Perr I N
J Forensic Sci. 1986 Jul;31(3):812-7.
The law does not generally allow alcohol intoxication as a defense in a criminal matter. Among the exceptions may be pathological intoxication, or PI, or its current psychiatric correlate, alcohol idiosyncratic intoxication (AII). Because of the lack of specificity in the medical concept and the varying approaches by different authors, careful analysis and adherence to current standards are necessary. Relevant laws, particularly that of the model penal code, are reviewed, as are three cases which demonstrate the issues involved. Actual testimony is presented to illustrate possible misuse or inappropriate use of the concept.
法律一般不允许在刑事案件中以酒精中毒作为抗辩理由。例外情况可能包括病理性醉酒(PI)或其当前的精神科对应情况,即酒精特异质性中毒(AII)。由于医学概念缺乏特异性以及不同作者的不同方法,需要进行仔细分析并遵循当前标准。本文回顾了相关法律,特别是《模范刑法典》,还分析了三个案例以说明其中涉及的问题。文中给出了实际证词以说明该概念可能被滥用或不当使用的情况。