• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经腹与经阴道宫颈长度测量的超声医师内相关性及其与患者特征的相关性。

Intra-Sonographer Correlation Between Transabdominal and Transvaginal Cervical Length Measurements and Associated Patient Demographics.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Ultrasound Med. 2023 Nov;42(11):2583-2588. doi: 10.1002/jum.16293. Epub 2023 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1002/jum.16293
PMID:37334907
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess transvaginal (TV) and transabdominal (TA) cervical length (CL) measurements' variability and patient factors associated with TA CL accuracy. We hypothesized that patient factors would affect the accuracy of TA CL.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study. During anatomy ultrasound, TA and TV CL measurements were obtained, distance from placental edge to internal cervical os assessed, and demographic questionnaires completed. Patients between 18 to 22 weeks and 6 days were included and those <18 year old or with a twin gestation were excluded. TA CL >0.5 cm different from TV length was considered inaccurate.

RESULTS

A total of 530 patients were included. Exactly 18.7% had a prior cesarean, 9.8% a preterm birth, and 2.2% a cervical procedure. Mean age and BMI were 31.1 years and 27.8 kg/m . Median number of living children was one. Median TA and TV CL were 3.42 and 3.53 cm. Exactly 36% (95% CI: 32-40%) of TA CL measurements were inaccurate. CL of 3.4 cm corresponded to a mean difference of zero between TA and TV CL. TA ultrasound had a sensitivity of 25% and a specificity of 98.5% to detect TV CL <2.5 cm. On multivariable analyses, Hispanic ethnicity was associated with inaccurate TA measurement (OR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.24-0.96, P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

On average, TA CL underestimates TV CL when TV CL >3.40 cm and overestimates TV CL when TV CL <3.40 cm. Additional co-variates did not impact accuracy. TA ultrasound has low sensitivity to predict short cervix. Relying solely on TA CL to identify those who need intervention may miss diagnoses. It may be reasonable to develop protocols in which TV CL is used for TA CL <3.4 cm.

摘要

目的

评估经阴道(TV)和经腹部(TA)宫颈长度(CL)测量的变异性以及与 TA CL 准确性相关的患者因素。我们假设患者因素会影响 TA CL 的准确性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性队列研究。在解剖超声检查期间,获取 TA 和 TV CL 测量值,评估胎盘边缘到宫颈内口的距离,并完成人口统计学问卷调查。纳入 18 至 22 周 6 天的患者,排除年龄<18 岁或双胎妊娠的患者。TA CL 比 TV 长度相差>0.5cm 被认为不准确。

结果

共纳入 530 例患者。18.7%有剖宫产史,9.8%有早产史,2.2%有宫颈手术史。平均年龄和 BMI 分别为 31.1 岁和 27.8kg/m2。中位数活产子女数为 1 个。TA 和 TV CL 的中位数分别为 3.42cm 和 3.53cm。36%(95%CI:32-40%)的 TA CL 测量值不准确。CL 为 3.4cm 时,TA 和 TV CL 之间的平均差值为零。TA 超声检测 TV CL <2.5cm 的敏感性为 25%,特异性为 98.5%。多变量分析显示,西班牙裔为 TA 测量不准确的相关因素(OR 0.48,95%CI:0.24-0.96,P=0.04)。

结论

当 TV CL >3.40cm 时,TA CL 平均低估 TV CL,当 TV CL <3.40cm 时,TA CL 平均高估 TV CL。其他协变量不影响准确性。TA 超声检测短宫颈的敏感性低。仅依靠 TA CL 来识别需要干预的患者可能会漏诊。制定仅在 TV CL <3.4cm 时使用 TA CL 的方案可能是合理的。

相似文献

1
Intra-Sonographer Correlation Between Transabdominal and Transvaginal Cervical Length Measurements and Associated Patient Demographics.经腹与经阴道宫颈长度测量的超声医师内相关性及其与患者特征的相关性。
J Ultrasound Med. 2023 Nov;42(11):2583-2588. doi: 10.1002/jum.16293. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
2
Ultrasonographic Transabdominal Measurement of Uterine Cervical Length for the Prediction of a Midtrimester Short Cervix.经腹超声测量子宫颈长度在预测中孕期短子宫颈中的应用。
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Oct;38(12):1303-1307. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712950. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
3
Transabdominal scanning of the cervix at the 20-week morphology scan: comparison with transvaginal cervical measurements in a healthy nulliparous population.孕20周形态学超声检查时经腹扫查宫颈:与健康未生育人群经阴道宫颈测量结果的比较
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Dec;50(6):523-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01225.x. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
4
Can Transabdominal Cervical Length Measurement Exclude Short Cervix?经腹测量宫颈长度能否排除宫颈短的情况?
Am J Perinatol. 2016 Apr;33(5):473-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1566308. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
5
Comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography for the assessment of cervical length in the third trimester of pregnancy.经腹超声与经阴道超声在评估妊娠晚期宫颈长度中的比较。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;58(6):784-787. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.09.009.
6
Comparison between trans-vaginal and trans-abdominal ultrasound examination of the cervix in the second trimester of pregnancy: a prospective study.经阴道与经腹部超声检查在妊娠中期宫颈的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
J Perinat Med. 2023 Nov 10;52(1):76-80. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2023-0103. Print 2024 Jan 29.
7
The reliability of transabdominal cervical length measurement in a low-risk obstetric population: Comparison with transvaginal measurement.低风险产科人群经腹测量宫颈长度的可靠性:与经阴道测量的比较。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;54(2):167-71. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2014.03.007.
8
Ultrasound assessment of cervical length at 18-21 weeks' gestation in an Australian obstetric population: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal approaches.澳大利亚产科人群妊娠18 - 21周时宫颈长度的超声评估:经腹与经阴道途径的比较
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Jun;54(3):250-5. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12204. Epub 2014 Apr 5.
9
It is about time. The advantage of transabdominal cervical length screening.是时候了。经腹宫颈长度筛查的优势。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(24):4797-4802. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1864317. Epub 2020 Dec 20.
10
Correlation Between Cervical Lengths Measured by Transabdominal and Transvaginal Sonography for Predicting Preterm Birth.经腹超声与经阴道超声测量宫颈长度预测早产的相关性
J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Mar;35(3):537-44. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.03026. Epub 2016 Feb 18.