Suzuki Noriyuki, Inden Yasuya, Yanagisawa Satoshi, Shimizu Yuuki, Narita Shingo, Hiramatsu Kei, Yamauchi Ryota, Watanabe Ryo, Tsurumi Naoki, Shimojo Masafumi, Suga Kazumasa, Tsuji Yukiomi, Shibata Rei, Murohara Toyoaki
Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai, Showa, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Mar;68(2):355-369. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01581-1. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
Few studies have reported on the quantitative evaluation of autonomic nerve modification after balloon ablation. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of cryoballoon and hotballoon ablations on the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and their relationship with prognosis.
We included 234 patients who underwent cryoballoon ablation (n = 190) or hotballoon ablation (n = 44) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was performed on all patients using a 3-min electrocardiogram at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation. HRV parameters and prognoses were compared between the two balloon systems.
Ln low-frequency (LF), Ln high-frequency (HF), standard deviation of the R-R intervals (SDNN), and RR intervals significantly decreased after 1 month in both groups, but the changes were more pronounced in the cryoballoon group than in the hotballoon group. In contrast, HRV indices in the hotballoon ablation group decreased gradually and reached their lowest point 3-to-6 months after the procedure, which was later than in the cryoballoon ablation group. The recurrence rate did not differ between the two groups. HRV parameters changed similarly in the cryoballoon group, regardless of recurrence. However, patients with recurrence had significantly higher SDNN and Ln LF at 12 months than those without recurrence in the hotballoon group (41.2 ± 39.3 ms vs. 18.5 ± 12.6 ms, p = 0.006, and 2.2 ± 0.7 ms vs. 1.5 ± 0.7 ms, p = 0.003, respectively).
The time course of HRV changes differed between cryoballoon and hotballoon ablations. Hence, the two balloon systems may have distinct effects on the ANS and its role in prognosis.
很少有研究报道球囊消融术后自主神经改变的定量评估。因此,本研究旨在评估冷冻球囊和热球囊消融对自主神经系统(ANS)的影响及其与预后的关系。
我们纳入了234例因阵发性心房颤动接受冷冻球囊消融(n = 190)或热球囊消融(n = 44)的患者。在基线、消融后1、3、6和12个月,使用3分钟心电图对所有患者进行心率变异性(HRV)分析。比较两种球囊系统的HRV参数和预后。
两组在1个月后,低频(LF)对数、高频(HF)对数、RR间期标准差(SDNN)和RR间期均显著降低,但冷冻球囊组的变化比热球囊组更明显。相比之下,热球囊消融组的HRV指标逐渐下降,并在术后3至6个月达到最低点,这比冷冻球囊消融组晚。两组的复发率没有差异。在冷冻球囊组中,无论是否复发,HRV参数变化相似。然而,在热球囊组中,复发患者在12个月时的SDNN和LF对数显著高于未复发患者(分别为41.2±39.3毫秒对18.5±12.6毫秒,p = 0.006;2.2±0.7毫秒对1.5±0.7毫秒,p = 0.003)。
冷冻球囊和热球囊消融术后HRV变化的时间进程不同。因此,两种球囊系统可能对ANS有不同影响及其在预后中的作用。