• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于识别轻度钝性头部创伤后有发生具有临床重要性创伤性脑损伤高风险儿童的简化临床预测规则的推导与验证

Derivation and Validation of a Simplified Clinical Prediction Rule for Identifying Children at Increased Risk for Clinically Important Traumatic Brain Injuries Following Minor Blunt Head Trauma.

作者信息

Rowe Callum, Wiesendanger Kathryn, Polet Conner, Kuppermann Nathan, Aronoff Stephen

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA.

Department of Psychiatry, SUNY Downstate, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Pediatr X. 2020 Apr 22;3:100026. doi: 10.1016/j.ympdx.2020.100026. eCollection 2020 Summer.

DOI:10.1016/j.ympdx.2020.100026
PMID:37333944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10236552/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a simplified clinical prediction tool for identifying children with clinically important traumatic brain injuries (ciTBIs) after minor blunt head trauma by applying machine learning to the previously reported Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network dataset.

STUDY DESIGN

The deidentified dataset consisted of 43 399 patients <18 years old who presented with blunt head trauma to 1 of 25 pediatric emergency departments between June 2004 and September 2006. We divided the dataset into derivation (training) and validation (testing) subsets; 4 machine learning algorithms were optimized using the training set. Fitted models used the test set to predict ciTBI and these predictions were compared statistically with the a priori (no information) rate.

RESULTS

None of the 4 machine learning models was superior to the no information rate. Children without clinical evidence of a skull fracture and with Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 15 were at the lowest risk for ciTBIs (0.48%; 95% CI 0.42%-0.55%).

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning algorithms were unable to produce a more accurate prediction tool for ciTBI among children with minor blunt head trauma beyond the absence of clinical evidence of skull fractures and having Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 15.

摘要

目的

通过对先前报道的儿科急诊应用研究网络数据集应用机器学习,开发一种简化的临床预测工具,以识别轻度钝性头部外伤后具有临床重要性的创伤性脑损伤(ciTBI)患儿。

研究设计

去识别化数据集包括2004年6月至2006年9月期间在25个儿科急诊科之一因钝性头部外伤就诊的43399例18岁以下患者。我们将数据集分为推导(训练)和验证(测试)子集;使用训练集对4种机器学习算法进行优化。拟合模型使用测试集预测ciTBI,并将这些预测与先验(无信息)率进行统计学比较。

结果

4种机器学习模型均不优于无信息率。无颅骨骨折临床证据且格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为15分的儿童发生ciTBI的风险最低(0.48%;95%CI 0.42%-0.55%)。

结论

除了没有颅骨骨折的临床证据和格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为15分之外,机器学习算法无法为轻度钝性头部外伤患儿的ciTBI生成更准确的预测工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1c9/10236552/42720b38fef4/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1c9/10236552/a2ca0b376166/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1c9/10236552/42720b38fef4/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1c9/10236552/a2ca0b376166/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1c9/10236552/42720b38fef4/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Derivation and Validation of a Simplified Clinical Prediction Rule for Identifying Children at Increased Risk for Clinically Important Traumatic Brain Injuries Following Minor Blunt Head Trauma.一种用于识别轻度钝性头部创伤后有发生具有临床重要性创伤性脑损伤高风险儿童的简化临床预测规则的推导与验证
J Pediatr X. 2020 Apr 22;3:100026. doi: 10.1016/j.ympdx.2020.100026. eCollection 2020 Summer.
2
Comparison of Prediction Rules and Clinician Suspicion for Identifying Children With Clinically Important Brain Injuries After Blunt Head Trauma.钝性头部创伤后识别具有临床重要性脑损伤儿童的预测规则与临床医生怀疑程度的比较
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 May;23(5):566-75. doi: 10.1111/acem.12923. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
3
Isolated loss of consciousness in children with minor blunt head trauma.儿童轻微钝性头部外伤后孤立性意识丧失。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Sep;168(9):837-43. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.361.
4
The Association of Glasgow Coma Scale Score With Clinically Important Traumatic Brain Injuries in Children.格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分与儿童临床显著颅脑损伤的相关性研究。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 Nov;36(11):e610-e613. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001701.
5
Performance of the Pediatric Glasgow Coma Scale Score in the Evaluation of Children With Blunt Head Trauma.小儿格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分在钝性头部创伤患儿评估中的表现
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;23(8):878-84. doi: 10.1111/acem.13014. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
6
External Validation of the PECARN Head Trauma Prediction Rules in Japan.日本儿科急诊应用研究网络(PECRN)头部创伤预测规则的外部验证
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;24(3):308-314. doi: 10.1111/acem.13129.
7
Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study.头部创伤后临床重要脑损伤极低风险儿童的识别:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet. 2009 Oct 3;374(9696):1160-70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61558-0. Epub 2009 Sep 14.
8
Evaluation of the PECARN rule for traumatic brain injury applied to infants younger than 3 months and creation of a modified, age-specific rule.评估应用于3个月以下婴儿的小儿急诊护理应用研究网络(PE-CARN)创伤性脑损伤规则,并制定一个经过修改的、针对特定年龄的规则。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Jan;182(1):191-200. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04661-y. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
9
Validation of the PECARN clinical decision rule for children with minor head trauma: a French multicenter prospective study.小儿轻度头部创伤的PECARN临床决策规则验证:一项法国多中心前瞻性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Aug 4;24:98. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0287-3.
10
Isolated linear skull fractures in children with blunt head trauma.儿童钝性头部外伤中的孤立线性颅骨骨折。
Pediatrics. 2015 Apr;135(4):e851-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2858. Epub 2015 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Data Augmentation and Machine Learning algorithms for multi-class imbalanced morphometrics data of stingless bees.用于无刺蜂多类不平衡形态测量数据的数据增强和机器学习算法
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 23;11(3):e42214. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42214. eCollection 2025 Feb 15.
2
Leveraging machine learning tools and algorithms for analysis of fruit fly morphometrics.利用机器学习工具和算法分析果蝇形态计量学。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 3;12(1):7208. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11258-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Machine Learning Optimal Classification Trees With the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network Head Trauma Decision Rules.机器学习最优分类树与儿科急诊护理应用研究网络头部创伤决策规则的比较。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Jul 1;173(7):648-656. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1068.
2
A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models.系统评价显示,机器学习在临床预测模型中并未优于逻辑回归。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;110:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
3
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Clinical Outcomes for Children During Emergency Department Triage.
基于机器学习的急诊科分诊中儿童临床结局预测。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e186937. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6937.
4
Risk of Brain Tumor Induction from Pediatric Head CT Procedures: A Systematic Literature Review.儿科头部CT检查引发脑肿瘤的风险:一项系统文献综述
Brain Tumor Res Treat. 2018 Apr;6(1):1-7. doi: 10.14791/btrt.2018.6.e4.
5
Prostate Cancer Probability Prediction By Machine Learning Technique.基于机器学习技术的前列腺癌概率预测
Cancer Invest. 2017 Nov 26;35(10):647-651. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2017.1406496.
6
Statistical-learning strategies generate only modestly performing predictive models for urinary symptoms following external beam radiotherapy of the prostate: A comparison of conventional and machine-learning methods.统计学习策略生成的预测模型在前列腺外照射放疗后对泌尿系统症状的预测表现一般:传统方法与机器学习方法的比较
Med Phys. 2016 May;43(5):2040. doi: 10.1118/1.4944738.
7
Machine Learning and the Profession of Medicine.机器学习与医学职业。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 9;315(6):551-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18421.
8
Use of Clinical Prediction Rules for Guiding Use of Computed Tomography in Adults With Head Trauma.临床预测规则在指导成人头部创伤患者计算机断层扫描应用中的作用
JAMA. 2015;314(24):2629-31. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.17298.
9
Screening for prediabetes using machine learning models.使用机器学习模型筛查糖尿病前期。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2014;2014:618976. doi: 10.1155/2014/618976. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
10
Osteoporosis risk prediction using machine learning and conventional methods.使用机器学习和传统方法进行骨质疏松症风险预测。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:188-91. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6609469.