Suppr超能文献

真相项目论文一——受害者和幸存者如何体验参与?解决儿童性虐待领域的认知关系不平等问题。

The truth project paper one-how did victims and survivors experience participation? Addressing epistemic relational inequality in the field of child sexual abuse.

作者信息

Barker Claire, Ford Stephanie, Eglinton Rebekah, Quail Sally, Taggart Daniel

机构信息

IICSA, London, United Kingdom.

School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 2;14:1128451. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1128451. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

The last 30 years has seen an exponential increase in Historical Institutional Abuse Inquiries. One feature of these has been to place adult survivor voices at the center of Inquiry work, meaning that child abuse victims and survivors are engaging with Inquiries, sharing their experiences, with this participation often presented as empowering and healing. This initiative challenges long held beliefs that child sexual abuse survivors are unreliable witnesses, which has led to epistemic injustice and a hermeneutical lacunae in survivor testimony. However to date there has been limited research on what survivors say about their experiences of participation. The Truth Project was one area of work of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse in England and Wales. It invited survivors of Child Sexual Abuse to share their experiences including the impacts of abuse and their recommendations for change. The Truth Project concluded in 2021 and heard from more than 6,000 victims of child sexual abuse. The evaluation of the Trauma Informed Approach designed to support survivors through their engagement with the project was a mixed methods, two phase methodology. A total of 66 survey responses were received. Follow-up interviews were conducted with seven survey respondents. The Trauma Informed Approach was found to be predominantly helpful in attending to victim needs and minimizing harm. However, a small number of participants reported harmful effects post-session. The positive impacts reported about taking part in the Truth Project as a one-off engagement challenges beliefs that survivors of child sexual abuse cannot safely talk about their experiences. It also provides evidence of the central role survivors should have in designing services for trauma victims. This study contributes to the epistemic justice literature which emphasizes the central role of relational ethics in the politics of knowing, and the importance of developing a testimonial sensibility when listening to marginalized groups.

摘要

在过去30年里,历史机构性虐待调查呈指数级增长。这些调查的一个特点是将成年幸存者的声音置于调查工作的中心,这意味着儿童虐待受害者和幸存者正在参与调查,分享他们的经历,这种参与通常被视为具有赋权和治愈作用。这一举措挑战了长期以来认为儿童性虐待幸存者是不可靠证人的观念,而这种观念导致了认知不公以及幸存者证词中的解释学空白。然而,迄今为止,关于幸存者对其参与经历的看法的研究有限。“真相计划”是英格兰和威尔士儿童性虐待独立调查的一个工作领域。它邀请儿童性虐待幸存者分享他们的经历,包括虐待的影响以及他们对变革的建议。“真相计划”于2021年结束,听取了6000多名儿童性虐待受害者的陈述。对旨在通过幸存者参与该项目来支持他们的创伤知情方法的评估采用了混合方法、两阶段方法。共收到66份调查问卷回复。对7名调查受访者进行了后续访谈。结果发现,创伤知情方法在满足受害者需求和尽量减少伤害方面主要是有帮助的。然而,少数参与者报告了会后的有害影响。关于一次性参与“真相计划”所报告的积极影响,挑战了认为儿童性虐待幸存者无法安全谈论其经历的观念。它还提供了证据,证明幸存者在为创伤受害者设计服务方面应发挥的核心作用。这项研究为认知正义文献做出了贡献,该文献强调关系伦理在认知政治中的核心作用,以及在倾听边缘化群体时培养证言敏感性的重要性。

相似文献

3
Victims/Survivors' Perceptions of Helpful Institutional Responses to Incidents of Institutional Child Sexual Abuse.
J Child Sex Abus. 2021 Jan;30(1):56-79. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2020.1801932. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
4
Centring the voices of survivors of child sexual abuse in research: an act of hermeneutic justice.
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 6;14:1178141. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1178141. eCollection 2023.
8
Male Survivors of Institutional Child Sexual Abuse: A Review.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2025 Jan;26(1):183-198. doi: 10.1177/15248380241277272. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
9
The impacts of institutional child sexual abuse: A rapid review of the evidence.
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Dec;74:35-48. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
10
"The Unheard Voices": Lived Experiences of Sexual Abuse in Male Survivors.
Indian J Psychol Med. 2022 Sep;44(5):474-478. doi: 10.1177/0253717620972912. Epub 2020 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The epistemic injustice of borderline personality disorder.
BJPsych Int. 2024 Nov;21(4):78-82. doi: 10.1192/bji.2024.16.
2
Centring the voices of survivors of child sexual abuse in research: an act of hermeneutic justice.
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 6;14:1178141. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1178141. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Staff's experiences of implementing patient-initiated brief admission for adolescents from the perspective of epistemic (in)justice.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 15;13:1054028. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1054028. eCollection 2022.
2
Legitimizing user knowledge in mental health services: Epistemic (in)justice and barriers to knowledge integration.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 25;13:981238. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.981238. eCollection 2022.
3
The Power of False Memory Rhetoric.
J Trauma Dissociation. 2022 Mar-Apr;23(2):148-151. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2022.2028220. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
4
Trauma informed interventions: A systematic review.
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 22;16(6):e0252747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252747. eCollection 2021.
5
Reducing Shame, Promoting Dignity: A Model for the Primary Prevention of Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022 Jul;23(3):906-919. doi: 10.1177/1524838020979667. Epub 2020 Dec 20.
6
Trauma Informed Child Welfare Systems-A Rapid Evidence Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 3;16(13):2365. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132365.
7
Childhood physical abuse and emotional neglect are specifically associated with adult mental disorders.
J Ment Health. 2020 Aug;29(4):376-384. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2018.1521940. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
8
Epistemic struggles: The role of advocacy in promoting epistemic justice and rights in mental health.
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Dec;219:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
9
(Mis)understanding trauma-informed approaches in mental health.
J Ment Health. 2018 Oct;27(5):383-387. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2018.1520973. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
10
Systematic review of organisation-wide, trauma-informed care models in out-of-home care (OoHC) settings.
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 May;27(3):e10-e22. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12621. Epub 2018 Jul 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验