Department of Health Sciences, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Meyer Children's University Hospital, IRCCS, Florence, Italy.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2023 Oct;33(10):855-861. doi: 10.1111/pan.14711. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
Monitoring anesthesia depth in children is challenging. Pediatric anesthesiologists estimate general anesthesia depth using indirect methods such as pharmacokinetic models and neurovegetative reflexes. The application of processed electroencephalography may help to identify the correct anesthesia depth (i.e., patient state index between 25 and 50).
To determine the median values of patient state index and spectral edge frequency 95% in children undergoing general anesthesia conducted according to indirect evaluation of depth. The relationships between patient state index and spectral edge frequency 95% and indirect monitoring of anesthesia depth, type of anesthesia, age subgroups, and postoperative delirium were also assessed.
A prospective observational study on children (aged 1-18 years) undergoing surgery longer than 60 min. The SedLine monitor and the novel SedLine pediatric sensors (Masimo Inc., Irvine California) were applied. Patient state index levels were recorded for the duration of the anesthesia until the discharge to the ward at predefined time points.
In the 111 enrolled children, median patient state index level at the end of anesthesia induction was 25 (22-32) and ranged from 26 (23-34) to 28 (25-36) in the maintenance phase. Patient state index at extubation was 48 (35-60) and 69 (62-75) at discharge from the operatory room. Median right/left spectral edge frequency 95% values at the end of induction were 10 (6-14)/9 (5-14) Hz and median right/left spectral edge frequency 95% values in the maintenance phase ranged from 10 (6-14) to 12 (11-15) Hz in both hemispheres. At extubation, right/left spectral edge frequency 95% levels were 18 (15-21)/17 (15-21) Hz. We observed 39 episodes of burst suppression in 20 patients (19%). Median patient state index levels were not different between patients undergoing inhalational and intravenous anesthesia and between those undergoing general anesthesia and general anesthesia added to locoregional anesthesia. Children <2 years displayed significantly higher patient state index levels than older patients (p = .0004). The presence of a burst suppression episode was not associated with PAED levels (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.14-16.74, p` = .18).
NonpEEG-guided anesthesia in children led to median patient state index levels at the low range of recommended unconsciousness values with frequent episodes of burst suppression. Patient state index levels were generally higher in children below 2 years.
监测儿童麻醉深度具有挑战性。小儿麻醉师使用药代动力学模型和神经植物反射等间接方法来估计全身麻醉深度。处理后的脑电图的应用可能有助于确定正确的麻醉深度(即患者状态指数在 25 到 50 之间)。
确定根据深度间接评估进行全身麻醉的儿童的患者状态指数和频谱边缘频率 95%的中位数。还评估了患者状态指数和频谱边缘频率 95%与麻醉深度、麻醉类型、年龄亚组和术后谵妄的间接监测之间的关系。
对接受手术时间超过 60 分钟的 1 至 18 岁儿童进行前瞻性观察性研究。应用 SedLine 监测仪和新型 SedLine 儿科传感器(Masimo Inc.,加利福尼亚州欧文)。在麻醉诱导结束时记录患者状态指数水平,直至在预定义时间点将患儿从手术室出院至病房。
在 111 名入组的儿童中,麻醉诱导结束时患者状态指数中位数为 25(22-32),维持期范围为 26(23-34)至 28(25-36)。拔管时的患者状态指数为 48(35-60),离开手术室时为 69(62-75)。诱导结束时右侧/左侧频谱边缘频率 95%的中位数为 10(6-14)/9(5-14)Hz,维持期右侧/左侧频谱边缘频率 95%的中位数范围为 10(6-14)至 12(11-15)Hz。拔管时,右侧/左侧频谱边缘频率 95%的水平为 18(15-21)/17(15-21)Hz。我们观察到 20 名患儿中有 39 例爆发抑制现象(19%)。接受吸入和静脉麻醉的患儿与接受全身麻醉和全身麻醉联合局部麻醉的患儿的患者状态指数水平无差异。<2 岁的患儿的患者状态指数水平显著高于年龄较大的患儿(p = 0.0004)。爆发抑制事件的存在与 PAED 水平无关(OR 1.58,95%CI 0.14-16.74,p` = 0.18)。
非 EEG 引导的小儿麻醉导致患者状态指数处于推荐无意识值的低值范围,且爆发抑制现象频繁发生。<2 岁的患儿的患者状态指数水平通常较高。