Suppr超能文献

PI-RADS 3评分:临床显著性前列腺癌检测的回顾性经验

PI-RADS 3 score: A retrospective experience of clinically significant prostate cancer detection.

作者信息

Camacho Andrés, Salah Fatima, Bay Camden P, Waring Jonathan, Umeton Renato, Hirsch Michelle S, Cole Alexander P, Kibel Adam S, Loda Massimo, Tempany Clare M, Fennessy Fiona M

机构信息

Department of Radiology Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.

Department of Informatics and Analytics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.

出版信息

BJUI Compass. 2023 Apr 11;4(4):473-481. doi: 10.1002/bco2.231. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The study aims to propose an optimal workflow in patients with a PI-RADS 3 (PR-3) assessment category (AC) through determining the timing and type of pathology interrogation used for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in these men based upon a 5-year retrospective review in a large academic medical center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This United States Health Insurance Probability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant, institutional review board-approved retrospective study included men without prior csPCa diagnosis who received PR-3 AC on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI). Subsequent incidence and time to csPCa diagnosis and number/type of prostate interventions was recorded. Categorical data were compared using Fisher's exact test and continuous data using ANOVA omnibus -test.

RESULTS

Our cohort of 3238 men identified 332 who received PR-3 as their highest AC on MRI, 240 (72.3%) of whom had pathology follow-up within 5 years. csPCa was detected in 76/240 (32%) and non-csPCa in 109/240 (45%) within 9.0 ± 10.6 months. Using a non-targeted trans-rectal ultrasound biopsy as the initial approach ( = 55), another diagnostic procedure was required to diagnose csPCa in 42/55 (76.4%) of men, compared with 3/21(14.3%) men with an initial MR targeted-biopsy approach ( = 21); ( < 0.0001). Those with csPCa had higher median serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density, and lower median prostate volume ( < 0.003) compared with non-csPCa/no PCa.

CONCLUSION

Most patients with PR-3 AC underwent prostate pathology exams within 5 years, 32% of whom were found to have csPCa within 1 year of MRI, most often with a higher PSA density and a prior non-csPCa diagnosis. Addition of a targeted biopsy approach initially reduced the need for a second biopsy to reach a for csPCa diagnosis. Thus, a combination of systematic and targeted biopsy is advised in men with PR-3 and a co-existing abnormal PSA and PSA density.

摘要

原理与目的

本研究旨在通过对一家大型学术医疗中心5年的回顾性研究,确定用于检测这些男性临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)的病理检查时机和类型,从而为PI-RADS 3(PR-3)评估类别(AC)的患者提出最佳工作流程。

材料与方法

这项符合美国《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)且经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性研究纳入了既往未诊断csPCa且磁共振成像(MRI)检查为PR-3 AC的男性。记录随后的csPCa诊断发生率、时间以及前列腺干预的数量/类型。分类数据采用Fisher精确检验进行比较,连续数据采用方差分析综合检验。

结果

我们的3238名男性队列中,有332人在MRI检查中最高AC为PR-3,其中240人(72.3%)在5年内接受了病理随访。在9.0±10.6个月内,76/240(32%)被检测出患有csPCa,109/240(45%)为非csPCa。以非靶向经直肠超声活检作为初始方法(n = 55)时,42/55(76.4%)的男性需要另一种诊断程序来诊断csPCa,而初始采用MR靶向活检方法的男性中这一比例为3/21(14.3%)(n = 21);(P < 0.0001)。与非csPCa/无PCa患者相比,csPCa患者的血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和PSA密度中位数更高,前列腺体积中位数更低(P < 0.003)。

结论

大多数PR-3 AC患者在5年内接受了前列腺病理检查,其中32%在MRI检查后1年内被发现患有csPCa,多数患者PSA密度较高且既往有非csPCa诊断。最初采用靶向活检方法减少了为诊断csPCa而进行二次活检的需求。因此,对于PR-3且同时存在PSA和PSA密度异常的男性,建议采用系统活检和靶向活检相结合的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1f5/10268585/94193b53aa54/BCO2-4-473-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验