• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开展运营合作对于成功实施研究产品至关重要:一项退伍军人医疗保健系统相关获取项目的偶然分析。

Engaging Operational Partners Is Critical for Successful Implementation of Research Products: a Coincidence Analysis of Access-Related Projects in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.

机构信息

Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jul;38(Suppl 3):923-930. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08115-5. Epub 2023 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-023-08115-5
PMID:37340262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10356702/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has prioritized timely access to care and has invested substantially in research aimed at optimizing veteran access. However, implementing research into practice remains challenging. Here, we assessed the implementation status of recent VHA access-related research projects and explored factors associated with successful implementation.

DESIGN

We conducted a portfolio review of recent VHA-funded or supported projects (1/2015-7/2020) focused on healthcare access ("Access Portfolio"). We then identified projects with implementable research deliverables by excluding those that (1) were non-research/operational projects; (2) were only recently completed (i.e., completed on or after 1/1/2020, meaning that they were unlikely to have had time to be implemented); and (3) did not propose an implementable deliverable. An electronic survey assessed each project's implementation status and elicited barriers/facilitators to implementing deliverables. Results were analyzed using novel Coincidence Analysis (CNA) methods.

PARTICIPANTS/KEY RESULTS: Among 286 Access Portfolio projects, 36 projects led by 32 investigators across 20 VHA facilities were included. Twenty-nine respondents completed the survey for 32 projects (response rate = 88.9%). Twenty-eight percent of projects reported fully implementing project deliverables, 34% reported partially implementing deliverables, and 37% reported not implementing any deliverables (i.e., resulting tool/intervention not implemented into practice). Of 14 possible barriers/facilitators assessed in the survey, two were identified through CNA as "difference-makers" to partial or full implementation of project deliverables: (1) engagement with national VHA operational leadership; (2) support and commitment from local site operational leadership.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings empirically highlight the importance of operational leadership engagement for successful implementation of research deliverables. Efforts to strengthen communication and engagement between the research community and VHA local/national operational leaders should be expanded to ensure VHA's investment in research leads to meaningful improvements in veterans' care. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has prioritized timely access to care and has invested substantially in research aimed at optimizing veteran access. However, implementing research findings into clinical practice remains challenging, both within and outside VHA. Here, we assessed the implementation status of recent VHA access-related research projects and explored factors associated with successful implementation. Only two factors were identified as "difference-makers" to adoption of project findings into practice: (1) engagement with national VHA leadership or (2) support and commitment from local site leadership. These findings highlight the importance of leadership engagement for successful implementation of research findings. Efforts to strengthen communication and engagement between the research community and VHA local/national leaders should be expanded to ensure VHA's investment in research leads to meaningful improvements in veterans' care.

摘要

背景/目的:退伍军人事务部(VHA)优先考虑及时获得医疗服务,并投入大量资金进行研究,旨在优化退伍军人的就医机会。然而,将研究成果付诸实践仍然具有挑战性。在这里,我们评估了最近与 VHA 获得医疗服务相关的研究项目的实施情况,并探讨了与成功实施相关的因素。

方法

我们对最近的 VHA 资助或支持的项目(2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 7 月)进行了投资组合审查,这些项目侧重于医疗服务的可及性(“可及性投资组合”)。然后,我们通过排除以下项目来确定具有可实施研究成果的项目:(1)非研究/运营项目;(2)最近才完成(即,在 2020 年 1 月 1 日或之后完成,这意味着它们不太可能有时间实施);(3)未提出可实施的成果。一项电子调查评估了每个项目的实施情况,并征集了实施成果的障碍/促进因素。使用新颖的一致性分析(CNA)方法对结果进行了分析。

参与者/主要结果:在 286 个可及性投资组合项目中,有 286 个项目由 20 个 VHA 设施的 32 名研究人员牵头,共纳入 36 个项目。29 名调查对象完成了 32 个项目的调查(应答率为 88.9%)。28%的项目报告已完全实施项目成果,34%的项目报告部分实施了成果,37%的项目报告未实施任何成果(即,未将相关工具/干预措施实施到实践中)。在调查中评估的 14 个可能的障碍/促进因素中,有两个通过 CNA 被确定为“促成因素”,可促进项目成果的部分或全部实施:(1)与国家 VHA 运营领导层的互动;(2)来自当地站点运营领导层的支持和承诺。

结论

这些发现从实证角度强调了运营领导层参与对于成功实施研究成果的重要性。应扩大努力,加强研究界与 VHA 当地/国家运营领导层之间的沟通和参与,以确保 VHA 在研究方面的投资能够为退伍军人的护理带来有意义的改善。退伍军人事务部(VHA)优先考虑及时获得医疗服务,并投入大量资金进行研究,旨在优化退伍军人的就医机会。然而,将研究发现转化为临床实践仍然具有挑战性,无论是在 VHA 内部还是外部。在这里,我们评估了最近与 VHA 获得医疗服务相关的研究项目的实施情况,并探讨了与成功实施相关的因素。只有两个因素被确定为“促成因素”,可以将项目发现纳入实践:(1)与国家 VHA 领导层的互动或(2)来自当地站点领导层的支持和承诺。这些发现强调了领导层参与对于成功实施研究发现的重要性。应扩大努力,加强研究界与 VHA 当地/国家领导层之间的沟通和参与,以确保 VHA 在研究方面的投资能够为退伍军人的护理带来有意义的改善。

相似文献

1
Engaging Operational Partners Is Critical for Successful Implementation of Research Products: a Coincidence Analysis of Access-Related Projects in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.开展运营合作对于成功实施研究产品至关重要:一项退伍军人医疗保健系统相关获取项目的偶然分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jul;38(Suppl 3):923-930. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08115-5. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
2
Competing Demands: Scheduling Challenges in Being Veteran-centric in the Setting of Health System Initiatives to Improve Access.竞争需求:在改善医疗服务获取的卫生系统计划中以退伍军人为中心所面临的调度挑战。
Mil Med. 2021 Nov 2;186(11-12):e1233-e1240. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa520.
3
VA Outreach Is an Essential Area for Improving Veterans' Health Care Accessibility.退伍军人事务部的外展服务是提高退伍军人医疗保健可及性的重要领域。
Mil Med. 2023 Jul 22;188(7-8):e2439-e2447. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad019.
4
User Testing of the Veteran Delegation Tool: Qualitative Inquiry.退伍军人授权工具的用户测试:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 23;25:e40634. doi: 10.2196/40634.
5
6
Evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration's Digital Divide Consult for Tablet Distribution and Telehealth Adoption: Cohort Study.评估退伍军人健康管理局的数字鸿沟咨询服务,以推广平板电脑分发和远程医疗采用:队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 9;26:e59089. doi: 10.2196/59089.
7
8
The Focus They Deserve: Improving Women Veterans' Health Care Access.应得的关注:改善女性退伍军人的医疗保健服务获取。
Womens Health Issues. 2021 Jul-Aug;31(4):399-407. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2020.12.011. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
9
Perspectives of VA healthcare from rural women veterans not enrolled in or using VA healthcare.农村女性退伍军人对退伍军人医疗保健的看法,这些退伍军人没有登记或使用退伍军人医疗保健。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 14;18(8):e0289885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289885. eCollection 2023.
10
Engaging Stakeholders in Identifying Access Research Priorities for the Department of Veterans Affairs.让利益相关者参与确定退伍军人事务部的获取研究优先事项。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Apr;37(Suppl 1):14-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07195-5. Epub 2022 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) User Guide: a five-step guide for conducting implementation research using the framework.《实施研究综合框架(CFIR)用户指南:使用该框架进行实施研究的五步指南》
Implement Sci. 2025 Aug 16;20(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01450-7.
2
The difference-making role of staff support in implementing nurse care management for opioid use disorder treatment: A configurational analysis.员工支持在实施阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的护士护理管理中的差异作用:构型分析
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 May;172:209642. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2025.209642. Epub 2025 Feb 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Leveraging the ExpandNet framework and operational partnerships to scale-up brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in VA primary care clinics.利用ExpandNet框架和业务合作伙伴关系,在退伍军人事务部初级保健诊所扩大短期认知行为疗法的规模。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Jul 20;6(1):e95. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.430. eCollection 2022.
2
Evaluation of organizational capacity in the implementation of a church-based cancer education program.基于教会的癌症教育项目实施中的组织能力评估。
Glob Implement Res Appl. 2022 Mar;2(1):22-33. doi: 10.1007/s43477-021-00033-0. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
3
Engaging Stakeholders in Identifying Access Research Priorities for the Department of Veterans Affairs.让利益相关者参与确定退伍军人事务部的获取研究优先事项。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Apr;37(Suppl 1):14-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07195-5. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
4
Conceptualizing outcomes for use with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): the CFIR Outcomes Addendum.概念化与实施研究整合框架(CFIR)一起使用的结果:CFIR 结果附录。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jan 22;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01181-5.
5
Sustaining effective research/operational collaborations: Lessons learned from a National Partnered Evaluation Initiative.维持有效的研究/运营合作:国家合作评估计划的经验教训。
Healthc (Amst). 2021 Dec;9(4):100588. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100588. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
6
Facility-level conditions leading to higher reach: a configurational analysis of national VA weight management programming.导致更高达成率的机构层面条件:国家退伍军人事务部体重管理规划的组态分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 11;21(1):797. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06774-w.
7
Coincidence analysis: a new method for causal inference in implementation science.吻合分析:实施科学中因果推断的一种新方法。
Implement Sci. 2020 Dec 11;15(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01070-3.
8
Factors Influencing Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Improvement Program in Community Health Centers: an Applied Use of Configurational Comparative Methods.影响社区卫生中心结直肠癌筛查改善计划实施的因素:组态比较方法的应用。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):815-822. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06186-2. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
9
Strategy Configurations Directly Linked to Higher Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Starts: An Applied Use of Configurational Comparative Methods.策略配置与更高的丙型肝炎病毒治疗启动直接相关:配置比较方法的应用。
Med Care. 2020 May;58(5):e31-e38. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001319.
10
Comparison of Wait Times for New Patients Between the Private Sector and United States Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.私营部门和美国退伍军人事务医疗中心新患者等待时间比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187096. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7096.