• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚全科医生对新的“四合一”预防保健风险评估工具的偏好和观点:LEAD!GP 项目。

Preferences and Perspectives of Australian General Practitioners Towards a New "Four-in-One" Risk Assessment Tool for Preventative Health: The LEAD! GP Project.

机构信息

Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.

St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Kew, Australia.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;94(2):801-814. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230287.

DOI:10.3233/JAD-230287
PMID:37334606
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dementia risk reduction is a public health priority and general practitioners (GPs) play a pivotal role in preventative healthcare. Therefore, risk assessment tools should be designed with GPs' preferences and perspectives in mind.

OBJECTIVE

The LEAD! GP project aimed to investigate Australian GPs' preferences and perspectives relating to design, use and implementation of a new risk assessment tool that simultaneously calculates risk for four outcomes- dementia, diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarct, and stroke.

METHODS

A mixed methods study using semi-structured interviews of a diverse group of 30 Australian GPs was conducted. Interview transcripts were analyzed thematically. Demographics and questions that elicited categorical answers were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

Overall, GPs felt that preventative healthcare was important with some finding it rewarding, and others finding it difficult. GPs currently use many risk assessment tools. GPs' perception of the usefulness and negatives/barriers of tools related to clinical practice applicability, patient engagement, and practical aspects. The largest barrier was lack of time. GPs responded positively to the concept of a four-in-one tool and preferred it to be relatively short, supported by practice nurses and some patient involvement, linked to education resources, available in different formats, and integrated into practice software.

CONCLUSION

GPs recognize the importance of preventative healthcare and the potential benefit of a new tool that simultaneously predicts risk for those four outcomes. Findings provide important guidance to inform the final development and piloting of this tool with potential to improve efficiency and practical integration of preventative healthcare for dementia risk reduction.

摘要

背景

降低痴呆风险是公共卫生的重点,全科医生(GP)在预防保健中起着关键作用。因此,风险评估工具的设计应考虑到 GP 的偏好和观点。

目的

LEAD!GP 项目旨在调查澳大利亚全科医生对一种新的风险评估工具的设计、使用和实施的偏好和观点,该工具同时计算痴呆、糖尿病、心肌梗死和中风四种结果的风险。

方法

采用半结构化访谈的混合方法,对 30 名澳大利亚全科医生进行了多样化的小组访谈。对访谈记录进行主题分析。对人口统计学和引出分类答案的问题进行描述性分析。

结果

总体而言,GP 认为预防保健很重要,有些医生认为这很有回报,而有些则认为这很困难。GP 目前使用许多风险评估工具。GP 对工具的有用性和负面因素/障碍的看法与临床实践适用性、患者参与度和实际方面有关。最大的障碍是缺乏时间。GP 对四合一工具的概念反应积极,希望它相对较短,得到执业护士和一些患者的支持,与教育资源相关联,有多种格式,并且集成到实践软件中。

结论

GP 认识到预防保健的重要性,以及一种新工具同时预测这四种结果风险的潜在好处。研究结果为最终开发和试用该工具提供了重要指导,有可能提高预防痴呆风险的效率和实际整合。

相似文献

1
Preferences and Perspectives of Australian General Practitioners Towards a New "Four-in-One" Risk Assessment Tool for Preventative Health: The LEAD! GP Project.澳大利亚全科医生对新的“四合一”预防保健风险评估工具的偏好和观点:LEAD!GP 项目。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;94(2):801-814. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230287.
2
Do Australian general practitioners believe practice nurses can take a role in chlamydia testing? A qualitative study of attitudes and opinions.澳大利亚全科医生是否认为执业护士可以在衣原体检测中发挥作用?一项关于态度和观点的定性研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Jan 31;15:31. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-0757-7.
3
The knowledge and attitudes of general practitioners to the assessment and management of pain in people with dementia.全科医生对痴呆症患者疼痛评估与管理的知识和态度。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Oct 10;19(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0853-z.
4
Understanding diagnosis and management of dementia and guideline implementation in general practice: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.理解痴呆的诊断和管理以及在一般实践中实施指南:使用理论领域框架的定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2014 Mar 3;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-31.
5
General practitioners' perceptions of population based bowel screening and their influence on practice: a qualitative study.全科医生对基于人群的肠道筛查的认知及其对医疗实践的影响:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Mar 15;18(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0610-8.
6
The role of older patients' goals in GP decision-making about medicines: a qualitative study.老年患者目标在全科医生药物决策中的作用:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01347-y.
7
Implementation of evidence-based knowledge in general practice.循证医学知识在全科医疗中的应用。
Dan Med J. 2017 Dec;64(12).
8
General practitioners in the field: A qualitative study of general practitioners' experiences in disaster healthcare.现场全科医生:一项对全科医生在灾难医疗保健中经验的定性研究。
Aust J Gen Pract. 2020 Mar;49(3):132-138. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-08-19-5054.
9
Knowledge, attitudes and skills of dementia care in general practice: a cross-sectional study in primary health settings in Beijing, China.全科医生对痴呆症护理的知识、态度和技能:中国北京基层卫生保健环境中的一项横断面研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 May 16;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01164-3.
10
'Working away in that Grey Area…' A qualitative exploration of the challenges general practitioners experience when managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia.“在那个灰色地带努力工作……”一项定性研究,探索全科医生在管理痴呆患者的行为和心理症状时所面临的挑战。
Age Ageing. 2018 Mar 1;47(2):295-303. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx175.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing innovative technology promoting self-awareness of brain health and self-determination in obtaining a timely dementia diagnosis: protocol for a multimethods, concurrent, two-part observational study.实施促进大脑健康自我认知和及时获得痴呆症诊断的自主决策的创新技术:一项多方法、同步、两部分的观察性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 17;15(6):e088182. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088182.
2
A single risk assessment for the most common diseases of ageing, developed and validated on 10 cohort studies.针对最常见的老年疾病进行的单一风险评估,在 10 项队列研究中开发和验证。
BMC Med. 2024 Oct 31;22(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03711-6.