• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Effectiveness of mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma: In a real life study].[美泊利珠单抗治疗重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者的有效性:一项真实世界研究]
Tuberk Toraks. 2023 Jun;71(2):148-155. doi: 10.5578/tt.20239918.
2
Evaluation of the Clinical Features and Laboratory Data of Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Classified as Super-Responders, Partial Responders, or Nonresponders to Mepolizumab Treatment: A Real-Life Study.评估接受美泊利珠单抗治疗的重症嗜酸粒细胞性哮喘患者中超级应答者、部分应答者和无应答者的临床特征和实验室数据:一项真实世界研究。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2023;184(8):736-743. doi: 10.1159/000529760. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
3
Effectiveness of Mepolizumab in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma with/without Nasal Polyposis: A Real-Life Study.美泊利珠单抗治疗伴有/不伴有鼻息肉的重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者的有效性:一项真实世界研究。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2024;185(3):253-259. doi: 10.1159/000534902. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
4
Mepolizumab in children and adolescents with severe eosinophilic asthma not eligible for omalizumab: a single Center experience.美泊利单抗治疗不适合奥马珠单抗的重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘儿童和青少年:单中心经验
J Asthma. 2024 Aug;61(8):793-800. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2024.2303767. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
5
Mepolizumab Is an Effective Option in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Regardless of Baseline Features: Single-Center Real-Life Data.美泊利珠单抗是严重嗜酸性哮喘的有效治疗选择,与基线特征无关:单中心真实世界数据。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2022;183(5):526-538. doi: 10.1159/000520725. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
6
Mepolizumab improves sino-nasal symptoms and asthma control in severe eosinophilic asthma patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps: a 12-month real-life study.美泊利珠单抗改善伴有鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎和重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者的鼻窦-鼻部症状和哮喘控制:一项为期 12 个月的真实世界研究。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2021 Jan-Dec;15:17534666211009398. doi: 10.1177/17534666211009398.
7
Switching from omalizumab to mepolizumab: real-life experience from Southern Italy.从奥马珠单抗转换为美泊利珠单抗:来自意大利南部的真实临床经验。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2020 Jan-Dec;14:1753466620929231. doi: 10.1177/1753466620929231.
8
Comparison of omalizumab and mepolizumab treatment efficacy in patients with atopic and eosinophilic "Overlap" severe asthma: Biological agent preference in atopic-eosinophilic severe asthma.奥马珠单抗与美泊利珠单抗治疗特应性和嗜酸性粒细胞“重叠”重症哮喘患者的疗效比较:特应性嗜酸性粒细胞重症哮喘中的生物制剂选择。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 May 5;102(18):e33660. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033660.
9
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Mepolizumab Effectiveness in a Real-Life Setting.美泊利珠单抗在真实临床环境中的有效性综合评估。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2020;181(8):606-612. doi: 10.1159/000507996. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
10
Benefit of switching to mepolizumab from omalizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma based on patient characteristics.根据患者特征,重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘换用美泊利珠单抗相比于奥马珠单抗的获益。
Respir Res. 2021 May 10;22(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01733-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the Clinical Features and Laboratory Data of Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Classified as Super-Responders, Partial Responders, or Nonresponders to Mepolizumab Treatment: A Real-Life Study.评估接受美泊利珠单抗治疗的重症嗜酸粒细胞性哮喘患者中超级应答者、部分应答者和无应答者的临床特征和实验室数据:一项真实世界研究。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2023;184(8):736-743. doi: 10.1159/000529760. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
2
Mepolizumab Is an Effective Option in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Regardless of Baseline Features: Single-Center Real-Life Data.美泊利珠单抗是严重嗜酸性哮喘的有效治疗选择,与基线特征无关:单中心真实世界数据。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2022;183(5):526-538. doi: 10.1159/000520725. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
3
Global Initiative for Asthma Strategy 2021: executive summary and rationale for key changes.全球哮喘倡议 2021 战略:执行摘要和关键变更的理由。
Eur Respir J. 2021 Dec 31;59(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02730-2021. Print 2022 Jan.
4
Response to Mepolizumab Treatment in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma and Atopic Phenotypes.重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘和特应性表型患者对美泊利单抗治疗的反应
J Asthma Allergy. 2021 Jun 14;14:675-683. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S298559. eCollection 2021.
5
Real-world Effectiveness of Mepolizumab in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.真实世界中美泊利珠单抗治疗重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Ther. 2021 Jun;43(6):e192-e208. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.03.023. Epub 2021 May 4.
6
Effectiveness of mepolizumab therapy on symptoms, asthma exacerbations, steroid dependence, and small airways in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.美泊利珠单抗治疗重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者的症状、哮喘恶化、激素依赖和小气道的疗效。
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Aug 30;51(4):1953-1959. doi: 10.3906/sag-2009-41.
7
Mepolizumab Effectiveness and Allergic Status in Real Life.美泊利珠单抗在真实世界中的疗效和过敏状态。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2021;182(4):311-318. doi: 10.1159/000511147. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
8
Long-Term Therapy Response to Anti-IL-5 Biologics in Severe Asthma-A Real-Life Evaluation.抗白细胞介素-5 生物制剂治疗重度哮喘的长期疗效:真实世界评估。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Mar;9(3):1194-1200. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
9
Real-World Effectiveness and the Characteristics of a "Super-Responder" to Mepolizumab in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma.真实世界疗效及对美泊利珠单抗治疗重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的“超级应答者”特征
Chest. 2020 Aug;158(2):491-500. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.042. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
10
Efficacy and safety of treatment with biologicals (benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab) for severe eosinophilic asthma. A systematic review for the EAACI Guidelines - recommendations on the use of biologicals in severe asthma.生物制剂(贝那利珠单抗、度普利尤单抗、美泊利单抗、奥马珠单抗和瑞利珠单抗)治疗重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的疗效和安全性。EAACI指南的系统评价——关于生物制剂在重度哮喘中应用的建议
Allergy. 2020 May;75(5):1023-1042. doi: 10.1111/all.14221. Epub 2020 Feb 24.

[美泊利珠单抗治疗重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者的有效性:一项真实世界研究]

[Effectiveness of mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma: In a real life study].

作者信息

Bulut İsmet, Yegin Katran Zeynep, Yavuz Dilek, Yıldız Ali Burkan, Yakut Tuğçe, Örçen Cihan, Mersin Selver Seda

机构信息

Clinic of Allergy Immunology, Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases-Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences İstanbul, Türkiye.

Clinic of Allergy Immunology, Diyarbakır Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, Türkiye.

出版信息

Tuberk Toraks. 2023 Jun;71(2):148-155. doi: 10.5578/tt.20239918.

DOI:10.5578/tt.20239918
PMID:37345397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10795248/
Abstract

ABSTRACT

Effectiveness of mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma: In a real life study

INTRODUCTION

We analyzed the effects of mepolizumab treatment on symptoms, asthma attacks, pulmonary function test parameters peripheral blood eosinophil level, and percentage in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma receiving mepolizumab treatment as the baseline, sixth and twelfthmonth data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of patients diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma and treated with mepolizumab at our clinic were retrospectively reviewed for the period between January 2018 and December 2021. Demographic data of the patients, duration of asthma disease, comorbidities such as a nasal polyp, eosinophilic granulomatous polyangiitis, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug exacerbated respiratory disease were investigated. A comparison was made of various factors before initiating mepolizumab treatment, as well as at the sixth and twelfth month after treatment initiation. These factors include asthma control test scores, frequency of asthma attacks (including emergency admissions, hospitalizations, and intensive care admissions), peripheral blood eosinophil levels and percentages, and pulmonary function test parameters. Clinic and laboratory parameters that provide a prediction of being a responder and super responder were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients were included in the study. Their mean age was 50.7 ± 11.9 years, and four (19%) were males. The mean duration of asthma diagnosis was 17.5 ±13.7 years. 14 patients (66.7%) were atopic. 4 patients (19%) had nasal polyps and four patients (19%) had NERD. Before mepolizumab, 13 (61.9%) patients had received omalizumab. The duration of receiving mepolizumab treatment was 29.2 ± 9.9 months. A statistically significant dec rease was observed in both the number and percentage of eosinophils at months six and 12 (p< 0.01). There was a statistically significant increase in FEV values both as a percentage and in milliliters at month 12. There was an increase in both percentage and milliliters in FEF values, but this increase did not reach statistical significance. There was a decrease in service admissions, intensive care admissions, and emergency admissions due to asthma exacerbations. Out of 21 patients, 11 (52.4%) were classified as responders, while 10 (47.6%) were classified as super responders.

CONCLUSION

Although the number of patients in our study was limited, mepolizumab improved symptom scores in severe eosinophilic asthma, reduced the number of attacks, and improved pulmonary function test values.

摘要

摘要

美泊利珠单抗治疗重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者的有效性:一项真实世界研究

引言

我们分析了以美泊利珠单抗治疗重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者时,治疗对症状、哮喘发作、肺功能测试参数、外周血嗜酸性粒细胞水平及百分比的影响,数据以基线、第6个月和第12个月为准。

材料与方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2021年12月期间在我们诊所被诊断为重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘并接受美泊利珠单抗治疗的患者的病历。调查患者的人口统计学数据、哮喘病程、合并症,如鼻息肉、嗜酸性肉芽肿性多血管炎和非甾体抗炎药加重的呼吸道疾病。对开始美泊利珠单抗治疗前以及治疗开始后第6个月和第12个月的各种因素进行比较。这些因素包括哮喘控制测试评分、哮喘发作频率(包括急诊入院、住院和重症监护入院)、外周血嗜酸性粒细胞水平和百分比以及肺功能测试参数。评估了能够预测患者是否为反应者和超级反应者的临床和实验室参数。

结果

共有21例患者纳入研究。他们的平均年龄为50.7±11.9岁,4例(19%)为男性。哮喘诊断的平均病程为17.5±13.7年。14例患者(66.7%)为特应性体质。4例患者(19%)有鼻息肉,4例患者(19%)有NERD。在使用美泊利珠单抗之前,13例(61.9%)患者接受过奥马珠单抗治疗。接受美泊利珠单抗治疗的时长为29.2±9.9个月。在第6个月和第12个月时,嗜酸性粒细胞的数量和百分比均出现了具有统计学意义的下降(p<0.01)。在第12个月时,FEV值无论是以百分比还是以毫升为单位均出现了具有统计学意义的升高。FEF值在百分比和毫升数方面均有所增加,但这种增加未达到统计学意义。因哮喘加重导致的门诊入院、重症监护入院和急诊入院次数均有所减少。在21例患者中,11例(52.4%)被归类为反应者,而10例(47.6%)被归类为超级反应者。

结论

尽管我们研究中的患者数量有限,但美泊利珠单抗改善了重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的症状评分,减少了发作次数,并改善了肺功能测试值。