Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287309. eCollection 2023.
Preterm birth is a leading cause of under-5 mortality, with the greatest burden in lower-resource settings. Strategies to improve preterm survival have been tested, but strategy costs are less understood. We estimate costs of a highly effective Preterm Birth Initiative (PTBi) intrapartum intervention package (data strengthening, WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist, simulation and team training, quality improvement collaboratives) and active control (data strengthening, Safe Childbirth Checklist).
In our analysis, we estimated costs incremental to current cost of intrapartum care (in 2020 $US) for the PTBi intervention package and active control in Kenya and Uganda. We costed the intervention package and control in two scenarios: 1) non-research implementation costs as observed in the PTBi study (Scenario 1, mix of public and private inputs), and 2) hypothetical costs for a model of implementation into Ministry of Health programming (Scenario 2, mostly public inputs). Using a healthcare system perspective, we employed micro-costing of personnel, supplies, physical space, and travel, including 3 sequential phases: program planning/adaptation (9 months); high-intensity implementation (15 months); lower-intensity maintenance (annual). One-way sensitivity analyses explored the effects of uncertainty in Scenario 2.
Scenario 1 PTBi package total costs were $1.11M in Kenya ($48.13/birth) and $0.74M in Uganda ($17.19/birtth). Scenario 2 total costs were $0.86M in Kenya ($23.91/birth) and $0.28M in Uganda ($5.47/birth); annual maintenance phase costs per birth were $16.36 in Kenya and $3.47 in Uganda. In each scenario and country, personnel made up at least 72% of total PTBi package costs. Total Scenario 2 costs in Uganda were consistently one-third those of Kenya, largely driven by differences in facility delivery volume and personnel salaries.
If taken up and implemented, the PTBi package has the potential to save preterm lives, with potential steady-state (maintenance) costs that would be roughly 5-15% of total per-birth healthcare costs in Uganda and Kenya.
早产是导致 5 岁以下儿童死亡的主要原因,资源匮乏地区的负担最大。已经测试了提高早产儿存活率的策略,但对策略成本的了解较少。我们估计一种高效的早产干预计划(PTBi)的分娩期干预方案(数据加强、世卫组织安全分娩清单、模拟和团队培训、质量改进合作)和主动控制(数据加强、安全分娩清单)的成本。
在我们的分析中,我们估计了肯尼亚和乌干达 PTBi 干预方案和主动控制相对于当前分娩期护理成本(2020 年为 2020 年)的增量成本。我们在两种情况下对干预方案和对照组进行了成本核算:1)PTBi 研究中观察到的非研究实施成本(方案 1,公共和私人投入的混合),2)纳入卫生部方案的模型实施的假设成本(方案 2,主要是公共投入)。我们采用医疗保健系统视角,对人员、用品、物理空间和差旅进行微观成本核算,包括三个连续阶段:项目规划/调整(9 个月);高强度实施(15 个月);低强度维持(年度)。单因素敏感性分析探讨了方案 2 不确定性的影响。
方案 1 肯尼亚的 PTBi 套餐总成本为 111 万美元(48.13 美元/出生),乌干达为 74 万美元(17.19 美元/出生)。方案 2 肯尼亚的总成本为 860 万美元(23.91 美元/出生),乌干达为 280 万美元(5.47 美元/出生);肯尼亚每年维持阶段的每例分娩费用为 16.36 美元,乌干达为 3.47 美元。在每个方案和国家中,人员成本至少占 PTBi 套餐总成本的 72%。乌干达的方案 2 总成本始终比肯尼亚低三分之一,这主要是由于分娩量和人员工资的差异。
如果采用并实施,PTBi 套餐有可能拯救早产儿的生命,其潜在的稳定状态(维持)成本将占乌干达和肯尼亚每例分娩总医疗费用的 5-15%左右。