Hwang InKyung, Kim Tae-Il, Cho Young-Dan
Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University and Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2024 Feb;54(1):44-52. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2300820041. Epub 2023 May 30.
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a single type of narrow-diameter implant (NDI) by investigating its survival rate and peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL). In addition, variables possibly related to implant survival and MBL were investigated to identify potential risk factors.
The study was conducted as a retrospective study involving 49 patients who had received 3.0-mm diameter TSIII implants (Osstem Implant Co.) at Seoul National University Dental Hospital. In total, 64 implants were included, and dental records and radiographic data were collected from 2017 to 2022. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and a Cox proportional hazard model were used to estimate the implant survival rate and to investigate the effects of age, sex, jaw, implant location, implant length, the stage of surgery, guided bone regeneration, type of implant placement, and the surgeon's proficiency (resident or professor) on implant survival. The MBL of the NDIs was measured, and the factors influencing MBL were evaluated.
The mean observation period was 30.5 months (interquartile range, 26.75-45 months), and 6 out of 64 implants failed. The survival rate of the NDIs was 90.6%, and the multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that age was associated with implant failure (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.31, =0.01). The mean MBL was 0.44±0.75 mm, and no factors showed statistically significant associations with greater MBL.
NDIs can be considered a primary alternative when standard-diameter implants are unsuitable. However, further studies are required to confirm their long-term stability.
本研究旨在通过调查单一类型窄直径种植体(NDI)的生存率和种植体周围边缘骨丢失(MBL)情况来评估其临床效果。此外,还对可能与种植体生存和MBL相关的变量进行了研究,以确定潜在风险因素。
本研究为回顾性研究,纳入了49例在首尔国立大学牙科学院接受直径3.0毫米TSIII种植体(奥齿泰种植体有限公司)的患者。共纳入64枚种植体,收集了2017年至2022年的牙科记录和影像学数据。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和Cox比例风险模型来估计种植体生存率,并研究年龄、性别、颌骨、种植体位置、种植体长度、手术阶段、引导骨再生、种植体植入类型以及外科医生的专业水平(住院医生或教授)对种植体生存的影响。测量了NDI的MBL,并评估了影响MBL的因素。
平均观察期为30.5个月(四分位间距为26.75 - 45个月),64枚种植体中有6枚失败。NDI的生存率为90.6%,多因素Cox回归分析显示年龄与种植体失败相关(风险比为1.17;95%置信区间为1.04 - 1.31,P = 0.01)。平均MBL为0.44±0.75毫米,没有因素显示与更大的MBL有统计学上的显著关联。
当标准直径种植体不合适时,NDI可被视为主要替代方案。然而,需要进一步研究来证实其长期稳定性。