University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Health Educ Behav. 2024 Feb;51(1):128-143. doi: 10.1177/10901981231179498. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
Community health workers (CHWs) are health promotion specialists who are trusted members of the community served and have a close understanding of the community's needs and values. CHWs are a cost-effective and scalable workforce to promote health among men through tailored approaches. The purpose of the present review was to use the RE-AIM Framework to assess design, implementation, and outcomes of CHW-implemented health promotion efforts tailored for men to provide recommendations for future efforts.
The protocol was pre-registered with PROSPERO. The primary inclusion criteria were that the interventions were (a) implemented at least partially by CHWs, (b) conducted only among men, and (c) designed to improve a health-related outcome. PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Global Index Medicus were searched using a librarian-generated search strategy. In all, 1,437 articles were uploaded to Rayyan and two reviewers blindly reviewed each article for inclusion. A total of 24 articles met the inclusion criteria.
Most interventions (a) targeted men under 50 years, (b) were conducted among a subset of underserved men, (c) improved health outcomes, (d) community-based and informed, (e) atheoretical, and (f) had satisfactory retention rates. The roles and responsibilities of CHWs were varied. Attention was given to training of CHWs, but limited attention was given to how/if the CHWs were supervised.
CHW-implemented interventions can improve health outcomes among men. Opportunities exist to build on past interventions, such as addressing mental health and incorporating prosocial aspects of masculinity. The results have implications for designing similar interventions.
社区卫生工作者(CHWs)是健康促进专家,他们是所服务社区中值得信赖的成员,对社区的需求和价值观有深入的了解。CHWs 是一种具有成本效益和可扩展性的劳动力,可以通过量身定制的方法促进男性健康。本研究旨在使用 RE-AIM 框架评估针对男性的 CHW 实施的健康促进干预措施的设计、实施和结果,为未来的努力提供建议。
该方案在 PROSPERO 上预先注册。主要纳入标准为:(a)至少部分由 CHW 实施,(b)仅在男性中进行,(c)旨在改善健康相关结局。使用图书馆员生成的搜索策略在 PubMed、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 Global Index Medicus 中进行搜索。共上传了 1437 篇文章至 Rayyan,两名审查员对每篇文章进行了盲审以确定其是否纳入。共有 24 篇文章符合纳入标准。
大多数干预措施(a)针对 50 岁以下的男性,(b)针对服务不足的男性中的一部分,(c)改善了健康结局,(d)基于社区且有信息支持,(e)无理论基础,(f)保留率令人满意。CHW 的角色和责任多种多样。关注 CHW 的培训,但对 CHW 如何/是否得到监督关注有限。
CHW 实施的干预措施可以改善男性的健康结局。有机会借鉴过去的干预措施,例如解决心理健康问题和纳入男子气概的亲社会方面。研究结果对设计类似干预措施具有启示意义。