Jones H A, Davies E E, Hughes J M
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1986 Jul;61(1):75-80. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1986.61.1.75.
Mixing for two gases of markedly different gaseous diffusivity, helium (He) (mol wt = 4) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) (mol wt = 146) has been studied by a rebreathing method in different postures. In nine normal subjects duplicate measurements were made in the erect (seated), supine, and lateral decubitus posture, at a constant tidal volume (700 ml) and frequency (1 Hz) starting from functional residual capacity (FRC). Additional measurements were made on four of the subjects, rebreathing seated erect at a volume similar to the relaxed FRC supine and supine at a volume similar to the relaxed FRC seated. In the supine posture the mean breath number to reach 99% equilibrium (n99), was not significantly different for the two gases, 8.9 for He and 9.8 for SF6. There was a difference (P less than 0.01) when erect; n99 (He) = 8.2 and n99 (SF6) = 10.9. The greatest He-SF6 difference (P less than 0.001) was in the lateral decubitus position n99 (He) = 10.1 and n99 (SF6) = 15.9. The mean relaxed FRC as percent of seated was 71% supine and 75% in lateral decubitus posture. Rebreathing seated at a lower volume did not abolish the He-SF6 mixing difference nor did rebreathing at a higher volume when supine induce a He-SF6 mixing difference. Thus the effect of posture on gas mixing cannot be due solely to lung volume and must represent a convective and diffusive dependent change in the distribution of ventilation per unit lung volume.
采用重复呼吸法,对两种气体扩散率显著不同的气体——氦气(He)(分子量 = 4)和六氟化硫(SF₆)(分子量 = 146)在不同体位下的混合情况进行了研究。对9名正常受试者,在从功能残气量(FRC)开始,以恒定潮气量(700 ml)和频率(1 Hz)的情况下,分别在直立(坐位)、仰卧位和侧卧位进行了重复测量。对其中4名受试者还进行了额外测量,即分别在与仰卧位放松时FRC相似的体积下坐位重复呼吸,以及在与坐位放松时FRC相似的体积下仰卧位重复呼吸。在仰卧位时,两种气体达到99%平衡的平均呼吸次数(n99)没有显著差异,氦气为8.9次,六氟化硫为9.8次。在直立位时存在差异(P<0.01);n99(He) = 8.2,n99(SF₆) = 10.9。氦气与六氟化硫的最大差异(P<0.001)出现在侧卧位,n99(He) = 10.1,n99(SF₆) = 15.9。仰卧位时平均放松FRC占坐位的百分比为71%,侧卧位时为75%。在较低体积下坐位重复呼吸并不能消除氦气与六氟化硫的混合差异,仰卧位时在较高体积下重复呼吸也不会诱发氦气与六氟化硫的混合差异。因此,体位对气体混合的影响不能仅仅归因于肺容积,而必定代表了单位肺容积通气分布中对流和扩散依赖性的变化。