• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 COVID-19 大流行期间荷兰普通实践中提供戒烟咨询-建议-转介服务:一项实施前后研究的结果。

The delivery of Ask-Advise-Connect for smoking cessation in Dutch general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of a pre-post implementation study.

机构信息

The Netherlands Expertise Centre for Tobacco Control, Trimbos Institute, PO Box 725, 3500 AS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 19;23(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09692-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-09692-1
PMID:37337250
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10280870/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Ask-Advise-Connect approach can help primary care providers to increase the number of smokers that attempt to quit smoking and enrol into cessation counselling. The approach has not yet been implemented in general practice in the Netherlands. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of a comprehensive implementation strategy on the delivery of Ask-Advise-Connect for smoking cessation within Dutch general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

A pre-post study was conducted between late 2020 and early 2022, and included 106 Dutch primary care providers (GPs, practice nurses and doctor's assistants). Participation lasted nine months: during the first three months participants delivered smoking cessation care as usual (pre-intervention); the implementation strategy came into effect after three months and participants were followed up for another six months (post-intervention). The implementation strategy consisted of two meetings in which participants were educated about Ask-Advise-Connect, made agreements on the implementation of Ask-Advise-Connect and reflected on these agreements. Participants also received online educational materials and a desk card as reminder. The changes in the proportions of 'Ask' and 'Advise' over time were modelled using linear mixed effects models. A descriptive analysis was conducted with regard to referrals to cessation counselling.

RESULTS

Participants provided consultations to 29,112 patients (both smokers and non-smokers). Results of the linear mixed effects model show that the proportion of patients that were asked about smoking ('Ask') significantly decreased in the first three months (pre-intervention), but slightly increased again after the implementation strategy came into effect (post-intervention). No significant change over time was found with regard to the proportion of patients advised to quit smoking ('Advise'). Descriptive statistics suggested that more participants proactively (vs. passively) referred patients to cessation counselling post-intervention ('Connect').

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that a comprehensive implementation strategy can support primary care providers in offering smoking cessation care to patients, even under stressful COVID-19 conditions. Additional implementation efforts are needed to increase the proportion of patients that receive a quit advice and proactive referral.

摘要

背景

“询问-建议-转介”方法可以帮助初级保健提供者增加尝试戒烟并接受戒烟咨询的吸烟者人数。该方法尚未在荷兰的常规实践中实施。本研究旨在调查在 COVID-19 大流行期间,一种综合实施策略对荷兰常规实践中提供戒烟“询问-建议-转介”服务的影响。

方法

本研究采用前后测设计,于 2020 年末至 2022 年初进行,共纳入 106 名荷兰初级保健提供者(全科医生、执业护士和医生助理)。参与时间为 9 个月:在最初的 3 个月内,参与者提供常规的戒烟护理(干预前);在 3 个月后实施该策略,并在接下来的 6 个月内进行随访(干预后)。该实施策略包括两次会议,参与者在会议中接受关于“询问-建议-转介”的教育,就实施“询问-建议-转介”达成协议,并对这些协议进行反思。参与者还收到了在线教育材料和名片作为提醒。采用线性混合效应模型对“询问”和“建议”比例随时间的变化进行建模。关于转介至戒烟咨询的情况进行了描述性分析。

结果

参与者共为 29112 名患者(包括吸烟者和非吸烟者)提供了咨询。线性混合效应模型的结果显示,在最初的 3 个月(干预前)中,被问及吸烟情况的患者比例(“询问”)显著下降,但在实施策略生效后又略有上升(干预后)。在建议患者戒烟的比例(“建议”)方面,未发现随时间的显著变化。描述性统计结果表明,更多的参与者在干预后更主动(而非被动)地将患者转介至戒烟咨询(“转介”)。

结论

这些发现表明,综合实施策略可以支持初级保健提供者为患者提供戒烟护理,即使在 COVID-19 压力大的情况下也是如此。需要进一步的实施努力,以提高接受戒烟建议和主动转介的患者比例。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dddc/10280870/2de34070ab83/12913_2023_9692_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dddc/10280870/36574297abeb/12913_2023_9692_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dddc/10280870/160e58ed92f3/12913_2023_9692_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dddc/10280870/2de34070ab83/12913_2023_9692_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dddc/10280870/36574297abeb/12913_2023_9692_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dddc/10280870/160e58ed92f3/12913_2023_9692_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dddc/10280870/2de34070ab83/12913_2023_9692_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The delivery of Ask-Advise-Connect for smoking cessation in Dutch general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of a pre-post implementation study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间荷兰普通实践中提供戒烟咨询-建议-转介服务:一项实施前后研究的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 19;23(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09692-1.
2
Implementation of ask-advise-connect for smoking cessation in Dutch general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods evaluation using the CFIR framework.在 COVID-19 大流行期间荷兰普通实践中实施戒烟的询问-建议-联系:使用 CFIR 框架的混合方法评估。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023 May 9;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00535-0.
3
The implementation of ask-advise-connect in a federally qualified health center: a mixed methods evaluation using the re-aim framework.在一家联邦合格健康中心实施“问-建议-联系”:使用再瞄准框架的混合方法评估。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Aug 11;13(8):551-560. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad007.
4
Ask-Advise-Connect: a new approach to smoking treatment delivery in health care settings.咨询-建议-转介:一种在医疗环境中实施吸烟治疗的新方法。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 25;173(6):458-64. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3751.
5
Facilitating smoking cessation in patients who smoke: a large-scale cross-sectional comparison of fourteen groups of healthcare providers.促进吸烟患者戒烟:十四组医疗保健提供者的大规模横断面比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 25;19(1):750. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4527-x.
6
The Ask-Advise-Connect approach for smokers in a safety net healthcare system: a group-randomized trial.在一个医疗保障体系中,针对吸烟者的询问-建议-联系方法:一项群组随机试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Dec;45(6):737-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.07.011.
7
8
Smoking cessation strategy in the national cervical cancer screening program (SUCCESS): study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised trial and process evaluation in Dutch general practice.国家宫颈癌筛查计划(SUCCESS)中的戒烟策略:荷兰普通实践中一项实用型整群随机试验和过程评估的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 4;12(4):e055812. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055812.
9
Implementation of Ask-Advise-Connect in a safety net healthcare system: quitline treatment engagement and smoking cessation outcomes.在一个安全网医疗体系中实施问-议-转:戒烟热线治疗参与和戒烟结果。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Feb 3;10(1):163-167. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby108.
10
Seeing New Opportunities to Help Smokers Quit: A UK National Survey of Optometrist-Delivered Smoking Cessation Behavioral Support Interventions.看到帮助吸烟者戒烟的新机会:英国全国范围内视光师提供的戒烟行为支持干预措施调查。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Apr 17;21(5):655-662. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty066.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimizing Smoking Cessation Counseling in a University Hospital: Results and Pitfalls.优化大学医院的戒烟咨询:结果与陷阱
Front Health Serv. 2022 Jul 8;2:882964. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.882964. eCollection 2022.
2
Mentioning smoking cessation assistance during healthcare consultations matters: findings from Dutch survey research.在医疗保健咨询中提及戒烟辅助很重要:来自荷兰调查研究的结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Oct 3;32(5):747-752. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac106.
3
Active Ingredients of Interventions Improving Smoking Cessation Support by Dutch Primary Care Providers: A Systematic Review.
干预措施中提高荷兰初级保健提供者戒烟支持的有效成分:系统评价。
Eval Health Prof. 2023 Mar;46(1):3-22. doi: 10.1177/01632787221099941. Epub 2022 May 20.
4
GP wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.在 COVID-19 大流行期间全科医生的幸福感:系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Apr 28;72(718):e325-e333. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0680. Print 2022 May.
5
Strategies to improve smoking cessation rates in primary care.提高初级保健中戒烟率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2.
6
The referral of patients to smoking cessation counselling: perceptions and experiences of healthcare providers in general practice.将患者转介至戒烟咨询:全科医生对其的看法和经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 17;21(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06618-7.
7
The effect of smoking on COVID-19 severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.吸烟对 COVID-19 严重程度的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Virol. 2021 Feb;93(2):1045-1056. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26389. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
8
12-Month Evaluation of an EHR-Supported Staff Role Change for Provision of Tobacco Cessation Care in 8 Primary Care Safety-Net Clinics.12 个月的电子健康记录支持的员工角色转变评估,以在 8 家初级保健保障诊所提供戒烟护理。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(11):3234-3242. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06030-7. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
9
Facilitating smoking cessation in patients who smoke: a large-scale cross-sectional comparison of fourteen groups of healthcare providers.促进吸烟患者戒烟:十四组医疗保健提供者的大规模横断面比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 25;19(1):750. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4527-x.
10
Specifying and comparing implementation strategies across seven large implementation interventions: a practical application of theory.在七个大型实施干预措施中指定和比较实施策略:理论的实际应用。
Implement Sci. 2019 Mar 21;14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0876-4.