Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830011, People's Republic of China.
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2023 Oct;16(5):1177-1183. doi: 10.1007/s12265-023-10402-9. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
We aimed to evaluate the association of the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) with the clinical outcomes of coronary artery disease (CAD). All 14,944 patients with CAD evaluated in the present study were from a prospective cohort that recruited 15,250 patients admitted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University between December 2016 and October 2021. The all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiac mortality (CM) were selected as the primary endpoints. The secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), and non-fatal myocardial infarction (NFMI). The optimal FAR cutoff value was determined by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Using 0.1 as the cutoff value, all the patients were divided into two groups: a low-FAR group (FAR < 0.1, n = 10,076) and a high-FAR group (FAR ≥ 0.1, n = 4918). The incidence of outcomes between the two groups was compared. The high-FAR group exhibited a higher incidence of ACM (5.3% vs. 1.9%), CM (3.9% vs. 1.4%), MACEs (9.8% vs. 6.7%), MACCEs (10.4% vs. 7.6%), and NFMI (2.3% vs. 1.3%) than the low-FAR group. To adjust the confounders, multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that the risk in the high-FAR group was increased 2.182 fold in ACM (HR = 2.182, 95% CI: 1.761 ~ 2.704, P < 0.001), 2.116 fold in CM (HR = 2.116, 95% CI: 1.761 ~ 2.704, P < 0.001), 1.327 fold in MACEs (HR = 1.327, 95% CI: 1.166 ~ 1.510, P < 0.001), 1.280 fold in MACCEs (HR = 1.280, 95% CI: 1.131 ~ 1.448, P < 0.001), and 1.791 fold in NFMI (HR = 1.791, 95% CI:1.331 ~ 2.411, P < 0.001), compared to the low-FAR group. The present study suggested that the high-FAR group was an independent and powerful predictor of adverse outcomes in CAD patients.
我们旨在评估纤维蛋白原与白蛋白比值(FAR)与冠心病(CAD)临床结局的关系。本研究中评估的所有 14944 例 CAD 患者均来自前瞻性队列,该队列纳入了 2016 年 12 月至 2021 年 10 月期间新疆医科大学第一附属医院收治的 15250 例患者。全因死亡率(ACM)和心脏死亡率(CM)被选为主要终点。次要终点是主要不良心血管事件(MACEs)、主要不良心脏和脑血管事件(MACCEs)和非致死性心肌梗死(NFMI)。通过使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定最佳 FAR 截断值。使用 0.1 作为截断值,将所有患者分为两组:低 FAR 组(FAR<0.1,n=10076)和高 FAR 组(FAR≥0.1,n=4918)。比较两组之间结局的发生率。高 FAR 组的 ACM(5.3%比 1.9%)、CM(3.9%比 1.4%)、MACEs(9.8%比 6.7%)、MACCEs(10.4%比 7.6%)和 NFMI(2.3%比 1.3%)发生率均高于低 FAR 组。为了调整混杂因素,多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,高 FAR 组的 ACM(HR=2.182,95%CI:1.7612.704,P<0.001)、CM(HR=2.116,95%CI:1.7612.704,P<0.001)、MACEs(HR=1.327,95%CI:1.1661.510,P<0.001)、MACCEs(HR=1.280,95%CI:1.1311.448,P<0.001)和 NFMI(HR=1.791,95%CI:1.331~2.411,P<0.001)的风险均增加 2.182 倍。本研究表明,高 FAR 组是 CAD 患者不良结局的独立且有力的预测因子。