• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

附带损害:新冠疫情对医学研究的影响是否大于其他科学领域?

Collateral damage: has the COVID-19 pandemic more strongly impacted medical research than other scientific areas?

机构信息

CRUB, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Bariloche, Argentina.

CONICET, LIHO, Inibioma, Bariloche, Argentina.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2023 Jun 13;11:e15436. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15436. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.15436
PMID:37334115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10274584/
Abstract

The principle of resource allocation states that diversion of resources to attend a function may compromise others. The COVID-19 pandemic required a rapid response with a justifiable relocation of equipment, funds and human resources. Based on the ecological principle of allocation, we tested whether the relocation of resources to support COVID-19 research was more detrimental to medical research than to research in other scientific areas. We compared the yearly number of published articles from 2015 to 2021 using disease-related keywords and non-medical scientific keywords. Contrary to the expectation, we found an abrupt reduction in the publication rates in all research areas from 2019 to 2020 or 2021, compared to the pre-pandemic period (2015-2019). The allocation effect on medical research may be overshadowed by stronger effects of the pandemic, or it may become evident in the coming years. The drastic reduction in published papers could have negative consequences for scientific advancements, including understanding and curing diseases other than COVID-19 that strongly affect humanity.

摘要

资源配置原则指出,将资源转移到某项功能上可能会影响其他功能。COVID-19 大流行要求快速做出反应,合理调配设备、资金和人力资源。基于分配的生态原则,我们测试了将资源转移以支持 COVID-19 研究是否比支持其他科学领域的研究对医学研究更不利。我们比较了 2015 年至 2021 年使用疾病相关关键字和非医学科学关键字发表的文章数量。出乎意料的是,与大流行前时期(2015-2019 年)相比,我们发现所有研究领域的出版物数量在 2019 年至 2020 年或 2021 年突然减少。对医学研究的分配效应可能被大流行的更强效应所掩盖,也可能在未来几年显现出来。发表的论文数量大幅减少可能会对科学进步产生负面影响,包括对除 COVID-19 以外强烈影响人类的其他疾病的理解和治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fd0/10274584/7581388f6ff7/peerj-11-15436-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fd0/10274584/307a0faf5945/peerj-11-15436-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fd0/10274584/8bc61249f752/peerj-11-15436-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fd0/10274584/7581388f6ff7/peerj-11-15436-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fd0/10274584/307a0faf5945/peerj-11-15436-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fd0/10274584/8bc61249f752/peerj-11-15436-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fd0/10274584/7581388f6ff7/peerj-11-15436-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Collateral damage: has the COVID-19 pandemic more strongly impacted medical research than other scientific areas?附带损害:新冠疫情对医学研究的影响是否大于其他科学领域?
PeerJ. 2023 Jun 13;11:e15436. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15436. eCollection 2023.
2
Allocation of resources for health care in COVID-19 pandemic times: integrative review.2019冠状病毒病大流行时期的医疗保健资源分配:综合综述
Rev Bras Enferm. 2020 Sep 18;73(suppl 2):e20200244. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0244. eCollection 2020.
3
The impact of resource allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac surgical practice and patient outcomes: a systematic review.COVID-19 大流行期间资源配置对心脏外科学术实践和患者结局的影响:系统评价。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Jun 1;63(6). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad230.
4
COVID-19 pandemic as reflected in Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine.在《临床与实验医学进展》中反映的 COVID-19 大流行。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2022 Dec;31(12):1305-1307. doi: 10.17219/acem/157447.
5
Resource allocation in the Covid-19 health crisis: are Covid-19 preventive measures consistent with the Rule of Rescue?新冠疫情健康危机中的资源配置:新冠预防措施是否符合援救规则?
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Dec;24(4):487-492. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10045-0. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
6
An alarming retraction rate for scientific publications on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).关于 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的科学出版物惊人的撤回率。
Account Res. 2021 Jan;28(1):47-53. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1782203. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
7
Impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on scientific research and implications for clinical academic training - A review.冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行对科学研究的影响及其对临床学术培训的影响-综述。
Int J Surg. 2021 Feb;86:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.12.008. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
8
Reserve Systems for Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Path From April 2020 to April 2021.新冠疫情期间稀缺医疗资源分配的储备系统:2020年4月至2021年4月的历程
Chest. 2021 Oct;160(4):1572-1575. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.001.
9
Resource Allocation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Contributions to an Ethical Approach.2019年冠状病毒病疫情期间的资源分配:对一种伦理方法的贡献
Acta Med Port. 2021 Jun 30;34(7-8):558-561. doi: 10.20344/amp.16142. Epub 2021 May 19.
10
[Ethical guides, criteria for admission in intensive care, palliative care. Multi-society recommendations for allocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic].[伦理指南、重症监护与姑息治疗的收治标准。多学会关于新冠疫情期间资源分配的建议]
Medicina (B Aires). 2020;80 Suppl 3:45-64.

本文引用的文献

1
The unintended consequences of the pandemic on non-pandemic research activities.疫情对非疫情研究活动产生的意外后果。
Res Policy. 2022 Jan;51(1):104369. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104369. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
2
Analysis of the impact of the pandemic on surgical residency programs during the first wave in Argentina: A cross - sectional study.阿根廷第一波疫情期间大流行对外科住院医师培训项目的影响分析:一项横断面研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Feb;62:455-459. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.065. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
3
COVID-19 recovery funds dwarf clean energy investment needs.
新冠疫情复苏资金使清洁能源投资需求相形见绌。
Science. 2020 Oct 16;370(6514):298-300. doi: 10.1126/science.abc9697.
4
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Biomedical and Clinical Research.
Matter. 2020 Oct 7;3(4):970-973. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2020.08.026. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
5
Pandemic darkens postdocs' work and career hopes.疫情给博士后的工作和职业希望蒙上阴影。
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7824):309-312. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02548-2.
6
Impact of COVID-19 on early career scientists: an optimistic guide for the future.新冠疫情对早期职业科学家的影响:对未来的乐观指南。
BMC Biol. 2020 Jul 30;18(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-00821-4.
7
Opinion: Here's how we restore productivity and vigor to the biomedical research workforce in the midst of COVID-19.观点:以下是我们在新冠疫情期间恢复生物医学研究人员生产力与活力的方法。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 18;117(33):19612-19614. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2014730117. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
8
Research funding after COVID-19.新冠疫情后的研究资金
Nat Microbiol. 2020 Aug;5(8):986. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0768-z.
9
Safeguarding Non-COVID-19 Research: Looking Up from Ground Zero.保障非 COVID-19 研究:从震中抬头。
Arch Med Res. 2020 Oct;51(7):731-732. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.05.023. Epub 2020 May 30.
10
Junior researchers hit by coronavirus-triggered hiring freezes.初级研究人员受到冠状病毒引发的招聘冻结的冲击。
Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7812):449-450. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01656-3.