Author Affiliations: Traumatic Brain Injury Network (TBIN), School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environment Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand (Dr Theadom); School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand (Dr Barker-Collo); National Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand (Dr Parag); Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health & Development Research Unit, University of Otago, Otago, New Zealand (Mr Hogan and Drs Ramrakha and Poulton); and Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Drs Caspi and Moffitt).
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2024;39(2):E70-E82. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000875. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
To determine whether differences exist in mid-adulthood cognitive functioning in people with and without history of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).
Community-based study.
People born between April 1, 1972, and March 31, 1973, recruited into the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Longitudinal Study, who completed neuropsychological assessments in mid-adulthood. Participants who had experienced a moderate or severe TBI or mTBI in the past 12 months were excluded.
Longitudinal, prospective, observational study.
Data were collected on sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, childhood cognition (between 7 and 11 years), and alcohol and substance dependence (from 21 years of age). mTBI history was determined from accident and medical records (from birth to 45 years of age). Participants were classified as having 1 mTBI and more in their lifetime or no mTBI. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) and Trail Making Tests A and B (between 38 and 45 years of age) were used to assess cognitive functioning. T tests and effect sizes were used to identify any differences on cognitive functioning domains between the mTBI and no mTBI groups. Regression models explored the relative contribution of number of mTBIs and age of first mTBI and sociodemographic/lifestyle variables on cognitive functioning.
Of the 885 participants, 518 (58.5%) had experienced at least 1 mTBI over their lifetime, with a mean number of 2.5 mTBIs. The mTBI group had significantly slower processing speed ( P < .01, d = 0.23) in mid-adulthood than the no TBI controls, with a medium effect size. However, the relationship no longer remained significant after controlling for childhood cognition, sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. No significant differences were observed for overall intelligence, verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, working memory, attention, or cognitive flexibility. Childhood cognition was not linked to likelihood of sustaining mTBI later in life.
mTBI histories in the general population were not associated with lower cognitive functioning in mid-adulthood once sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were taken into account.
确定是否存在既往轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)人群与无 mTBI 人群中年期认知功能的差异。
基于社区的研究。
1972 年 4 月 1 日至 1973 年 3 月 31 日出生的人,入选 Dunedin 多学科健康和发展纵向研究,在中年期完成神经心理学评估。过去 12 个月中经历过中度或重度 TBI 或 mTBI 的参与者被排除在外。
纵向、前瞻性、观察性研究。
收集社会人口统计学特征、病史、儿童认知(7 至 11 岁)、酒精和物质依赖(21 岁开始)的数据。mTBI 病史通过事故和医疗记录确定(从出生到 45 岁)。参与者分为一生中经历过 1 次或多次 mTBI 和无 mTBI。韦氏成人智力量表(WAIS-IV)和走迷宫测试 A 和 B(38 至 45 岁)用于评估认知功能。采用 t 检验和效应量比较 mTBI 组和无 mTBI 组认知功能领域的差异。回归模型探讨 mTBI 次数、首次 mTBI 年龄和社会人口统计学/生活方式变量对认知功能的相对贡献。
在 885 名参与者中,518 名(58.5%)一生中至少经历过 1 次 mTBI,平均 mTBI 次数为 2.5 次。mTBI 组中年期处理速度明显较慢(P<.01,d=0.23),具有中等效应量。然而,在校正儿童认知、社会人口统计学和生活方式因素后,这种关系不再显著。整体智力、言语理解、知觉推理、工作记忆、注意力或认知灵活性无显著差异。儿童认知与成年后患 mTBI 的可能性无关。
考虑到社会人口统计学和生活方式因素后,一般人群的 mTBI 病史与中年期较低的认知功能无关。