Suppr超能文献

低收入老年群体对抗胆碱能药物相关虚弱的易感性。

Low-Income Older Adults' Vulnerability to Anticholinergic Medication-Associated Frailty.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1100 E Leigh St., Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.

Geriatric Pharmacotherapy Program, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, 410 N 12th St., Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.

出版信息

Drugs Aging. 2023 Dec;40(12):1123-1131. doi: 10.1007/s40266-023-01069-7. Epub 2023 Oct 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A growing body of research supports the negative impact of anticholinergic drug burden on physical frailty. However, prior research has been limited to homogeneous white European populations, and few studies have evaluated how anticholinergic burden tools compare in their measurement function and reliability with minority community-dwelling adult populations. This study investigated the association between anticholinergic drug exposure and frailty by conducting a sensitivity analysis using multiple anticholinergic burden tools in a diverse cohort.

METHODS

A comprehensive psychometric approach was used to assess the performance of five clinical Anticholinergic Burden Tools: Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale (ACB), Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS), average daily dose, total standardized daily doses (TSDD), and Cumulative Anticholinergic Burden scale (CAB). Spearman correlation matrix and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to determine the association among the variables. Ordinal logistic regression is used to evaluate the anticholinergic burden measured by each scale to determine the prediction of frailty. Model performance is determined by the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The cohort included 80 individuals (mean age 69 years; 55.7% female, 71% African American). All anticholinergic burden tools were highly correlated (p < 0.001), ICC3 0.66 (p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.73). Among individuals prescribed anticholinergics, 33% were robust, 44% were prefrail, and 23% were frail. All five tools predicted prefrail and frail status (p < 0.05) with low model misclassification rates for frail individuals (AUC range 0.78-0.85).

CONCLUSION

Anticholinergic burden tools evaluated in this cohort of low-income African American older adults were highly correlated and predicted prefrail and frail status. Findings indicate that clinicians can select the appropriate instrument for the clinic setting and research question while maintaining confidence that all five tools will produce reliable results. Future anticholinergic research is needed to unravel the association between interventions such as deprescribing on incident frailty in longitudinal data.

摘要

背景

越来越多的研究支持抗胆碱能药物负担对身体虚弱的负面影响。然而,先前的研究仅限于同质的白种欧洲人群,很少有研究评估抗胆碱能负担工具在其测量功能和可靠性方面如何与少数民族社区居住的成年人群进行比较。本研究通过在一个多样化的队列中使用多种抗胆碱能负担工具进行敏感性分析,研究了抗胆碱能药物暴露与虚弱之间的关系。

方法

采用综合心理计量学方法评估了五种临床抗胆碱能负担工具的性能:抗胆碱能认知负担量表(ACB)、抗胆碱能药物量表(ADS)、平均日剂量、总标准化日剂量(TSDD)和累积抗胆碱能负担量表(CAB)。Spearman 相关矩阵和组内相关系数(ICC)用于确定变量之间的相关性。有序逻辑回归用于评估每个量表测量的抗胆碱能负担对虚弱的预测作用。模型性能由曲线下面积(AUC)确定。

结果

该队列包括 80 名个体(平均年龄 69 岁;55.7%为女性,71%为非裔美国人)。所有抗胆碱能负担工具相关性均较高(p<0.001),ICC3为 0.66(p<0.001,95%置信区间[CI]为 0.53-0.73)。在服用抗胆碱能药物的个体中,33%为健壮,44%为虚弱前期,23%为虚弱。五种工具均预测虚弱前期和虚弱状态(p<0.05),且对虚弱个体的模型误分类率较低(AUC 范围为 0.78-0.85)。

结论

在本队列中,低收入非裔美国老年人的抗胆碱能负担工具评估高度相关,可预测虚弱前期和虚弱状态。研究结果表明,临床医生可以根据诊所环境和研究问题选择合适的工具,同时保持对所有五种工具都能产生可靠结果的信心。需要进一步开展抗胆碱能药物研究,以揭示在纵向数据中,如停药干预与虚弱发生之间的关联。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验