Lee Dong-Yeong, Kang Dong-Geun, Jo Ho-Seung, Heo Se-Joon, Bae Ji-Ho, Hwang Sun-Chul
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Barun Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University and Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea.
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2023 Jun 22;35(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s43019-023-00189-z.
This study sought to clarify treatment evidence to treat patellar dislocation by evaluating which treatment could yield better improvement of clinical outcomes for acute patellar dislocation in children and adolescents 18 years of age or younger.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials electronic databases were searched for relevant articles comparing clinical outcomes of conservative and surgical treatments for acute patellar dislocation in children and adolescents published from March 2008 to August 2022. Data searching, extraction, analysis, and quality assessment were performed on the basis of the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. The quality assessment of each study was investigated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) critical appraisal scoring system and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale scores. To calculate the overall combined effect size for each outcome, Review Manager Version 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Software Update, Oxford) was employed.
Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one prospective study were investigated. In terms of pain [mean difference (MD) 6.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.73-11.45, I 0%], there were significantly better outcomes in conservative group. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in any evaluated outcomes such as redislocation [risk ratio (RR) 1.36, 95% CI 0.72-2.54, I 65%], Kujala score (MD 3.92, 95% CI -0.17 to 8.01, I 0%), Tegner score (MD 1.04, 95% CI -0.04 to 2.11, I 71%), or subjective results (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.74-1.34, I 33%) between conservative and surgical treatment groups.
Despite better pain outcomes with conservative group, the present study revealed no significant differences in clinical outcomes between conservative treatment and surgical treatment in children and adolescents with acute patellar dislocation. Since there are no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two groups, routine surgical treatment is not advocated for treating acute patellar dislocation in children and adolescents.
本研究旨在通过评估哪种治疗方法能更好地改善18岁及以下儿童和青少年急性髌骨脱位的临床结局,来阐明治疗髌骨脱位的证据。
检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库电子数据库,查找2008年3月至2022年8月发表的比较儿童和青少年急性髌骨脱位保守治疗与手术治疗临床结局的相关文章。根据Cochrane协作指南进行数据检索、提取、分析和质量评估。使用物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)批判性评估评分系统和纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表分数对每项研究进行质量评估。为计算每个结局的总体合并效应量,采用Review Manager 5.3版本(Cochrane协作组织,软件更新,牛津)。
共纳入三项随机对照试验(RCT)和一项前瞻性研究。在疼痛方面[平均差(MD)6.59,95%置信区间(CI)1.73 - 11.45,I² 0%],保守治疗组的结局明显更好。然而,在任何评估结局方面,如再脱位[风险比(RR)1.36,95% CI 0.72 - 2.54,I² 65%]、库贾拉评分(MD 3.92,95% CI -0.17至8.01,I² 0%)、特格纳评分(MD 1.04,95% CI -0.04至2.11, I² 71%)或主观结果(RR 0.99,95% CI 0.74 - 1.34,I² 33%),保守治疗组和手术治疗组之间均无显著差异。
尽管保守治疗组在疼痛结局方面更好,但本研究显示,急性髌骨脱位的儿童和青少年保守治疗与手术治疗在临床结局上无显著差异。由于两组在临床结局上无显著差异,不主张对儿童和青少年急性髌骨脱位进行常规手术治疗。