Armstrong J, Silberg J L, Parenté F J
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1986 Aug;174(8):448-56. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198608000-00002.
One-hundred thirty-eight hospitalized adolescents exhibiting a broad range of psychopathology were divided into four groups based on the presence or absence of significant thought disorder on the Wechsler IQ (using Johnston and Holzman's Thought Disorder Index) and the Rorschach (using Exner's Schizophrenia Index). All subjects in the four IQ/Rorschach cross-classified groups (group A, low disordered IQ/low disordered Rorschach; group B, low disordered IQ/high disordered Rorschach; group C, high disordered IQ/high disordered Rorschach; group D, high disordered IQ/low disordered Rorschach) were rated as well on clinical symptomatology (using the Psychiatric Evaluation Form, a scale developed by Spitzer and Endicott). A multivariate analysis of variance comparing the means of the Psychiatric Evaluation Form variables for the four groups yielded significant interactions and significant main effects. The results portrayed a symptomatic picture of depression and acting out in group A, borderline-like traits in group B, psychosis in group C, and interpersonal difficulty in group D. These results are interpreted as support for the value of comparative measures of thought disorder in clinical evaluation. Further research to investigate the heretofore undescribed group D is recommended.
138名患有广泛精神病理学问题的住院青少年,根据韦氏智力量表(使用约翰斯顿和霍尔兹曼的思维紊乱指数)和罗夏墨迹测验(使用埃克斯纳的精神分裂症指数)中是否存在显著思维紊乱,被分为四组。四个智商/罗夏墨迹测验交叉分类组(A组,低思维紊乱智商/低思维紊乱罗夏墨迹测验;B组,低思维紊乱智商/高思维紊乱罗夏墨迹测验;C组,高思维紊乱智商/高思维紊乱罗夏墨迹测验;D组,高思维紊乱智商/低思维紊乱罗夏墨迹测验)中的所有受试者,也根据临床症状进行了评分(使用精神科评估表,这是斯皮策和恩迪科特编制的一个量表)。对四组精神科评估表变量的均值进行的多变量方差分析产生了显著的交互作用和显著的主效应。结果描绘出A组有抑郁和行为表现问题的症状图景,B组有边缘性人格特质,C组有精神病,D组有人际交往困难。这些结果被解释为支持思维紊乱比较测量在临床评估中的价值。建议进一步研究此前未描述的D组。