The Netherlands Expertise Centre for Tobacco Control, Trimbos Institute, PO Box 725, 3500 AS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 17;21(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06618-7.
Few European smokers receive professional counselling when attempting to quit smoking, resulting in suboptimal success rates and poor health outcomes. Healthcare providers in general practice play an important role in referring smokers to smoking cessation counselling. We chose the Netherlands as a case study to qualitatively explore which factors play a role among healthcare providers in general practice with regard to referral for smoking cessation counselling organised both inside and outside general practice.
We conducted four focus groups and 18 telephone interviews, with a total of 31 healthcare providers who work in general practice. Qualitative content analysis was used to identify relevant factors related to referral behaviours, and each factor was linked to one of the three main components of the COM-B behaviour model (i.e., capability, opportunity and motivation) as well as the six sub-components of the model.
Dutch healthcare providers in general practice typically refer smokers who want to quit to counselling inside their own general practice without actively discussing other counselling options, indicating a lack of shared decision making. The analysis showed that factors linked to the COM-B main components 'capability' and 'opportunity', such as healthcare providers' skills and patients' preferences, play a role in whether patients are referred to counselling inside general practice. Factors linked to all three COM-B components were found to play a role in referrals to counselling outside general practice. These included (knowledge of) the availability and quality of counselling in the region, patients' requests, reimbursement, and sense of urgency to refer. The identified factors can both act as barriers and facilitators.
The findings of this research suggest that more smokers can be reached with smoking cessation counselling if implementation interventions focus on: (i) equipping healthcare providers with the knowledge and skills needed to refer patients; (ii) creating more opportunities for healthcare providers to refer patients (e.g., by improving the availability and reimbursement of counselling options); and (iii) motivating healthcare providers to discuss different counselling options with patients.
在试图戒烟的欧洲吸烟者中,很少有人接受专业咨询,导致戒烟成功率低,健康状况不佳。全科医生在向吸烟者转介戒烟咨询方面发挥着重要作用。我们选择荷兰作为案例研究,定性探讨全科医生在向吸烟者转介戒烟咨询方面的相关因素,这些咨询包括在全科医生内部和外部组织的咨询。
我们共进行了 4 次焦点小组和 18 次电话访谈,共有 31 名在全科医生工作的医疗保健提供者参与。使用定性内容分析来确定与转介行为相关的相关因素,每个因素都与行为模型(即能力、机会和动机)的三个主要组成部分以及模型的六个子组件中的一个相关联。
荷兰全科医生通常会将有戒烟意愿的吸烟者转介到自己的常规实践中进行咨询,而不会积极讨论其他咨询选择,这表明缺乏共同决策。分析表明,与 COM-B 主要组成部分“能力”和“机会”相关的因素,如医疗保健提供者的技能和患者的偏好,在患者是否被转介到常规实践中接受咨询方面发挥作用。与所有三个 COM-B 组成部分都相关的因素在向常规实践以外的咨询转介中发挥作用。这些因素包括(对)该地区咨询的可用性和质量的了解、患者的要求、报销以及转介的紧迫性。确定的因素既可以成为障碍,也可以成为促进因素。
如果实施干预措施侧重于以下几点,那么可以为更多吸烟者提供戒烟咨询服务:(i)为医疗保健提供者提供转介患者所需的知识和技能;(ii)为医疗保健提供者创造更多转介患者的机会(例如,通过提高咨询选择的可用性和报销);(iii)激励医疗保健提供者与患者讨论不同的咨询选择。