Department of Psychiatry, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Neuroscience Education Institute, Lakewood Ranch, Florida, USA.
Product Development, Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Jersey City, New Jersey, USA.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2023 Jun;33(5):176-182. doi: 10.1089/cap.2023.0005.
Amphetamines are a preferred treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), with the dextroamphetamine transdermal system (d-ATS) providing an alternative to oral formulations. A pivotal trial of d-ATS in children and adolescents with ADHD met primary and key secondary endpoints. This analysis reports additional endpoints and safety findings from the pivotal trial and evaluates effect size and number needed to treat (NNT) for d-ATS. In this study, a 5-week, open-label dose-optimization period (DOP) preceded a 2-week, randomized, crossover double-blind treatment period (DBP). Eligible patients received d-ATS 5 mg during the DOP, with weekly evaluations for increase to 10, 15, and 20 mg (equivalent to labeled doses of 4.5, 9, 13.5, and 18 mg/9 hours, respectively) until reaching and maintaining the optimal dose, which was utilized for the DBP. Secondary endpoints included assessment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV), Conners' Parent Rating Scale Revised Short Form (CPRS-R:S), and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores. NNT was calculated for ADHD-RS-IV and CGI-Improvement (CGI-I). Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and dermal safety. In total, 110 patients entered the DOP, with 106 patients randomized (DBP). During the DBP, the least-squares mean (95% confidence interval) difference for d-ATS versus placebo in ADHD-RS-IV total score was -13.1 (-16.2 to -10.0; < 0.001), with effect size of 1.1 and NNT of 3 for ADHD-RS-IV remission, ≥30% improvement, and ≥50% improvement. Significant differences between placebo and d-ATS were also observed for CPRS-R:S and CGI-I scales ( < 0.001), with NNT of 2 for CGI-I response. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate, with three leading to study discontinuation in the DOP and none in the DBP. No patients discontinued due to dermal reactions. d-ATS was effective in treating ADHD in children and adolescents, meeting all secondary endpoints, with a large effect size and NNT of 2-3 to achieve a clinically meaningful response. d-ATS was safe and well tolerated, with minimal dermal reactions. NCT01711021.
安非他命是治疗注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的首选药物,右旋苯丙胺透皮系统(d-ATS)为口服制剂提供了替代选择。一项关键的 d-ATS 治疗儿童和青少年 ADHD 的试验达到了主要和关键次要终点。本分析报告了来自关键试验的其他终点和安全性发现,并评估了 d-ATS 的效应大小和需要治疗的人数(NNT)。在这项研究中,进行了为期 5 周的开放性剂量优化期(DOP),随后进行了为期 2 周的随机、交叉双盲治疗期(DBP)。符合条件的患者在 DOP 期间接受 d-ATS 5mg,每周评估增加至 10、15 和 20mg(分别相当于标签剂量的 4.5、9、13.5 和 18mg/9 小时),直到达到并维持最佳剂量,该剂量用于 DBP。次要终点包括评估注意力缺陷多动障碍评定量表第四版(ADHD-RS-IV)、康纳父母评定量表修订短表(CPRS-R:S)和临床总体印象(CGI)评分。为 ADHD-RS-IV 和 CGI-改善(CGI-I)计算了 NNT。安全性评估包括治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAEs)和皮肤安全性。总共有 110 名患者进入 DOP,其中 106 名患者被随机分配(DBP)。在 DBP 期间,d-ATS 与安慰剂在 ADHD-RS-IV 总分上的最小二乘均数(95%置信区间)差异为-13.1(-16.2 至-10.0;<0.001),效应大小为 1.1,NNT 为 3,用于 ADHD-RS-IV 缓解、≥30%改善和≥50%改善。CPRS-R:S 和 CGI-I 量表也观察到安慰剂和 d-ATS 之间的显著差异(<0.001),CGI-I 反应的 NNT 为 2。大多数 TEAEs 为轻度或中度,有 3 例导致 DOP 中研究中止,而 DBP 中没有。没有患者因皮肤反应而退出。d-ATS 在治疗儿童和青少年 ADHD 方面有效,达到了所有次要终点,具有较大的效应大小和 NNT 为 2-3,以达到有临床意义的反应。d-ATS 安全且耐受良好,皮肤反应极小。NCT01711021。