04.130.
8
The role of general practice in routes to diagnosis of lung cancer in Denmark: a population-based study of general practice involvement, diagnostic activity and diagnostic intervals.丹麦全科医疗在肺癌诊断途径中的作用:一项基于人群的全科医疗参与、诊断活动及诊断间隔研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:21. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0656-4.
9
Implementing large scale fast track diagnostics in a comprehensive cancer center, pre- and post-measurement data.在一家综合癌症中心实施大规模快速诊断,测量前后的数据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 7;18(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2868-5.
10
Endovascular stent grafting and open surgical replacement for chronic thoracic aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and prospective cohort study.血管内支架移植物和开放手术治疗慢性胸主动脉瘤:系统评价和前瞻性队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Jan;26(6):1-166. doi: 10.3310/ABUT7744.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Lung Cancer Diagnostics: Insights from a Fast-Track Program in a Complex Healthcare Setting.优化肺癌诊断:复杂医疗环境中快速通道项目的见解。
Life (Basel). 2025 Feb 25;15(3):362. doi: 10.3390/life15030362.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Delays in Lung Cancer Treatment on Survival.肺癌治疗延误对生存的影响。
Chest. 2021 Nov;160(5):1934-1958. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.08.051. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
2
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer deaths due to delays in diagnosis in England, UK: a national, population-based, modelling study.《COVID-19 大流行对英国英格兰因诊断延误导致的癌症死亡人数的影响:一项全国性基于人群的建模研究》。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Aug;21(8):1023-1034. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30388-0. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
3
Improving Timeliness of Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Staging Investigations Through Implementation of Standardized Triage Pathways.
通过实施标准化分诊途径提高肺癌诊断和分期调查的及时性。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Oct;16(10):e1202-e1208. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00807. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
4
How long is too long? A scoping review of health system delays in lung cancer.肺癌诊治延误的时间多长才算长?系统评价健康体系中的延误问题
Eur Respir Rev. 2018 Aug 29;27(149). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0045-2018. Print 2018 Sep 30.
5
Timeliness of access to lung cancer diagnosis and treatment: A scoping literature review.肺癌诊断和治疗的及时性:范围文献综述。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Oct;112:156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.08.011. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
6
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 5.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.非小细胞肺癌临床实践指南(2017 年第 5 版),NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Apr;15(4):504-535. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0050.
7
Health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression in the diagnostic phase of suspected cancer, and the influence of diagnosis.疑似癌症诊断阶段的健康相关生活质量、焦虑和抑郁,以及诊断的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 May 20;14:80. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0484-9.
8
Time to treatment as a quality metric in lung cancer: Staging studies, time to treatment, and patient survival.肺癌治疗及时性作为一项质量指标:分期研究、治疗及时性与患者生存率
Radiother Oncol. 2015 May;115(2):257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 May 23.
9
Before and after study designs.研究前后设计。
BMJ. 2014 Aug 8;349:g5074. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5074.
10
Time to diagnosis of lung cancer: technical and pyschological factors that slow down diagnostic and treatment timelines.肺癌的诊断时间:影响诊断和治疗时间线的技术及心理因素。
J Thorac Oncol. 2009 Oct;4(10):1192-4. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181b88045.