Hajibonabi Farid, Taye Marta, Ubanwa Angela, Rowe Jean Sebastien, Sharperson Camara, Hanna Tarek N, Johnson Jamlik-Omari
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Emerg Radiol. 2023 Aug;30(4):453-463. doi: 10.1007/s10140-023-02152-7. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
To assess if patients who underwent head computed tomography (CT) experienced disparities in the emergency department (ED) and if the indication for head CT affected disparities.
This study employed a retrospective, IRB-approved cohort design encompassing four hospitals. All ED patients between January 2016 and September 2020 who underwent non-contrast head CTs were included. Furthermore, key time intervals including ED length of stay (LOS), ED assessment time, image acquisition time, and image interpretation time were calculated. Time ratio (TR) was used to compare these time intervals between the groups.
A total of 45,177 ED visits comprising 4730 trauma cases, 5475 altered mental status cases, 11,925 cases with head pain, and 23,047 cases with other indications were included. Females had significantly longer ED LOS, ED assessment time, and image acquisition time (TR = 1.012, 1.051, 1.018, respectively, P-value < 0.05). This disparity was more pronounced in female patients with head pain complaints compared to their male counterparts (TR = 1.036, 1.059, and 1.047, respectively, P-value < 0.05). Black patients experienced significantly longer ED LOS, image acquisition time, and image assessment time (TR = 1.226, 1.349, and 1.190, respectively, P-value < 0.05). These disparities persisted regardless of head CT indications. Furthermore, patients with Medicare/Medicaid insurance also faced longer wait times in all the time intervals (TR > 1, P-value < 0.001).
Wait times for ED head CT completion were longer for Black patients and Medicaid/Medicare insurance holders. Additionally, females experienced extended wait times, particularly when presented with head pain complaints. Our findings underscore the importance of exploring and addressing the contributing factors to ensure equitable and timely access to imaging services in the ED.
评估接受头部计算机断层扫描(CT)的患者在急诊科(ED)是否存在差异,以及头部CT的检查指征是否会影响这种差异。
本研究采用了一项经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的回顾性队列设计,涉及四家医院。纳入了2016年1月至2020年9月期间在急诊科接受非增强头部CT检查的所有患者。此外,还计算了关键时间间隔,包括急诊科住院时间(LOS)、急诊科评估时间、图像采集时间和图像解读时间。使用时间比(TR)来比较各组之间的这些时间间隔。
共纳入了45177次急诊科就诊病例,其中包括4730例创伤病例、5475例精神状态改变病例、11925例头痛病例和23047例其他指征病例。女性患者的急诊科住院时间、急诊科评估时间和图像采集时间显著更长(TR分别为1.012、1.051和1.018,P值<0.05)。与男性患者相比,有头痛主诉的女性患者的这种差异更为明显(TR分别为1.036、1.059和1.047,P值<0.05)。黑人患者的急诊科住院时间、图像采集时间和图像评估时间显著更长(TR分别为1.226、1.349和1.190,P值<0.05)。无论头部CT检查指征如何,这些差异都持续存在。此外,拥有医疗保险/医疗补助保险的患者在所有时间间隔内的等待时间也更长(TR>1,P值<0.001)。
黑人患者以及医疗保险/医疗补助保险持有者完成急诊科头部CT检查的等待时间更长。此外,女性患者的等待时间延长,尤其是在有头痛主诉时。我们的研究结果强调了探索和解决影响因素的重要性,以确保在急诊科能够公平、及时地获得影像检查服务。