School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Implement Sci. 2014 Mar 3;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-31.
Dementia is a growing problem, causing substantial burden for patients, their families, and society. General practitioners (GPs) play an important role in diagnosing and managing dementia; however, there are gaps between recommended and current practice. The aim of this study was to explore GPs' reported practice in diagnosing and managing dementia and to describe, in theoretical terms, the proposed explanations for practice that was and was not consistent with evidence-based guidelines.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs in Victoria, Australia. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) guided data collection and analysis. Interviews explored the factors hindering and enabling achievement of 13 recommended behaviours. Data were analysed using content and thematic analysis. This paper presents an in-depth description of the factors influencing two behaviours, assessing co-morbid depression using a validated tool, and conducting a formal cognitive assessment using a validated scale.
A total of 30 GPs were interviewed. Most GPs reported that they did not assess for co-morbid depression using a validated tool as per recommended guidance. Barriers included the belief that depression can be adequately assessed using general clinical indicators and that validated tools provide little additional information (theoretical domain of 'Beliefs about consequences'); discomfort in using validated tools ('Emotion'), possibly due to limited training and confidence ('Skills'; 'Beliefs about capabilities'); limited awareness of the need for, and forgetting to conduct, a depression assessment ('Knowledge'; 'Memory, attention and decision processes'). Most reported practising in a manner consistent with the recommendation that a formal cognitive assessment using a validated scale be undertaken. Key factors enabling this were having an awareness of the need to conduct a cognitive assessment ('Knowledge'); possessing the necessary skills and confidence ('Skills'; 'Beliefs about capabilities'); and having adequate time and resources ('Environmental context and resources').
This is the first study to our knowledge to use a theoretical approach to investigate the barriers and enablers to guideline-recommended diagnosis and management of dementia in general practice. It has identified key factors likely to explain GPs' uptake of the guidelines. The results have informed the design of an intervention aimed at supporting practice change in line with dementia guidelines, which is currently being evaluated in a cluster randomised trial.
痴呆症是一个日益严重的问题,给患者、他们的家庭和社会带来了巨大的负担。全科医生(GP)在诊断和管理痴呆症方面发挥着重要作用;然而,推荐的实践和当前的实践之间存在差距。本研究旨在探讨全科医生在诊断和管理痴呆症方面的报告实践,并从理论上描述与循证指南一致和不一致的实践的可能解释。
在澳大利亚维多利亚州对全科医生进行了半结构化访谈。理论领域框架(TDF)指导数据收集和分析。访谈探讨了阻碍和促进实现 13 项推荐行为的因素。使用内容分析和主题分析对数据进行分析。本文详细描述了影响两种行为的因素,即使用经过验证的工具评估共病抑郁症和使用经过验证的量表进行正式认知评估。
共对 30 名全科医生进行了访谈。大多数全科医生报告说,他们没有按照推荐的指南使用经过验证的工具评估共病抑郁症。障碍包括相信可以使用一般临床指标充分评估抑郁症,以及使用经过验证的工具提供的信息很少(“后果信念”理论领域);对使用经过验证的工具感到不适(“情绪”),可能是由于培训和信心有限(“技能”;“能力信念”);对抑郁评估的必要性和遗忘认识有限(“知识”;“记忆、注意力和决策过程”)。大多数人报告说,他们的做法与建议一致,即使用经过验证的量表进行正式认知评估。使这一点成为可能的关键因素是意识到需要进行认知评估(“知识”);具备必要的技能和信心(“技能”;“能力信念”);以及有足够的时间和资源(“环境背景和资源”)。
这是迄今为止第一项使用理论方法调查一般实践中痴呆症诊断和管理的指南推荐的障碍和促进因素的研究。它确定了可能解释全科医生遵循指南的关键因素。研究结果为旨在支持与痴呆症指南一致的实践变革的干预措施的设计提供了信息,该干预措施目前正在一项集群随机试验中进行评估。