Suppr超能文献

在小儿非心脏手术麻醉期间,对两台经处理的脑电图设备所获得的95%频谱边缘频率(SEF95)进行分析。

Analysis of SEF95 derived from two processed EEG devices during pediatric anesthesia for non-cardiac surgery.

作者信息

Ricci Zaccaria, Gobbi Lorenzo, Rosa Enrica La, Filippini Elena, Lui Matteo, Fischer Maximilan, Colosimo Denise, Romagnoli Stefano

机构信息

Department of Emergency and Critical Care, Anesthesia and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Florence, Italy.

Department of Health Science, Section of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Florence, Piazza di San Marco 4, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s10877-025-01338-3.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the values of spectral edge frequency at the 95th percentile (SEF95) obtained simultaneously by two different processed electroencephalography monitors (BIS and SedLine) in pediatric patients of varying ages undergoing non cardiac surgery to determine whether they remain reproducible regardless of the equipment used. Tertiary Pediatric Hospital. We conducted a prospective observational study involving pediatric patients aged 12 months to 18 years. Patients were excluded if the sensor fit was inadequate or if artifacts interfered with the data collection. Anesthesia was administered by anesthesiologists according to their preferences. A total of 51 children were enrolled, yielding 402 paired BIS/SedLine SEF95 values. These values showed an r² of 0.73 at linear regression analysis (p < 0.0001), with a bias of 0.62 (2.4) Hz and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) ranging from - 4.08 to 5.32 Hz in Bland-Altman analysis. Median SEF95 deltas (i.e., differences of paired BIS/SedLine SEF95 values) across the analyzed time points showed significant differences (p = 0.0017) between values at 15 min and 60 min after skin incision compared to extubation. A delta SEF95 within the ± 2 Hz range was observed in 267 cases (66%), within ± 3 Hz occurred in other 67 measurements (17%) and within ± 4 Hz in further 48 (12%). The remaining 20 measurements showed a higher delta. SedLine SEF95 was higher than BIS in 40 cases, while BIS was higher than SedLine in 96 cases. SEF95 monitored by BIS or SedLine pediatric patients showed some differences, with deltas up to ± 4 Hz. Values appeared to be closer during the anesthesia maintenance phase. The clinical relevance of these findings should be further confirmed.

摘要

本研究旨在比较两种不同处理的脑电图监测仪(脑电双频指数监测仪和 SedLine)同时获得的 95% 频谱边缘频率(SEF95)值,这些监测仪用于不同年龄的小儿患者进行非心脏手术,以确定无论使用何种设备,这些值是否仍具有可重复性。三级儿科医院。我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,纳入了 12 个月至 18 岁的小儿患者。如果传感器贴合不佳或伪迹干扰数据收集,则将患者排除。麻醉由麻醉医生根据他们的偏好进行。总共招募了 51 名儿童,产生了 402 对脑电双频指数监测仪/ SedLine 的 SEF95 值。线性回归分析显示这些值的 r² 为 0.73(p < 0.0001),在 Bland - Altman 分析中偏差为 0.62(2.4)Hz,95% 一致性界限(LoA)范围为 - 4.08 至 5.32 Hz。与拔管相比,在皮肤切开后 15 分钟和 60 分钟时分析时间点的 SEF95 中位数差值(即脑电双频指数监测仪/ SedLine 的 SEF95 配对值的差异)显示出显著差异(p = 0.0017)。在 267 例(66%)中观察到 SEF95 差值在 ±2 Hz 范围内,在另外 67 次测量(17%)中在 ±3 Hz 范围内,在另外 48 例(12%)中在 ±4 Hz 范围内。其余 20 次测量显示出更高的差值。SedLine 的 SEF95 在 40 例中高于脑电双频指数监测仪,而脑电双频指数监测仪在 96 例中高于 SedLine。脑电双频指数监测仪或 SedLine 监测的小儿患者的 SEF95 显示出一些差异,差值高达 ±4 Hz。在麻醉维持阶段,这些值似乎更接近。这些发现的临床相关性应进一步得到证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验