Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
J Neurol Sci. 2023 Aug 15;451:120711. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2023.120711. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
To identify whether language impairment exists presymptomatically in genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and if so, the key differences between the main genetic mutation groups.
682 participants from the international multicentre Genetic FTD Initiative (GENFI) study were recruited: 290 asymptomatic and 82 prodromal mutation carriers (with C9orf72, GRN, and MAPT mutations) as well as 310 mutation-negative controls. Language was assessed using items from the Progressive Aphasia Severity Scale, as well as the Boston Naming Test (BNT), modified Camel and Cactus Test (mCCT) and a category fluency task. Participants also underwent a 3 T volumetric T1-weighted MRI from which regional brain volumes within the language network were derived and compared between the groups.
3% of asymptomatic (4% C9orf72, 4% GRN, 2% MAPT) and 48% of prodromal (46% C9orf72, 42% GRN, 64% MAPT) mutation carriers had impairment in at least one language symptom compared with 13% of controls. In prodromal mutation carriers significantly impaired word retrieval was seen in all three genetic groups whilst significantly impaired grammar/syntax and decreased fluency was seen only in C9orf72 and GRN mutation carriers, and impaired articulation only in the C9orf72 group. Prodromal MAPT mutation carriers had significant impairment on the category fluency task and the BNT whilst prodromal C9orf72 mutation carriers were impaired on the category fluency task only. Atrophy in the dominant perisylvian language regions differed between groups, with earlier, more widespread volume loss in C9orf72, and later focal atrophy in the temporal lobe in MAPT mutation carriers.
Language deficits exist in the prodromal but not asymptomatic stages of genetic FTD across all three genetic groups. Improved understanding of the language phenotype prior to phenoconversion to fully symptomatic FTD will help develop outcome measures for future presymptomatic trials.
确定遗传性额颞叶痴呆(FTD)是否存在症状前的语言障碍,如果存在,主要基因突变组之间的关键差异是什么。
我们招募了来自国际多中心遗传 FTD 倡议(GENFI)研究的 682 名参与者:290 名无症状和 82 名前驱期突变携带者(携带 C9orf72、GRN 和 MAPT 突变)以及 310 名突变阴性对照者。使用渐进性失语严重程度量表(Progressive Aphasia Severity Scale)、波士顿命名测验(Boston Naming Test,BNT)、改良的 Camel 和 Cactus 测验(modified Camel and Cactus Test,mCCT)和类别流畅性任务来评估语言。参与者还接受了 3T 容积 T1 加权 MRI,从中得出语言网络内的区域脑容量,并在各组之间进行比较。
与对照组的 13%相比,3%的无症状(4%的 C9orf72、4%的 GRN、2%的 MAPT)和 48%的前驱期突变携带者(46%的 C9orf72、42%的 GRN、64%的 MAPT)至少有一项语言症状受损。在前驱期突变携带者中,所有三个基因突变组都出现了明显的单词检索障碍,而只有 C9orf72 和 GRN 突变携带者出现了语法/句法明显障碍和流畅性降低,只有 C9orf72 组出现了发音障碍。前驱期 MAPT 突变携带者在类别流畅性任务和 BNT 中存在显著障碍,而前驱期 C9orf72 突变携带者仅在类别流畅性任务中存在障碍。各组之间优势大脑语言区域的萎缩不同,C9orf72 中体积损失更早、更广泛,而 MAPT 突变携带者中颞叶的局灶性萎缩较晚。
在所有三个基因突变组中,遗传性额颞叶痴呆的前驱期而非无症状期都存在语言障碍。在完全有症状的 FTD 发生表型转化之前,对语言表型的理解有所提高,将有助于为未来的前驱期试验开发结果测量方法。