Suppr超能文献

在本科牙科学生教学中使用反馈:使用反馈三明治法还是问答式模型?

The use of feedback in teaching undergraduate dental students: feedback sandwich or Ask-Tell-Ask model?

机构信息

Department of Dental Materials, Faculty of Dentistry, Asian Institute of Medicine, Science and Technology (AIMST) University, 08100, Bedong, Kedah, Malaysia.

Department of Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Asian Institute of Medicine, Science and Technology (AIMST) University, 08100, Bedong, Kedah, Malaysia.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jun 23;23(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03141-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Feedback is regarded as a key component of formative assessment and one of the elements with the greatest impact on students' academic learning. The present study aimed to evaluate and compare students' perceptions of the use of two feedback models, namely feedback sandwich and Ask-Tell-Ask (ATA), in teaching dental materials science courses.

METHODS

All undergraduate second-year dental students were invited to participate in the dental materials science practical session and were randomly allocated into two groups: Group 1 (feedback) sandwich and Group 2 (ATA). The session began with the teacher giving a short briefing on the commonly used dental materials, followed by a short demonstration of the manipulation of those materials. Students were then allowed to mix and manipulate the materials, and teachers provided feedback accordingly. At the end of the session, 16 close-ended (five-point Likert scales) and an open-ended questionnaire were distributed to students to evaluate their perceptions of the feedback given. Internal reliability of the questionnaire items was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Mean feedback scores were analysed using an independent t-test with ANCOVA for controlling gender and ethnicity. Thematic analysis was used to code the qualitative data.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine students participated in the present study with the majority being females (72.5%) and Chinese (79.7%). Cronbach's alpha analysis suggested removing three Likert-scale items, with the remaining 13 items being accepted. Generally, no significant difference was noted between the two groups (p = 0.197), but three items were found to be significant (p < 0.05), with higher mean scores in the feedback sandwich group. Moreover, no significant difference was noted between the two feedback models (p = 0.325) when controlling gender and ethnicity. The open-ended question showed that students in the feedback sandwich group expressed greater positive perceptions.

CONCLUSION

Although students generally had positive perceptions of both feedback models, they tended to favour the feedback sandwich. Neither gender nor ethnicity affected the students' perceptions of the two feedback models.

摘要

背景

反馈被视为形成性评估的关键组成部分之一,也是对学生学业学习影响最大的因素之一。本研究旨在评估和比较学生对两种反馈模式(反馈三明治和问答式反馈(Ask-Tell-Ask,ATA))在牙科材料科学课程教学中的使用的看法。

方法

邀请所有二年级牙科专业本科生参加牙科材料科学实践课程,并将他们随机分为两组:第 1 组(反馈三明治)和第 2 组(ATA)。课程开始时,教师简要介绍了常用的牙科材料,然后简短演示了这些材料的操作。然后,学生被允许混合和操作材料,教师根据需要提供反馈。课程结束时,向学生分发 16 个封闭式(五点李克特量表)和一个开放式问卷,以评估他们对反馈的看法。使用 Cronbach's alpha 评估问卷项目的内部可靠性。使用独立 t 检验和协方差分析(ANCOVA)分析均值反馈得分,以控制性别和种族。使用主题分析对定性数据进行编码。

结果

共有 69 名学生参加了本研究,其中大多数是女性(72.5%)和中国人(79.7%)。Cronbach's alpha 分析建议删除三个李克特量表项目,其余 13 个项目被接受。总体而言,两组之间没有显著差异(p=0.197),但有三个项目存在显著差异(p<0.05),反馈三明治组的平均得分较高。此外,当控制性别和种族时,两种反馈模式之间没有显著差异(p=0.325)。开放式问题显示,反馈三明治组的学生表达了更积极的看法。

结论

尽管学生普遍对两种反馈模式有积极的看法,但他们倾向于喜欢反馈三明治。性别和种族均不影响学生对两种反馈模式的看法。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Giving Feedback.给予反馈。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2021 Jun;44(2):237-247. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2020.12.006. Epub 2021 Apr 29.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验