• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外冲击波碎石术是肾绞痛的治疗选择吗?

Is Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy a Treatment Option for Renal Colic?

机构信息

Department of Urology, Jiménez Díaz Foundation Hospital, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Arch Esp Urol. 2023 May;76(3):175-181. doi: 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20237603.20.

DOI:10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20237603.20
PMID:37340522
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Renal colic is characterized by sharp, intense flank pain. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the treatment of choice, although extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is a noninvasive alternative for pain management. The objective of our study is to present results obtained using rapid SWL to treat renal colic in our center.

METHODS

We analyzed 214 patients undergoing rapid shockwave extracorporeal lithotripsy between October 2014 and June 2018: 69.63% were male, and 30.37% female, with a mean age of 47.35 years (range, 16-84). The average stone size was 6.71 mm (3-16). Stone locations were as follows: The pelviureteric junction (PUJ) (10.75%), proximal ureter (45.79%), midureter (24.77%), and distal ureter (18.69%).

RESULTS

Pain relief was achieved in 81.31% of the patients. The rates of successful pain control according to stone location were 65.22% when the stone was located in the PUJ, 79.59% in the proximal ureter, 88.68% in the midureter, and 85.00% in the distal ureter. Complete or partial stone resolution was achieved 4 weeks postoperatively in 78.50% of cases (64.95% and 13.55%, respectively). According to the stone location, the overall rate of resolution (complete + partial) was 90.00% for distal ureteral stones, 86.80% in the midureter, 73.47% in the proximal ureter, and 60.86% in the PUJ. 44 patients (20.56%) demonstrated complications. The most common complications were persistent pain, acute renal failure and fever.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate SWL was found to be a safe and effective treatment option for pain related to renal colic in 81% of the patients studied.

摘要

背景

肾绞痛的特点是剧烈的、剧烈的侧腹痛。非甾体抗炎药是治疗的首选,尽管体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)是一种非侵入性的疼痛管理替代方法。我们研究的目的是介绍在我们中心使用快速 SWL 治疗肾绞痛所获得的结果。

方法

我们分析了 2014 年 10 月至 2018 年 6 月期间接受快速冲击波体外碎石术的 214 例患者:69.63%为男性,30.37%为女性,平均年龄为 47.35 岁(范围 16-84 岁)。结石平均大小为 6.71mm(3-16mm)。结石位置如下:肾盂输尿管连接部(PUJ)(10.75%)、输尿管上段(45.79%)、输尿管中段(24.77%)和输尿管下段(18.69%)。

结果

81.31%的患者疼痛缓解。根据结石位置,结石位于肾盂输尿管连接部时,疼痛控制成功率为 65.22%,输尿管上段为 79.59%,输尿管中段为 88.68%,输尿管下段为 85.00%。78.50%的病例在术后 4 周时完全或部分解决结石(分别为 64.95%和 13.55%)。根据结石位置,完全或部分分辨率的总体发生率为:远端输尿管结石 90.00%,输尿管中段 86.80%,输尿管上段 73.47%,肾盂输尿管连接部 60.86%。44 例(20.56%)患者出现并发症。最常见的并发症是持续性疼痛、急性肾衰竭和发热。

结论

即时 SWL 被发现是一种安全有效的治疗选择,可缓解 81%的研究患者的肾绞痛相关疼痛。

相似文献

1
Is Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy a Treatment Option for Renal Colic?体外冲击波碎石术是肾绞痛的治疗选择吗?
Arch Esp Urol. 2023 May;76(3):175-181. doi: 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20237603.20.
2
Predictors of successful emergency shock wave lithotripsy for acute renal colic.预测急性肾绞痛急诊冲击波碎石术成功的因素。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Aug;50(4):481-485. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01332-3. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
3
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment for urinary tract stones in children: outcome of 500 cases.体外冲击波碎石术作为儿童尿路结石的一线治疗方法:500 例病例的结果。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Jun;44(3):661-6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-012-0133-0. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
4
Emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A study on feasibility and efficacy in stone clearance and reducing morbidity in ureteric and renal stones with colic.急诊体外冲击波碎石术:研究其在缓解输尿管和肾结石绞痛方面的结石清除率和降低发病率的可行性和疗效。
Urologia. 2023 Aug;90(3):516-521. doi: 10.1177/03915603221140444. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
5
Emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for acute renal colic caused by upper urinary-tract stones.上尿路结石所致急性肾绞痛的急诊体外冲击波碎石术
J Endourol. 2005 Jan-Feb;19(1):1-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.1.
6
Emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy as opposed to delayed shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of acute renal colic due to obstructive ureteral stone: a prospective randomized trial.与延迟冲击波碎石术相比,急诊体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管梗阻性结石所致急性肾绞痛的前瞻性随机试验。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2018 Oct;70(5):526-533. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03084-9. Epub 2018 May 14.
7
Ureteral stones: SWL treatment.输尿管结石:体外冲击波碎石术治疗
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2011 Mar;83(1):10-3.
8
Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术与钬激光联合半硬性输尿管肾镜治疗近端输尿管大结石的比较。
J Urol. 2004 Nov;172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000142848.43880.b3.
9
Impact of colic pain as a significant factor for predicting the stone free rate of one-session shock wave lithotripsy for treating ureter stones: a Bayesian logistic regression model analysis.绞痛疼痛作为预测输尿管结石单次冲击波碎石术结石清除率的重要因素的影响:贝叶斯逻辑回归模型分析
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 22;10(4):e0123800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123800. eCollection 2015.
10
Emergency ureteroscopic lithotripsy in acute renal colic caused by ureteral calculi: a retrospective study.输尿管结石所致急性肾绞痛的急诊输尿管镜碎石术:一项回顾性研究
Urol Res. 2011 Dec;39(6):497-501. doi: 10.1007/s00240-011-0381-y. Epub 2011 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of music therapy for pain control of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.音乐疗法对体外冲击波碎石术疼痛控制效果的Meta 分析:随机对照研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 31;103(22):e38182. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038182.