Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Rd, LondonSE1 7EH, UK.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, VancouverBC, Canada.
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Sep;26(9):1907-1916. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001246. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
Efficacy studies show early nutrition interventions improving infant nutrition status, but understanding caregiver acceptability is required for implementation of such interventions. This systematic review examines caregivers' perceptions of nutrition interventions in young children.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO from date of online journal inception through December 2020. Interventions included oral (powder/liquid/tablet) and/or intravenous supplementation, food fortification and nutrition counselling. Inclusion criteria included primary research, data presented on caregiver perception and studies published in English. Quality assessment was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Studies underwent narrative synthesis using inductive thematic analysis.
No restriction.
Caregivers of children under 24 months of age.
Of 11 798 records identified, thirty-seven publications were included. Interventions included oral supplementation, food fortification and nutrition counselling. Caregivers included mothers (83 %), fathers, grandparents and aunts. Perceptions were gathered through individual interviews, focus group discussions, questionnaires, surveys and ratings. Totally, 89 % of studies noted high acceptability ( 33 most notably increased appetite ( 17). In total, 57 % of studies ( 21) cited low acceptability, commonly from side effects ( 13) such as gastrointestinal issues, appetite loss and stained teeth.
Positive perceptions and enthusiasm for interventions were frequently reported. Key to implementation was the increased appetite noted by caregivers. A substantial proportion of studies reported negative perceptions, mainly due to side effects. In future interventions, mitigation and education around common side effects are crucial for acceptability. Understanding both positive and negative caregiver perceptions is important for informing future nutrition interventions and strengthening sustainability and implementation.
疗效研究表明,早期营养干预可改善婴儿的营养状况,但为实施此类干预措施,需要了解照顾者的可接受性。本系统评价检查了照顾者对幼儿营养干预措施的看法。
我们检索了 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL 和 PsychINFO,检索时间从在线期刊创刊日期到 2020 年 12 月。干预措施包括口服(粉末/液体/片剂)和/或静脉补充、食物强化和营养咨询。纳入标准包括原始研究、呈现照顾者认知数据以及以英文发表的研究。使用批判性评估技能计划工具进行质量评估。使用归纳主题分析对研究进行叙述性综合。
无限制。
24 个月以下儿童的照顾者。
在 11798 条记录中,有 37 篇文献被纳入。干预措施包括口服补充剂、食物强化和营养咨询。照顾者包括母亲(83%)、父亲、祖父母和阿姨。通过个人访谈、焦点小组讨论、问卷、调查和评分收集看法。共有 89%的研究报告了较高的可接受性(33 项研究中最显著的是增加食欲(17 项)。共有 57%的研究(21 项)报告了较低的可接受性,主要是由于副作用(13 项),如胃肠道问题、食欲下降和牙齿染色。
经常报告对干预措施的积极看法和热情。照顾者注意到的增加食欲是实施的关键。相当一部分研究报告了负面看法,主要是由于副作用。在未来的干预措施中,缓解和教育常见副作用对可接受性至关重要。了解照顾者的积极和消极看法对于为未来的营养干预措施提供信息以及加强可持续性和实施非常重要。