Department of Anesthesiology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2023;20:19. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.19. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
This study investigated the effect of evaluations based on the Anesthetic List Management Assessment Tool (ALMAT) form on improving the technical and non-technical skills of final-year nurse anesthesia students at Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (AJUMS).
This was a semi-experimental study with a pre-test and post-test design. It included 45 final-year nurse anesthesia students of AJUMS and lasted for 3 months. The technical and non-technical skills of the intervention group were assessed at 4 university hospitals using formative-feedback evaluation based on the ALMAT form, from induction of anesthesia until reaching mastery and independence. Finally, the students’ degree of improvement in technical and non-technical skills was compared between the intervention and control groups. Statistical tests (the independent t-test, paired t-test, and Mann-Whitney test) were used to analyze the data.
The rate of improvement in post-test scores of technical skills was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P<0.0001). Similarly, the students in the intervention group received significantly higher post-test scores for non-technical skills than the students in the control group (P<0.0001).
The findings of this study showed that the use of ALMAT as a formative-feedback evaluation method to evaluate technical and non-technical skills had a significant effect on improving these skills and was effective in helping students learn and reach mastery and independence.
本研究旨在探讨基于麻醉清单管理评估工具(ALMAT)表格的评估对提高阿瓦兹 Jundishapur 医科大学(AJUMS)护理麻醉专业最后一年学生的技术和非技术技能的影响。
这是一项半实验研究,采用前后测试设计。研究对象为 AJUMS 的 45 名护理麻醉专业最后一年的学生,持续 3 个月。采用基于 ALMAT 表格的形成性反馈评估,对干预组学生在 4 家大学医院的技术和非技术技能进行评估,从麻醉诱导直至达到掌握和独立水平。最后,比较干预组和对照组学生技术和非技术技能的提高程度。采用独立样本 t 检验、配对 t 检验和曼-惠特尼检验对数据进行统计分析。
干预组学生技术技能后测得分的提高率明显高于对照组(P<0.0001)。同样,干预组学生的非技术技能后测得分也明显高于对照组(P<0.0001)。
本研究结果表明,使用 ALMAT 作为形成性反馈评估方法来评估技术和非技术技能,对提高这些技能有显著效果,并有助于学生学习和达到掌握和独立水平。