Centre for Therapeutic Innovation, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, United Kingdom.
Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Aug;24(8):1253-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.05.014. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
Anticholinergic burden is detrimental to cognitive health. Multiple studies found that a high anticholinergic burden is associated with an increased risk for dementia, changes to the brain structure, function, and cognitive decline. We performed a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled deprescribing trial. We compared the effect of the intervention on baseline anticholinergic burden across the treatment and control groups and the time of recruitment before and after a lockdown due to the COVID pandemic with subgroup analyses by baseline frailty index.
Randomized controlled trial.
We analyzed data from a de-prescribing trial of older adults (>65 years) previously conducted in New Zealand that was focused on reducing the Drug Burden Index (DBI).
We used the anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) to quantify the impact of the intervention on reducing the anticholinergic burden. Participants not taking anticholinergics at the start of the trial were excluded. The primary outcome for this subgroup analysis was a change in ACB, measured with the ĝ statistic describing the difference in standard deviation units of this change between intervention and control. For this analysis, the trial participants were stratified into low, medium, and high frailty and timing into prior- and post-lockdown (public health measures for COVID-19).
Among the 295 participants in this analysis, the median (IQR) age was 79 (74, 85), and 67% were women. For the primary outcome ĝ = -0.04 (95% CI -0.26 to 0.19) with a -0.23 mean reduction in ACB in the intervention arm and -0.19 in the control arm. Before lockdown ĝ = -0.38 (95% CI -0.84 to 0.04) and post-lockdown ĝ = 0.07 (95% CI -0.19 to 0.33). The mean change in ACB for each of the frailty strata was as follows: low frailty (-0.02; 95% CI -0.65 to 0.18); medium frailty (0.05; 95% CI -0.28 to 0.38); high frailty (0.08; 95% CI -0.40 to 0.56).
The study did not provide evidence for the effect of pharmacist deprescribing intervention on reducing the anticholinergic burden. However, this post hoc analysis examined the impact of COVID on the effectiveness of the intervention, and further research in this area may be warranted.
抗胆碱能负担对认知健康有害。多项研究发现,高抗胆碱能负担与痴呆风险增加、大脑结构、功能和认知能力下降有关。我们对一项随机对照减药试验进行了事后分析。我们比较了干预组和对照组在治疗前和新冠肺炎大流行封锁后招募时间的基线抗胆碱能负担,同时按基线脆弱指数进行了亚组分析。
随机对照试验。
我们分析了先前在新西兰进行的一项针对老年人(>65 岁)的减药试验的数据,该试验专注于降低药物负担指数(DBI)。
我们使用抗胆碱能认知负担(ACB)来量化干预措施对降低抗胆碱能负担的影响。在试验开始时不服用抗胆碱能药物的参与者被排除在外。本次亚组分析的主要结局是使用 ĝ 统计量描述干预组和对照组之间这种变化的标准差单位差异来衡量 ACB 的变化。对于这项分析,试验参与者被分为低、中、高脆弱组,时间分为封锁前(新冠肺炎公共卫生措施)和封锁后。
在这项分析的 295 名参与者中,中位(IQR)年龄为 79(74,85),67%为女性。对于主要结局 ĝ= -0.04(95%CI-0.26 至 0.19),干预组的 ACB 平均降低 0.23,对照组降低 0.19。封锁前 ĝ= -0.38(95%CI-0.84 至 0.04),封锁后 ĝ=0.07(95%CI-0.19 至 0.33)。每个脆弱分层的 ACB 平均变化如下:低脆弱度(-0.02;95%CI-0.65 至 0.18);中等脆弱度(0.05;95%CI-0.28 至 0.38);高脆弱度(0.08;95%CI-0.40 至 0.56)。
该研究没有提供证据表明药剂师减药干预对降低抗胆碱能负担有影响。然而,本事后分析检查了新冠肺炎对干预效果的影响,因此在这一领域进一步研究可能是必要的。