Suppr超能文献

局部麻醉剂中添加佐剂对单次上肢周围区域阻滞麻醉效果的影响:一项随机试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

The effect of adjuvants added to local anaesthetics for single-injection upper extremity peripheral regional anaesthesia: A systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomised trials.

机构信息

From the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg (A-KS, VS, JS, TW, HW, LE, H-CD), and the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Diakoneo Diak Klinikum Schwäbisch-Hall, Schwäbisch-Hall, Germany (TW).

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023 Sep 1;40(9):672-690. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001860. Epub 2023 Jun 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peripheral regional anaesthesia is frequently used for upper extremity surgery. To prolong the duration of analgesia, adjuvants can be added to single-injection local anaesthetics. Despite attempts to compare several adjuvants in pairwise meta-analyses, a comprehensive comparison is still missing.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this network meta-analysis was to determine the effectiveness of adjuvants in upper extremity peripheral nerve blocks.

DESIGN

A systematic review of randomised controlled trials with network meta-analyses.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search in Embase, CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Web of Science was performed up to March 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing different adjuvants injected perineurally in peripheral upper extremity nerve blocks were eligible. Frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model with physiological saline as the comparator. The primary endpoint was the ratio of means (ROM) of the duration of analgesia.

RESULTS

The review included 242 randomised controlled trials with a total of 17 391 patients. Twenty-eight adjuvants were compared in the largest networks. Most network estimations consisted of a high proportion of direct evidence. Fourteen adjuvants increased the duration of analgesia significantly by the following factors, ROM [95% confidence interval (CI)]: dexamethasone 1.95 (1.79 to 2.13), buprenorphine 1.83 (1.51 to 2.24), butorphanol 1.84 (1.41 to 2.39), potassium chloride 1.89 (1.15 to 3.11), dexmedetomidine 1.70 (1.59 to 1.81), sufentanil 1.70 (1.27 to 2.29), ketorolac 1.68 (1.24 to 2.27), midazolam 1.55 (1.24 to 1.94), tramadol 1.52 (1.32 to 1.75), nalbuphine 1.50 (1.30 to 1.72), morphine 1.43 (1.09 to 1.88), magnesium sulfate 1.42 (1.20 to 1.67), clonidine 1.36 (1.24 to 1.50) and fentanyl 1.23 (1.08 to 1.40). Inconsistency in network meta-analysis was substantial. Overall side effect rates were low with all adjuvants.

CONCLUSION

The best interventions to prolong the duration of analgesia were dexamethasone, followed by dexmedetomidine, opioids, electrolytes, ketorolac and midazolam. There are general concerns about the quality of underlying studies and the risk of publication bias.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018115722.

摘要

背景

外周区域麻醉常用于上肢手术。为了延长镇痛持续时间,可以向单次注射局部麻醉剂中添加佐剂。尽管尝试在成对的荟萃分析中比较了几种佐剂,但仍缺乏全面的比较。

目的

本网络荟萃分析旨在确定上肢周围神经阻滞中佐剂的有效性。

设计

一项系统的随机对照试验综述,结合网络荟萃分析。

数据来源

2023 年 3 月前,在 Embase、CENTRAL、MEDLINE 和 Web of Science 中进行文献检索。

入选标准

比较外周上肢神经阻滞中环状神经周围注射不同佐剂的随机对照试验符合入选标准。使用随机效应模型进行基于似然法的网络荟萃分析,生理盐水作为对照。主要终点是镇痛持续时间的比值均数(ROM)。

结果

综述纳入了 242 项随机对照试验,共计 17391 名患者。在最大的网络中比较了 28 种佐剂。大多数网络估计都包含大量直接证据。有 14 种佐剂通过以下因素显著增加了镇痛持续时间,ROM[95%置信区间(CI)]:地塞米松 1.95(1.79 至 2.13)、丁丙诺啡 1.83(1.51 至 2.24)、布托啡诺 1.84(1.41 至 2.39)、氯化钾 1.89(1.15 至 3.11)、右美托咪定 1.70(1.59 至 1.81)、舒芬太尼 1.70(1.27 至 2.29)、酮咯酸 1.68(1.24 至 2.27)、咪达唑仑 1.55(1.24 至 1.94)、曲马多 1.52(1.32 至 1.75)、纳布啡 1.50(1.30 至 1.72)、吗啡 1.43(1.09 至 1.88)、硫酸镁 1.42(1.20 至 1.67)、可乐定 1.36(1.24 至 1.50)和芬太尼 1.23(1.08 至 1.40)。网络荟萃分析中的不一致性很大。所有佐剂的总体副作用发生率都很低。

结论

延长镇痛持续时间的最佳干预措施是地塞米松,其次是右美托咪定、阿片类药物、电解质、酮咯酸和咪达唑仑。基础研究的质量和发表偏倚的风险存在普遍担忧。

试验注册

PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018115722。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验