Aloizou Athina-Maria, Palaiodimou Lina, Aloizou Dimitra, Dardiotis Efthimios, Gold Ralf, Tsivgoulis Georgios, Krogias Christos
Department of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791 Bochum, Germany.
Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, 41100 Larissa, Greece.
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2023 Jun 16;16:17562864231180717. doi: 10.1177/17562864231180717. eCollection 2023.
Cancer-related stroke (CRS), referring to ischemic stroke occurring in cancer patients without other clear etiology, represents a clinical challenge, as it is associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes including high rates of recurrence and mortality. There are scarce international recommendations and limited consensus statements on CRS management. For this comprehensive overview, the available studies/reviews/meta-analyses on the use of acute reperfusion and secondary prevention treatments for cancer patients with ischemic stroke, focusing on antithrombotic agents, were collected and summarized. A practical management algorithm was designed per the available data. In short, acute reperfusion in the form of intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy appears to be safe in CRS and can be considered for eligible patients, though the functional outcomes are often poor, and mostly defined by the preexisting condition. Many patients carry indications for anticoagulation, in which case vitamin K antagonists are not preferred, while low-molecular weight heparins remain the treatment of choice; direct oral anticoagulants can be alternatively considered but are contraindicated for gastrointestinal malignancies. For patients without clear anticoagulation indications, no net benefit for anticoagulation compared to aspirin has been shown. Other targeted treatment options should be evaluated in an individualized approach, alongside the appropriate management of conventional cerebrovascular risk factors. Oncological treatment should be swiftly initiated/continued. In conclusion, acute CRS remains a clinical challenge, with many patients suffering recurrent stroke, despite preventive measures. More randomized-controlled clinical trials are urgently needed to pinpoint the most effective management options for this subset of stroke patients.
癌症相关卒中(CRS)是指在无其他明确病因的癌症患者中发生的缺血性卒中,它是一项临床挑战,因为其与包括高复发率和死亡率在内的不良临床结局相关。关于CRS的管理,国际上的推荐意见很少,共识声明也有限。为了进行这一全面综述,我们收集并总结了关于癌症缺血性卒中患者使用急性再灌注和二级预防治疗(重点是抗血栓药物)的现有研究、综述和荟萃分析。根据现有数据设计了一个实用的管理算法。简而言之,静脉溶栓和机械取栓形式的急性再灌注在CRS中似乎是安全的,对于符合条件的患者可以考虑使用,尽管功能结局往往较差,且大多由既往病情决定。许多患者有抗凝指征,在这种情况下不首选维生素K拮抗剂,而低分子量肝素仍是治疗的选择;也可考虑直接口服抗凝剂,但对胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者禁用。对于无明确抗凝指征的患者,与阿司匹林相比,抗凝并未显示出净获益。其他靶向治疗选择应采用个体化方法进行评估,同时对传统脑血管危险因素进行适当管理。肿瘤治疗应迅速启动/继续。总之,急性CRS仍然是一项临床挑战,尽管采取了预防措施,仍有许多患者发生复发性卒中。迫切需要更多的随机对照临床试验来确定这类卒中患者最有效的管理方案。