Suntharasamai P, Chanthavanich P, Warrell M J, Looareesuwan S, Karbwang J, Supanaranond W, Phillips R E, Jansawan W, Xueref C, Pouradier-Duteil X
J Hyg (Lond). 1986 Jun;96(3):483-9. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400066286.
Neutralizing antibody responses to conventional rabies post-exposure regimens of human diploid cell strain vaccine (HDCSV) and the new purified Vero cell rabies vaccine (PVRV) were compared in 58 healthy Thai veterinary students. The geometric mean titres (GMTs) of the group given HDCSV were slightly higher than those given PVRV, but on day 28 the peak GMTs of the two groups were statistically similar. The early antibody response to PVRV was unaffected by the addition of passive immunization, whereas the level of HDCSV response was reduced on day 14, so that there was no difference on that day between the GMTs of the two vaccine groups given HRIG. However, by day 91 the GMT of those given PVRV and HRIG was lower than in those given HDCSV alone or with HRIG. The appearance of antibody was less rapid than was observed in previous studies using multiple-site intradermal vaccination. Side effects were trivial. Our results confirm the promise of this new, potentially more economical tissue culture vaccine, but they suggest that the regimen could be improved.
在58名健康的泰国兽医专业学生中,比较了他们对人二倍体细胞狂犬病疫苗(HDCSV)的传统暴露后免疫方案和新型纯化Vero细胞狂犬病疫苗(PVRV)的中和抗体反应。接受HDCSV的组的几何平均滴度(GMT)略高于接受PVRV的组,但在第28天,两组的最高GMT在统计学上相似。对PVRV的早期抗体反应不受被动免疫添加的影响,而HDCSV反应水平在第14天降低,因此在该天接受人狂犬病免疫球蛋白(HRIG)的两个疫苗组的GMT没有差异。然而,到第91天,接受PVRV和HRIG的人的GMT低于单独接受HDCSV或接受HDCSV加HRIG的人。抗体出现的速度比之前使用多点皮内接种疫苗的研究中观察到的要慢。副作用轻微。我们的结果证实了这种新的、可能更经济的组织培养疫苗的前景,但也表明该方案可以改进。